| Crazy excuses
| Kristoph / / skrew
I think you still do not know that the insanity # 9 most of the
material - excerpts from personal correspondence with the
author of various sceners. So, one of the "victims" of this act
chief editor of the newspaper "Insanity" has become your
direct, kristoph. Of course, the publication of our personal
communication in a popular newspaper, without my knowledge -
this is nonsense and just some sort of shamelessness, but ...
Scene! Wildness - her middle name. People do not write the
laws, no one ever will not do that "necessary" and everyone can
respond to any your pritenziyu: "fuck off!", and you will
understand that, except return "suck my dick!" to say nothing
can. Although some have small privileges, for example, people
who are editors of alternative publications.
So, to hell with the entry. I thought it would be nice to look
at "Justify" direct culprit - Surv! V0r'a, Chief
Editor of "Insanity".
... Yes, you can see that I am acting on the principle of "like
cures", however, and it sometimes is useful. I will say more -
when there is no alternative, we have to go to such extreme
measures. Below almost entirely a letter Surv! v0r'a me, the
date - June 28, 2001. For the points - the words of Michael,
with no points - mine. Here we go!
. Why am I stuffed in an excerpt from the insanity of our
letters to you? . I agree with you, when you talk, or until
just podrazume.vaesh - that make it not worth it! I was
fundamentally wrong, kog.da did not ask permission. In
principle, you can at me obi.detsya and send to distant lands
.... Hmm, but the whole point . Next year - what do you think
they will affect your image? Plo.ho / good? In my opinion any
way. This kind of thing to warm up interest . To your persona
and magazines, HMD, etc. Venture with the publication of me.nya
arose when I realized that the majority of the people . In
private correspondence says 'the truth' is more approximate to
isti.ne than when he specifically fish for answers to
pos.tavlennye issues, such as interviews.
In one paragraph, piled up a bunch of those confounded little
similarity hitting on me, agreed that to publish my letters do
not cost and in the end gave a new theory on how sobstennyh
production information. Ie He began to justify himself is
already here, already in of these, the first line.
. The whole trick is _kak my_ perceive formal interviews and
. Informal. The newspaper does not mention that this informal
. Thing. All this must be addressed by the readers. That's how
ne.ofitsialnoe interview, more like a monologue can evaluate
all the . That was named in about i9 nuo. By the way, you're
not alone ... . All content insanity9 be based on findings from
the correspondence with . Sceners because it's the only way to
get informa.tsiyu ... and I give it (the information) using
with reference to those who . Provided. Remember how framed
Random when told to . Referring to some kind of brow with
enlgiht.ru, tsts001 that would not be? Y . You have any more
questions?
Without taking into account the last two sentences of this
paragraph quite important in the sense that the survivor
himself admitted that that all the material in "insty # 9,"
based on the findings from the correspondence with sceners.
Asking about my attitude to various types of information [the
official / personal], survivor does not even calculates to hear
the answer. Yes, in personal correspondence, people can afford
more than the official press releases, and it's worth noting
the important thing: it is is not what a press release he was
lying, and in frank letters. The reason being, with whom
correspondence is, as you close to this man! I can tell you for
sure: I wrote about the IGM very few of those with whom regular
contact, and describing his impressions of the upcoming Partee
survivor'u y I even think there was that he would publish them.
And accordingly, I allowed myself to harsh words, relevant in a
friendly conversation, but not in the official paper.
Simplifying idea: in any case, publication of private
correspondence without knowledge of its uchastnka - complete
nonsense and absurdity. Yayk! Just disgusting!
. Let's get the rest. Framed I thee? On the one
. Hand - yes, on the other hand I am more than confident that
no, because . I just can say that about his outswing with HMD
and yus.toy you told me not only me, not only in e-mail, and
irc. . If you're expecting from me some excuses in this regard,
the po.zhaluysta - all in your hands. Do you have at least a
strong . Remedy for headache - CRY. Tell me that was not true in
. That I shoved into insanity under your name?
So, he calculates catch me on the last question, implying that
I begin to list what I have lied to him in our correspondence.
In addition, he argues that the same thing about me HMD wrote
on irc. Pretty arrogant statement, considering check that all
the channel is simply unrealistic. Yes, maybe I'm talking about
HMD [but obviously not the same as in correspondence with
Survo!] In private with someone, maybe even with prof / / 4d.
However, this still does not mean that my words without my
permission, you can publish in Esme!
. My point of view one - it should have been done, ie
publiko.vat, though you did not give approval, and would not
give it in principle ...
Here it is, what made me long to strain the muscles in his 7
the face and speaking easier - laughter. In truth, survivor
manages to contradicts himself in one letter, a couple of
paragraphs above! For convenience quote: "I agree with you when
you say or until just means - that make it not worth it! I
was fundamentally wrong when not asked permission. "
. On my report. You know, I was surprised to learn that YOU
(screw) re.tsenziya not like, Screamer me so on my own and
passed. . Well, it hurts it was necessary to: (. Although I am
not sure that someone would . Could write it better than I do
or write or . The same spirit, but 30-40 people that are sure
to write . You via e-mail or snailmail with a pair of words'
that's cool, I sor.valo tower, the most rulny e-zine ...'. It
is written, as a rule, . All the authors of the press and there
is nothing to be surprised, to boast . More because it's too
boring !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! New.comers a report that is
exactly what is meant by this . The word literally! If I'm
wrong, then how do you oharakte.rizuesh your project? In
insanity9 published, for example, only . The most interesting
and remarkable in my opinion the views of the scene . Although
people who sent their feedback was great.
A feeling that in this paragraph stuck ten different topics
that seem to be, and together, but if you get a grasp more
closely, you understand all the insanity.
So, try to understand. First, he argues that the written
best review of [krik1 and that more so could not write
no.
"It is written, as a rule, all the authors of the press and
wonder here nothing, boast all the more so because it's too
boring !!!", - and Now tell me, why he took that I was
surprised about this or even more praise? "
"Newcomers in a report that is exactly what is meant by this
word in the literal sense! If I'm wrong, then how do you
oharakterizuesh your project? "- Note, he began to prove to me
just correct one statement in his review, with This would be
like forgetting about other things.
"In insanity9 published, for example, only the most interesting
and outstanding in my opinion the views of the scene, although
the people who sent the responses were more "- what it all says
- an enigma.
...
Summarizing this short note, I want to say that all
same, no matter how opradval a survivor, to publish personal
correspondence without the permission or even notification of
its members - is simply preposterous. Yes, I am repeating
myself, but it is not important.
What do I do next? Nothing. Be restrained in his correspondence
with such people, and always know - your words are unexpectedly
may appear in the pages of popular newspapers.
"Trust no one!"
