Question
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
From Kirill Frolov → To All 13 December 1998
It was 11 Dec 98 and 01:26:00, Dmitry Lomov wrote to Kirill Frolov
on the topic Question
Not seeing a moderator nearby, I decided to insert a word:
DL> before that, check the system for correctness, and then just
DL> subtract. STORM does this.
It calls most of the disks 'not valid'.
What if the floppy disk has 3000 sectors?
With best wishes, Kirill Frolov.
From Kirill Frolov → To All 13 December 1998
RP>> The second one seems to be more reliable, but is it so common that there is incorrect information in the 8
RP>> sector?
PF> This case can only occur after a MOVE interruption. Therefore
PF> it is better to determine in sector 8 - faster.
What will happen if _accidentally_ the information was damaged there? For example, disk
error? Files will be killed.
From Pavel Fedin → To All 15 December 1998
KF> What will happen if the information was _accidentally_ damaged?
KF> For example, disk error? The files will be killed.
If the information there is accidentally damaged, then they don’t work with such a disk.
More precisely, on the contrary, they work with it intensively. At the doctor. :-)
Bye, with a pack of vicious, Pavel Fedin.
... UI125:/0EPJFAGAECCVNGLFHGiGDGFFFPAFfBCKBRRDQCBKHIEBCCKC
From Roman Petrov → To All 16 December 1998
On Tuesday December 15 1998 Pavel Fedin wrote to Kirill Frolov:
PF> If the information there is accidentally damaged, then they will not work with such a disk
PF>. More precisely, on the contrary, they are working hard with him. At the doctor. :-)
Come on, this is not such a common operation. This is only necessary when creating a file.
Bye, Pavel! With the best wishes, Megus of Brainwave.
[Team ZX-Spectrum] [Team NeOS] [Team Rock'n'Roll forever]
From Kirill Frolov → To All 17 December 1998
PF> If the information is accidentally damaged there, then they do not work with such a disk.
PF> More precisely, on the contrary, they work with it intensively. At the doctor. :-)
Do they look with their hands and eyes? In the emulator...
PF> -+- Spot 1.3b #118
Well, you’re not seriously using any programs on the Spectrum.
From Kirill Frolov → To All 18 December 1998
PF>> Therefore,
PF>> it is better to determine by 8 sectors - faster.
KS> In general, reliability is better for programs than speed, because because of
KS> the unreliability of your program, people will not use it.
Complete nonsense has been written about speed. Calculating in the catalog or looking in the 8
sector is almost the same time, only you need to read more from the disk. But if
the directory is cached, then there will be no problems.
From Pavel Fedin → To All 21 December 1998
PF>> More precisely, on the contrary, they are working hard on him. At the doctor. :-)
KF> Do they look with their hands and eyes? In the emulator...
What does the emulator have to do with it?