span> SoundTrack: COMPOSITION BY RLA / CRG 1998
__________________________________________
(C) CAV Inc. / AURYN / CPU
___________________________________________
On different ....
I read here recently, some publications
and marveled at some things. Start over
with those publications, which I do not
S was able to read on their
c S Pent'e (Pentagon). These
S is: Publick Spirit
) S and ZX-Element. Last I
M S was able to read is true under
and S emulsion. What unites these two
RS edition, so it's a mouse. In
S many, of course, issues
Now there is support
Bat. But that's not everywhere it is working properly (or
rather not working). After all, how many times said, if you put
some kind of auto device, then verify, as work. If not sure,
then do SETUP, that it would be possible to work normally,
disabling the device nafig! Of course, I I understand that
there are people who obezglyuchat these publications, but the
impression formed from simple users try
read a new magazine and cool bummer.
And this garbage is not the first time. In this connection
the question to our dear coders, why the hell you do that? And
grandmothers are asking for their bend. And wonder why no one
itching to pay you. Or recoverable, for example, the new
Commanderie, located in the annex to the ZX-Element'u. Again,
comrades climbed into the ROM. Yes, I no zhist ROM will not
alter. A reading # 1F can be other ways. Comrades of Belarus
calls on all priderzhivatsya standards take into account the
machine with a separate field of memory and an unstable bus
data, and soak yourself that?
I can certainly argue that they
needed to intercept # 1F, to track
errors, and other means they did not
because those machines that are used in Belarus, the firmware
TR-DOS'a, gently speaking, is not standard. This is your
reason, but catch a disk error (though
all) can and using the standard input
in TR-DOS, full information about it (including the driver) was
ADVENTURER'e # 5 or # 6. It turns out, no one reads,
so what? In general, reading the various editions,
I marvel at some denseness of some
people. A feeling that they are stuck on
level of 94-year and do not read anything, nor about
What is not known. I am, damn it, I try each edition devoted
SPECCY read (that I will do with him then - it's another
matter). AND I do not need to say that users do not
know how to get new programs and publications. Address
INFORKOM'a know almost everything, but Other addresses can also
extract from the scrolls and help'ov. Addresses for
correspondence publish all known publications and groups. And
advertising section should occasionally read. This your chance
to declare itself the world. Do you think these publications
are not excited about the new author? And do not be embarrassed
of their literacy (You should have seen the source of my
articles ....) more would you write, the more interesting and
varied information will appear. After all, the possibility of
SPECCY esche certainly not exhausted until the end. A possible
coding for sure! Know as the affected people who have seen
working SPECCY, so in the 94-93 year, when I they show the new
prog and demos. They disbelief that this is SPECTRUM. So give
an example. At work I have a system administrator
saw SPECCY, though it was a cassette-48
and it was a long time (well at least seen). AND
when I showed her under the emulsion (the emulsion was
just rulez on makeshift from the standard
Pentagon'a, the sample 1993 can not be distinguished)
demos with ENLIGHT'a 97, she was shocked. If there was still a
sound card, shock, probably would have been stronger. In my
observation, those who were with SPECCY long enough time, do
not forget it ever. So, in Rybinsk Auryn gathered under its
banner (hist ADVENTURER) almost everyone who has ever wanted to
do on chtoto SPECCY. You should be proud that your use of
SPECCY. I do not I will speak, as it is convenient to work
etc. or that WIN-95 must die (yes
really, that's for sure, so I manage to halt the system per
minute, or even less, especially when things run the four
programs, and in general, it depends on the phases of the moon
:-)). Here, again paper turned out not very much, getting old
maybe ...
-----------------------------------------
