VG93

ZXNet echo conference «hardware.zx»

From Stanislav Lomakin To All 17 January 2007

Hello, All Tell me, please, what other computers use K1818VG93 (wd1793)

From Nikolay Gribeshchenko To All 17 January 2007

Hello, boo_boo I think it was in Corvettes.

From Mike To All 17 January 2007

Hello, ng_dead In the early PCs, when there were still animated cartoons.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 17 January 2007

Hello Mike Mik> In the early PCs, when there were still animated cartoons. It didn’t exist in early PCs, 8272 was used there throughout my life.

From Mark Antonov To All 17 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat in "Search"

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> On PCs, 8272 or their variants were installed basically everywhere Firstly, I haven’t written about PCs anywhere, and secondly, in all “our” computers like EC1841, Iskra (I don’t remember the number), MS Electronics (I don’t remember the number, from UKNC), and etc. it was VG93, because other controllers are not Soviet industry mastered it. And there were no domestic HD controllers (as well as disk drives). Also, VG93 was installed in computers produced by the GDR, such as Robotron, etc. (naturally it was not our VG93 that stood there, but their analogue - the fd1793 clone (that’s what this one is called controller manufactured by wd)). This is precisely why in socialist countries. camps and DD 720Kb drives were distributed, when in the rest of the world there were SD 360Kb drives, and then immediately HD 1.2Mb. And there were plenty of HD controllers in the West, besides i8272, there were WD37C65 and NEC and more a whole bunch, but their command system was compatible (mostly, plus all sorts of extensions).

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, The Exploited In all computers that had 5.25" 720Kb drives (with support for dual density, MFM recording method)

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat The whole point of the "EC" and "Iskra" series is to make computers based on domestic elements base - without imported parts. Otherwise they would have just made XT or AT 286 and not would be steaming. In the USSR, work was even carried out on cloning 80286, it was done several prototypes, but this did not receive development, and subsequently didn't make sense, because... They began to bring imported computers.

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> nothing like that, there were 8272. With a 720Kb floppy drive, well, well, please send the controller circuit to the studio. There's even The Soviet processors were KR1810VM86 and KR1810VM88.

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> PC FDD controller on 8272 normally operates at 720k The controller operates either in HD or DD mode (the latter differ only number of tracks 40 for 360Kb floppies or 80 for 720Kb), SD mode (method FM recording is never used at all), controller operating mode determined by the type of connected drive. The controller has a signal for control of recording density and spindle speed (pin 2 on the connector), this the signal is present (processed) only on the HD drive, for the DD drive this signal goes nowhere.

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> The latest ECs were ordinary 286 in the fatherboard type, on Bla> only the clock was on the crossboard, and everything was imported. Bla> Quote: I wrote about those models that were XT and were made on domestic elements, they had a board - a regular motherboard with slots, only there were slots non-standard (Soviet connectors), but externally they were no different from imported XTs (same desktop), there were problems with the character generator, since in the ROM video controller, the font was flashed in the "Standard" GOST encoding (instead of "Alternative" encoding GOST (cp866)).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> I wrote about those models that were XT and were made domestically dea> elements, they had a board - a regular motherboard with slots XT EC were produced in a completely different design, Iskra 1030 too (several boards in a stack with SNP connectors) that have nothing in common with a PC, and here’s how once there were 8088/87 or 8086/87, 8272 and 6848, the rest was Soviet, although in some places there were still 8250. And they worked with domestic 720k drives (partially completed with imports).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> With a 720Kb drive, well, well, at one time, when homemade HTs were riveted, it even had a 1.2 MB controller done, and the standard PC FDD controller on the 8272 normally works at 720k.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> The whole essence of the "EU" and "Iskra" series is to make computers on the domestic dea> element base - without imported parts. The latest ECs were the usual 286 fatherboard type, on a crossboard only the clock was there, and everything was imported. dea> The controller is working.. The controller has a signal.. why is this description .. you just turn it on - and that’s it without any modifications or modifications works - this is its normal mode.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> In all computers that had 5.25" 720Kb drives (with support dea> double density, MFM recording method) You're talking nonsense. In PCs, 8272 or their variants were mostly installed everywhere, 93 installed only in some perverted computers like Search in order to save money on import.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> in all “our” computers like EC1841, Iskra nothing like that, there were 8272.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello, boo_boo boo> exactly, no longer has and why, if it’s not a secret, did you need to know where, besides the VG93 speck, it’s used?

From Stanislav Lomakin To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> KR580VV51 - analogue of the newer i8251 dea> KR1847VV2 - analogue of i8250 (only like USSR post) dea> P.S. It looks like the topic should be moved to the "Other computers" section, because... to dea> it has nothing to do with Spectrum. exactly, it no longer has :v2_blink:

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, boo_boo boo> exactly, no longer has Perhaps it is necessary to delete posts that are not related to VG93 (review by PC controllers type 8272 and circuitry EC and Iskra)

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Regarding the ES COMPUTER http://www.computer-museum.ru/histussr/es_pevm.htm, prots as I said, domestic, only imported in 1843 and 1849. By the way, here is a link on the topic (about MS1502, there is even a photo of the controller on VG93) http://www.phantom.sannata.ru/cgi-bin/ikonboard/topic.cgi?forum=7&topic=288 By the way, there really was a Soviet analogue of the i8272 called KR580VG72 (possibly there were other series).

From deathsoft To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> 8250 KR580VV51 - analogue of the newer i8251 KR1847VV2 - analogue of i8250 (only like USSR post) P.S. It looks like the topic should be moved to the "Other computers" section, because... to Spectrum she has no relation.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft dea> posts not related to VG93 should also be deleted (review PC dea> controllers type 8272 By the way, 8272 is used in Western Speck platforms (more advanced ones by the way in terms of the disk system, and the axis there is normal, unlike the wretched TR-DOS).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello deathsoft 8251(vv51) were not used in the RS, only in some Soviet clones for lack of 8250.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Mike Mik> If you didn't see them, it doesn't mean they didn't exist. look carefully at what kind of microcircuits are there, if you are talking about PC controllers. dea> the Soviet analogue of the i8272 was called KR580VG72 but I didn’t have a chance to see this either at the EU or at Iskra. Maybe also 6845 and 8250 were they Soviet? :) By the way, K1810VM86M is apparently a NEC V30.

From Mike To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> It didn’t exist in early PCs, 8272 was used there throughout my life. Well, what are you going to tell me? Can I show you a couple of these cartoons? Until now They've been lying there for a while now. If you didn't see them, it doesn't mean they didn't exist.

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> The latest ECs were ordinary 286 in the fatherboard type, on Bla> only the clock was on the crossboard, and everything was imported How many times have people been told that there is no such thing as a “phaserboard type” anywhere? does not exist except his head - does not understand...

From Roman Borokhov To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat The drive for 8-bit Atari (the device is called Atari-1050) contains WD1793.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello, boo_boo boo> Isn’t it possible to dig into the header from some non-Spectrum emulsion %) there is not much choice - Search and Atari, you will have to steal from the Spectrum :). It's necessary I should have called the topic “where can I get the VG93 emulsion?” - this just might I'd like to give you a hint :). Ask the moderators to rename the topic. Also ask Maxagora - in vTR-DOS for example VG93 should be emulated and there are sources if this will suit you.

From Stanislav Lomakin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> why, if it’s not a secret, you needed to know where besides spec vg93 Does Bla> apply? Yes, I’m looking closely to see if it’s possible to use a non-Spectrum emulsion to rip my head off from. %)

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> So what I’m telling you is that it’s a programmer, because... slang Bla> you don’t know the apparatchiks. Or do you think that the whole world turns the same way Bla> around your knowledge? :) These same apparatchiks were sitting at the next table - and no fantasies like I haven’t heard “dad-board” or “grandfather-board” from them - so your slang is not apparatchik slang. Actually, I also strongly doubt that you are real ever had anything to do with iron workers ;)

From Anton Yakovlev To All 18 January 2007

Hello, icebear bc - suxx!

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Shaos to Shaos; I; I understand that you are not a computer scientist, but only a programmer, but you don’t be upset - each type of activity has its own incomprehensible terminology for beginners :). It's not scary :) - if you work hard, you'll learn :).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> I strongly doubt that you have ever had any relationship with real metal workers Sha> relation Don't be upset :) - "There are many friends of Horatio that we never even dreamed of to the sages.." I think this is not the last news in your life :). Live a century - a century learn :).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> programmed for five years So what I’m telling you is that a programmer, because... not apparatchik slang you know. Or do you think that the whole world revolves around your knowledge? :) A microRS, by the way, is not at all what was discussed, so you’re not even close you have an idea of what you are talking about.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> maybe someone still doesn’t understand - I’m doing explanatory work :) Susanin’s laurels don’t let you sleep? :) Come on, he ended badly :).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> I personally have long understood everything :):):) Oh? If it were clear, I wouldn’t write nonsense in this thread. :) :) :)

From Mike To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> look carefully at what kind of microcircuits are there, if you are talking about PC Bla> controllers. Do you think that I’m completely blind or mentally retarded and can’t distinguish numbers? Naturally, I looked more than once before speaking. If there is time, I'll take special photos.

From Mike To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Well, do it, although you could say so - it would be faster, why do such Bla> are you tense? And I told you, twice at that.

From Andreas Kaiser To All 18 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> These same apparatchiks were sitting at the next table - and no fantasies Sha> like “father-board” or “grandfather-board” I haven’t heard from them - so yours Sha> slang is not the slang of the apparatchiks. Actually, I also strongly Sha> I doubt that you have ever had anything to do with real iron workers Sha> ;) "Grandfather-board" - THIS IS 5!!!! :v2_clapp; 2BC:; When you voiced this strange term here for the first time, I specifically looked I googled and didn’t find anything other than a cool drawing. Where does the term come from? Slang? Well It's not serious, I can do it too. My computer consists of a lot of kuini buzzes, and another one that is warming itself, and together they stand on another rather large ku.... Also slang. Is the hint clear?

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> to Shaos; I; I understand that you are not a computer scientist, but only a programmer, but Bla> don't be upset - every type of activity has its own Bla> terminology incomprehensible to beginners :). It's not scary :) - you'll take care of yourself Bla> - you will learn :). Yes, I’m just a jack of all trades: RTF UPI issue 1996 - VMKSS you know this one specialty? Computers, complexes, systems and networks deciphered. I am your so-called "phaserboards" called MicroPC from octagon, advantech and fastvel programmed for five years before moving to the states set sail, so I know what I'm saying - unlike you. :v2_finge:

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Don't be upset :) - "There are many friends of Horatio who are not Bla> our sages dreamed.." I think this is not the last news in your Bla> life :). Live forever and learn :). Yes, I don’t really give a damn - consider yourself at least the most hardware-based Russian apparatchik - I personally have understood everything for a long time :rolleyes:

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> :):):) Oh? If it were clear, I wouldn’t write nonsense in this thread. :) :) Bla> :) Well, maybe someone else doesn’t understand - I’m carrying out explanatory work so that they don’t thoughtlessly ;)

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Mike Mik> I’ll take special photos Well, do it, although you could say it like that - it would be faster, why such a strain? As it turned out, a person needs an emulsion and not a piece of hardware :).

From Andreas Kaiser To All 18 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Firstly, you didn’t ask about the term, you asked about the standard, and I Bla> answered you - there is no such standard. I asked you then “what is this and where can I read about it?” Neither about the term nor I didn’t even ask about the standard (by the way, you started about the standard then soar). Bla> I didn’t specifically study the question of etymology, although I did say Bla> have you ever come across a term in the user manual for some computer Bla> (I highly suspect that it was for Nixdof Computer - it was a long time ago, I don’t remember). It’s clear that we’re in the water. Bla> The term is commonly used among computer scientists (service, sales). If you Bla> If you don’t know him, it means you simply have nothing to do with this industry. B Bla> slang has been present for a long time, at least 15 years Tell me about service/sales in 1992! Bla> and denotes the execution of the processor module as an ISA controller. Bla> There was no standard for such a construct, just as it did not exist Bla> for example, the standard LPX form factor and everyone sculpted it as they wanted. Bla> This was expressed in additional connectors besides standard ISA. HereBla> such boards were called “phaserboards”. Now a similar performance Bla> is standardized, but after ISA there is still PCI attached, called Bla> PICMG 1.0 format, but I wasn’t talking about it, but about that old one Bla> non-standardized version exclusively with ISA connectors. It's all water. Not interesting. Do you know why it's called Motherboard? You know male/female connectors, think about where the name Fatherboard could have come from.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello Mike Mik> that's what I told you tell me the markings or better show them in the photo, not your opinion what you think this is it. ice> Where does the term come from? Firstly, you didn’t ask about the term, you asked about the standard, and I answered you - there is no such standard. I didn’t specifically study the question of etymology, although I told you that I once came across the term in the user manual for some computer (I highly suspect that it was for Nixdof Computer - it was a long time ago, I don’t remember). Term commonly used among computer scientists (service, sales). If you don't know him - it means you simply have nothing to do with this industry. Has been present in slang for a long time, at least 15 years old, and denotes the execution of the processor module as an ISA controller. There was no standard for such a design, nor For example, there was a standard for LPX form factor and everyone sculpted it as they wanted. This was expressed in additional connectors besides standard ISA. These are the boards and were called "phaserboards". Nowadays, such a design is standardized in industrial computer, but after ISA there is still PCI attached there, the format is called PICMG 1.0, but I wasn’t talking about him, but specifically about that old non-standardized performance exclusively with ISA connectors.

From Alexander Zan To All 18 January 2007

Hello, boo_boo boo> Yes, I’m looking closely to see if it’s possible to use a non-Spectrum emulsion for a header boo> poke %) You can also dig around in the MSX emulators (there should be WD1793 or WD2793 which is basically the same thing http://zx.pk.ru/showthread.php?t=2092)

From Stanislav Lomakin To All 18 January 2007

Hello fan fan> You can also dig into MSX emulators (there should be WD1793 fan> or WD2793 which is basically the same thing fan> http://zx.pk.ru/showthread.php?t=2092) Oh! tnx, in bluemsx I found a very sane wd2793 at first glance :)

From Anton Yakovlev To All 18 January 2007

Hello icebear Bla> If you are interested in the modern development of such performance - read Bla> PICMG 1.0 format, there was no standard for the old version. links? Where?! I don't see... :o

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello icebear ice> Tell me about the service/sale in 1992! :) It's a long story :) ice> male/female connectors Have you decided to discuss etymological roots? Is there anything to discuss there? How is it different? dad from mom? :) If you are interested in the modern development of such performance, read the format PICMG 1.0, there was no standard for the old version.

From Evgeny Muchkin To All 18 January 2007

Hello, scl^mc scl> bc - suxx! scl> What does this mean?

From Valery Tkachuck To All 18 January 2007

Hello, scl^mc scl> links? Where?! I don’t see... Well, I’ll also tell you how to use the search engine.. :)

From Valery Tkachuck To All 19 January 2007

Hello, scl^mc scl> got a turbo 86m computer, maybe it has it? What are you even asking about? Do you need a car with a fatherboard?

From Anton Yakovlev To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> well, tell you how to use the search engine.. :) it’s just that if a person talks about something that others are hearing about for the first time, it’s not bad not to send it to search engines (otherwise I can also go to various other places send :D), and support your words with links to sources where this information was gleaned. otherwise the opinion arises that it comes from somewhere from the ceiling. ps. I got a turbo 86m computer, maybe it has it?

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> ...Has been present in slang for a long time, at least 15 years, and means Bla> execution of the processor module in the form of an ISA controller. Standard Bla> such a construct did not exist, just as it did not exist, for example Bla> standard LPX form factor and everyone sculpted it as they wanted. This was expressed Bla> in additional connectors besides standard ISA. These are the boards and Bla> were called "phaserboards". Now a similar performance Bla> is standardized in industrial computers, but after ISA there is also PCI attached there Bla> is called the PICMG 1.0 format, but I wasn’t talking about it, but about that Bla> old non-standardized version exclusively with ISA connectors. Damn, stubborn huh... The standard of what you stubbornly call “papaboard” called MicroPC (already said in another topic - but you ignored me) - introduced by Octagon [http://www.octagonsystems.com/products/6030.aspx] back in 1990 - a motherboard in the form of an ISA8 card (later from Advantech [http://www.advantech.com/products/Model_Detail.asp?model_id=1-1TGYCC&BU=ACG&PD =] was in the form of ISA16 - but already under the name SlotPC). Also processor boards in MicroPC format was produced by the Russian company Fastwel[http://www.prosoft.ru/products/brands/fastwel/micropc/micropccpu/]: Picture: http://www.prosoft.ru/content/images/239138$%5B500x0%5D.jpg P.S. I have not seen ISA together with PCI at the same time in industrial computers - rather everything is again the fruit of your unbridled imagination (industrial processor modules with only a PCI connector on the side are made according to the CompactPCI standard - again past the "daddy board").

From Grand To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat dea> In all computers that had 5.25" 720Kb drives (with support dea> double density, MFM recording method) dea> in all “our” computers like EC1841, Iskra (I don’t remember the number), dea> MS electronics (I don’t remember the number, from UKNC), etc. it was VG93, dea> because Soviet industry has not mastered other controllers. Machines "Electronics MS 0507" [http://mix.wol.bz/photos/ms050702.jpg] to your time were equipped with an MFM controller KMD (device MY:) in which there is no There was no VG93. But in "Electronics 60" there was a disk controller of the DZ device:, VG93 was really present there.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 19 January 2007

Hello Shaos Comrade SCH Shaos simply amazes me :):):) with his efforts to refute :). I'll have to take pity and give a link, since I myself can't find the phaserboard in PICMG 1.0 format in the same fastvel :):):) : http://www.fastwel.ru/products/344802/345314.html

From Valery Tkachuck To All 19 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> where is the word "phaserboard" written there? :) read post 45

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Comrade SCH Shaos simply amazes me :):):) with his efforts Bla> refutation :). I'll have to take pity and give you a link if I can find it myself Bla> cannot phaserboard in PICMG 1.0 format in the same fastvel :):):) : Bla> http://www.fastwel.ru/products/344802/345314.html Wow, PICMG is not a figment of BC's imagination! But this is not the only possible option. execution of industrial computers with a connector, as you wrote above, but rather a rare exception (several different types of connectors in a row is nonsense). A Now attention to the question - where is the word “phaserboard” written there?

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> :) read post 45 Let's not bother quoting the works of the great you, but just say that there is no such thing as a fatherboard in nature, but these are called processor boards with an ISA connector in simple words MicroPC (I even attached a photo to your previous message, but you ignored it). By the way, I asked about where on the page with the description of the fastvel board your favorite PICMG 1.0 standard says that this is the one "phaserboard", and not at all where in your endless delirium are you you come up with and standardize this definition.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 19 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> we will not engage in quoting don’t bother, I’ll drum for you :), you got to the bottom of it with your refutation, and not me before you :). Do you have an inferiority complex a la Salieri? Go to psychoanalyst, in NY they should be like uncut dogs (or like lawyers) :). If you are not satisfied with your ignorance of geek slang build a model of the egocentric universe and declare that everything you don’t know is does not exist (there was already one figure here who declared everyone around to be machinations matrix :)) or announce that everyone around you is a lamer and only you are d'Artagnan :) - do it whatever you want, I’m not interested in your fuss.

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> If you are not satisfied with your ignorance of computer slang yeah - I don’t know exactly lamer slang ;)

From Andrey Alexandrovich Titov To All 19 January 2007

Hello Grand dea> Firstly, I haven’t written about PC anywhere, and secondly, in all “ours” dea> computer type EC1841, Iskra (I don’t remember the number), MS Electronics (no number dea> I remember, from UKNC), etc. it was VG93, because other controllers dea> Soviet industry has not mastered. In UKNC (Electronics MS-511) the controller is not based on VG93, but on KR1801VP1-128 :v2_wink2:

From Mike To All 19 January 2007

Hello Shaos Sha> P.S. I have never seen ISA and PCI at the same time in industrial computers Sha> - most likely, again, the fruit of your unbridled imagination Sha> (industrial processor modules only with a PCI connector on the side Sha> are made according to the CompactPCI standard - again bypassing the "papaboard"). Well then, it’s my imagination, because... I talked about this. Not about dad-grandfather-board, but about ISA + PCI. Such machines are still produced in large quantities, I have about a dozen of them at work right now.

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 19 January 2007

Hello Mike Mik> Well then, it’s my imagination, because... I talked about this. Not about Mik> father-grandfather-board, but about ISA + PCI. Such machines are still produced today Mik> there are a lot of them, I only have them at work right now Mik> ten. Well, BC showed me the link, proving that they exist ;) At one time I didn’t even have time to work with CompactPCI - requests from our company MicroPC (ISA8) and SlotPC (ISA16) were completely covered

From Anton Yakovlev To All 19 January 2007

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> what are you even asking about? Do you need a car with a fatherboard? no, blah. I ask: THE COMPUTER "TURBO 86M" MAY HAVE ANALOGUE 1818VG93