Kerners vs linkers
ZXNet echo conference «code.zx»
Hello, captain cobalt
the survey was written incorrectly
a dynamic linker can be assembled based on the kernal, even for speck
so I won't vote for anything
Hello, yoko_ono
yok> Oh! Create your own and vote there! =)
+1 :-D
Hello, All
The purpose of this sociological survey is to compile lists of names.
There is no need to discuss anything here. Everything has been discussed many times.
Hello,GriV
Gri> incorrect survey
Gri> the dynamic linker can be compiled based on the kernel, even
Gri> for speck
Gri> so I won’t vote for anything
Oh! Create your own and vote there! =)
Hello, psndcj
But they vote, and there are leaders)
In the end, the protests above fit the "implementation details" point, or I don't
Do you understand?
Hello, captain cobalt
Protests do not fit any of the criteria.
That's why they don't vote.
It is important for me that the “kernalists” vote for their item. :)
Hello, captain cobalt
In fact, even the wording of the question is left-wing. It's the same as in the topic "Back to
USSR" there would be a vote like:
1) Capitalism
2) Democracy
3) Communism (free education, free medicine, everyone is happy and
young)
4) Other
Hence the moral is to remove the clarification (“aka JP table”) from the survey item and place
post with detailed descriptions of the pros and cons of each method. Who doesn't want this?
Enough is enough - they will vote for “other” or “implementation is unimportant.”
Hello Vitamin
in general, I have already described all the pros and cons of each technique in
http://zx.pk.ru/showthread.php?t=1811 or more precisely this
http://zx.pk.ru/showpost.php?p=31642&postcount=76 message