The Compo:
about fast results
Room dedicated to the end of the first part of the virtual
musical The Compo. One may agree that the idea failed, as well
as all our previous ideas to work with the masses (vpomnim 128
bytes intros compo). Such a hefty survey found
the strength to fill only a few
sverhlyudey.Togda as occurred in about the same time of the
census Respect with a much longer questionnaire scored most of
these questionnaires. Well, quite logical. The second part of
the components of the questions (Very unpopular) would be
eliminated. Sm.spisok.
The Compo, though being a joke party, is actually quite a
serious project. It has long been assumed to appreciate all
that already attained over the years in art
AY / YM, prioritize and pay creators according to merit
(sm.spisok)
The biggest prize for any creator
is the recognition of his work. Not
so important that surveyed should not vote outcome, the authors
list, and on own work - the result will be not less than
tochen.Dazhe more accurate and nepredvzyat.Imena,
which is spinning in the rumor, in the first place
would fall to the winners, whether the alignment of voting
standard. The more so because the vote for such layouts is
regularly project ZX-Chart, why again?
A lot of nonsense, I dashed off now:) but
it's nothing, I have nowhere to go, do not write,
Journal of the results will come, Nik-O
I live eat, so I did not write it, read on: P
What kind of prize can there be? It is assumed that we will
go to the store - and buy ... uh-uh ... what? RADIODETAL?
souvenir? CDROM? (Fu) or ptsshnuyu chemin de fer? (Shame)
But a diploma, I hope it will!
Treaty, perhaps, to himself, that the diploma itself, I will
not print:)
There was nakladochka rule representation works on konkurs.V
principle, being "By all users", we, the organizers can put on
the contest of any stranger track. AND not even one. But it
turns out that we are likely to shift in the desired direction
of our future results of the vote, what are the results we, the
organizers, on the contrary I would like to see in the
uncomplicated form! : Other rules are, in principle,
justified themselves.
The principle of "to understand the nomination in his own
way, without asking, I think is fair. The fact of installing
the i-th operation of j-th points and should be (a fact,
should) influence is state of the universe in relation to work
And as her correspondence nomination and professionally, and
memorability, and the prevalence of, finally.
The principle of "vote for any number of works" is justified
by the definition, then I have no one to talk sense:)
The principle of "count himself a composer
whether or not the composer "has allowed the organizers to
avoid responsibility for an incorrect definition of the essence
of each composer's voters. This is not "Elite rezults", which
is gaining zhyurey unknown and who knows what:)
The principle of "write that he did not remember
we remember ourselves, "I hope that does not explain
not! (But had fun;)
It is a pity that not the whole truth about the mechanics of
the above came in the rules, laziness was, and now still
interesting, rightly or wrongly understood us there, on the
other side of the screen?
Organizers
