Continuing the theme of the editors, I want to
little focus on the text, so
say, editors, or rather, editor.
Honestly, I had already erased (in contrast
of different versions of WORD 's).
Advancer Text Editor v 1.24
(Anaconda)
(C) 1995 Mishenko Alex
Beautiful name "Anaconda" and prog itself from itself
represents nothing. Office of the shell is not very convenient
(Although, I have found all needed to work
keyboard shortcuts for five minutes). Russian keyboard layout
"QWERTY" (though This is good, but you see some of this bungled
...). Calling features editor is not quite stantartny (Symbol
Shift + I, is something new). The feature set is minimal,
the same as in Khokhlovskiy editor.
File extension by default '?', Ie
question mark, but can read and files
ZX-WORD 'but (and here the files ZX / IBM Editor' a,
with the expansion of 'W' though and read, but
incorrectly processes). In the file menu is missing an
opportunity to view directory. When downloading a file name has
to fill his hand. Very brake job with the disc. Briefly same
can be said about this editor is only one: BAD. ZX /
IBM Khokhlova much more convenient and faster
rabote.Pravda You can refer to the release date of the program
- in 1995. But the same ZXWORD and the first version could in
many more than Anaconda.
From time to time in my review get demos of certain
programs, and I always thought arises, not whether to allocate
them to an independent clause? Another question arises as to
where You can get these programs (trapped
in review). We do not publish them for quite
obvious reasons. The question is:
to whether to publish the addresses of the authors
programs (or others of their coordinates, if
they certainly are) or not. If we
publish, then it is advertising. If
No, many readers may not find
this program (although they need them). Large
please answer this question. It is advisable to get answers
from the same authors programs. Finished, I review new products
demo of the new editor of digital music ...
