ïÐÒÏÓ
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
From Igor Merzliakov → To All 15 June 2004
Questionnaire for echo conference participants Real.speccy
1. Your initials, city, address (email, Fido, etc.)
2. How old are you?
3. How are things going with Spectrum in your city?
4. List your favorite games on the spec and rate their quality as a
percentage.
5. Name the Spectrumists who, in your opinion, are still working for the benefit of Spectrum.
6. Which of all the parties held was the most successful? Why?
7. List the most needed software on the Spectrum.
8. Which of all Spectrum brands turned out to be the most successful in terms of configurations?
9. How much time do you devote to Spectrum?
10. What future do you see for Spectrum?
Now let's move away from Spectrum.
11. Do you love music? Which (groups, styles)?
12. Do you believe in God?
13. Who is Altshul?
14. Where is “Perpetual Motion Machine” found?
15. Who is Adam? Monkey or man?
16. What is "Rock music"?
17. Likewise, pop music.
18. When and from what will humanity die?
19. How did the world begin?
20. How did it develop?
21. Is the essence of existence knowable?
22. Theory and practice. What is more important?
23. Decipher: "KOZHZGSF".
24. Who is the strongest on Earth? Who's the smartest? Who is the most beautiful? Who is the most
unnecessary?
25. Write the stupidest code you've ever come across.
Send it to me, or just send it to meэху.
Bye!
From Kirill Frolov → To All 17 June 2004
On Tue, 15 Jun 04 18:44:24 +0400, Igor Merzliakov wrote:
IM> Questionnaire for echo conference participants Real.speccy
Let's arrange a rewrite in the echo!
IM> Now let's move away from the Spectrum.
The steering wheel is somewhere nearby...
IM> Send it to me, or just in echo.
Just make sure that SU.KASCHENKO.LOCAL is in the Area (Newsgroup) field.
From Sergei Dubarev → To All 19 June 2004
Tue Jun 15 2004, 19:44,
Igor Merzliakov -> All:
I liked this question the most:
IM> 25. Write the stupidest code you have ever
IM> encountered.
Please.
for i:= 1 to 4 do
case i of
1: [here we are doing something];
2: [we are doing something here];
3: [we are doing something here];
4: [we are doing something here];
end;
Occurred in a commercial product.
WBR, Sergei Dubarev
Background sound: Morcheeba - Charango
From Andrew V. Miheev → To All 21 June 2004
> IM> 25. Write the stupidest code you have ever
> IM> encountered.
> Please.
>
> for i:= 1 to 4 do
> case i of
> 1: [doing something here];
> 2: [doing something here];
> 3: [doing something here doing];
> 4: [doing something here];
> end;
>
> Found in a commercial product.
From Sergei Dubarev → To All 22 June 2004
AM> And why is he stupid? If, for example, in body 1: something
AM> of type i:=3 is conditionally executed, in body 2: again conditionally i:=1 and so on, then how else
AM> can this be implemented? Via GOTO? Any other ideas? I myself often make finite state machines without any GOTO.
There were no conditional executions there. At all. It’s just neatly written down
what would have been done sequentially anyway. Why else would I give an example? :)))
WBR, Sergei Dubarev
Background sound: Red Hot Chili Peppers - Around The World