.SCL

ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»

From Evgeny Goljakov To All 7 January 2001

*cross in ZXNET.SOFT

Hello, all.
Sun 7 Jan 00 Dmitriy Nesmachny -> Sergey Orlov:
...
DN> Can you also attach the *.SCL converter? Is it really difficult to want
DN>? Not everyone here has a PC. :-F

In the description of GODZILLA, the author wrote that it supports
subject format, maybe I'm wrong, but this feature doesn't work for me... Who
will enlighten me?


Thank you for your attention.

From Alexei Bugai To All 10 January 2001

_/Peace unto you, Evgeny!_/

07 Jan 01 05:06, Evgeny Goljakov wrote to all about ".SCL":

DN>> Will you also include the *.SCL converter? Is it really difficult to want
DN>>? Not everyone here has a PC. :-F
EG> In the description of GODZILLA, the author wrote that it supports
EG> the subject format,

He wrote that it will support :)

EG> maybe I’m wrong, but this feature doesn’t work for me...
EG> Who can enlighten me?

We’ll have to sit down somehow and finish,
half of the work is already done anyway...

_/With best wishes, Squizer!/_

>>> [xpro...@softhome.net] [icq:17425411] [ZX] [Ukraine RC5 Team]
... Trust no one, deny everything!

From Yuri Potapov To All 10 January 2001

EG> In the description of GODZILLA, the author wrote that it supports
EG> subject format, maybe I'm wrong, but this feature doesn't
EG> work for me... Who
EG> can enlighten me?

Can I throw an Extracter here?

Sincerely yours, Yuri /I \
\ZX/

From Valerij Kozhevnikoff To All 11 January 2001

AB> Somehow we’ll have to sit down and finish everything,
AB> half of the work has already been done anyway...

Right now we’ll kick you. =)
Finish it quickly.


WBR, Jason.

[Team Obituary][Team Friday 13th][Team Evil Maniacs][Team Huge Axes]

From Evgeny Goljakov To All 12 January 2001

EG>> supports the subject format,

AB> Wrote that it will support :)

sometimes it’s convenient to use foreign languages for descriptions :)

...
AB> We’ll have to sit down and finish everything somehow,
AB> half the work has already been done anyway...

wish: IMHO I would like not to see more there graphics
(in the form of boys picking their noses) and a manual inside,
and load 2 functions in its place:

1. auto search for $ (immediately after loading) and their disposal
2. at the end of step 1, autorun the file by name
from the setup


Thank you for your attention.

From Dmitriy Nesmachny To All 16 January 2001


Hello, Alexei!

Friday 12 Jan 2001 09:13:57, Evgeny Goljakov -> Alexei Bugai:


EG> wish: IMHO I would like not to see any more graphics
EG> (in the form of boys picking their noses) and a manual inside,
EG> and load 2 functions in its place:

EG> 1. auto-search for $ (immediately after loading) and their disassembly
EG> 2. at the end of step 1, auto-launch of a file named
EG> from the setup

IMHO it’s not like that: when we finally settle down with the whole world with the standard
definition of work in automatic mode, we will have to do the following:
define an automaton/gui, if gui - then as now, and if automatic, then search
all hobets/scrolls, promotion if space allows, erasing promoted
raw materials, writing a log file, exiting to TRDOS ROM at address #0000.

Sincerely, Dmitriy.

From Evgeny Goljakov To All 24 January 2001

DN> IMHO it’s not so: when we finally settle down with the whole world with
DN> the standard for determining work in automatic mode, we need
DN> to do the following: determine the machine/gui, if the guy is -
DN> then the same as now, and if it’s an automaton, then search for all
DN> hobets/scrolls, promotion if space allows, erasing
to catch up there is an opinion: ^^^^^^^^
not erasing, but rewriting to the same place + writing 1 sector
dummy file (or log file) so as not to movie again.

DN> of promoted raw materials, recording a log file, output to TRDOS ROM at
DN> address #0000.

and the rest everything fits

DN> Sincerely, Dmitriy.
Thank you for your attention.

From Dmitriy Nesmachny To All 26 January 2001

EG> to catch up, there is an opinion: ^^^^^^^^
EG> not erasing, but overwriting to the same place + writing 1 sector
EG> dummy file (or log file) so as not to movie again.

Oh, this is to write the destroyed file to the old place, but to the remaining extra
sector (since the desired file is always exactly larger than the original per one sector)
write another one-sector dummy file with the name of the allocated file
purely in the directory? By moving the descriptors down and increasing the file and deleted
files counter by one? Is it?

Sincerely, Dmitriy.

From Alexei Bugai To All 27 January 2001

DN>> hobet/scroll, promotion if space allows, erasing
EG> to catch up there is an opinion: ^^^^^^^^
EG> not erasing, but rewriting to the same place + writing 1 sector
EG> dummy file (or log file) so as not to delete an extra one times.

An interesting option.
I’ll probably do it soon...

P.S. If there are other proposals, then it’s better to say them
now :)