Tracker...

My on-board systems found that on Wednesday October 13, 2004 20:36, Eugene
Sobolev wrote by Alexander Smirnov:

ES> Is this a question? I know it badly, I like digibyster better.
What kind of program is this?
ES> Everything you see in front of you is your tool for creating
ES> your own unique samples. For example, slide, I'm sorry,
ES> glide, I'm sorry again, glissando. There is a tone that
ES> can be up/down; here/here; up/down;. There are generators
ES> of white noise, volume and envelope. And most importantly, there are
ES> modules from KS and Vaxan, where it’s so nice to steal tools
Is this an offer to pick other people’s modules? F)
ES>(Love will tell you about this better).
Okay, thanks for that.
ES> There is a very sensible description, which everyone has always had enough of.
ES> However, there is a principle according to which, if something doesn’t work out
ES> to use, then it’s not really necessary. You too now. Then
ES> you'll look at someone else and use it.
It's funny, but I have an order of magnitude more
information on the basics of musical grammar than on this editor. :)
Sincerely, Alexander Smirnov.

October 14, 2004 23:58, Alexander Smirnov -> Eugene Sobolev:

ES>> I know her badly, I like digibyster better.
AS> What kind of program is this?

256-channel tracker, with some mixing capabilities,
sound processing and even score mode. As a last resort
octamed - it exists in two versions. One is in the spirit of a pro-tracker - 4
channels/8 bits and the other is akin to a digibuster.
A purely studio thing. There is a score mode there too, but it’s kind of
strange.. So, in 8-bit sound an octamed tracker is more convenient.
In 24-bit sound - a digibuster. But I don’t recognize the pro-tracker, even though he
is the founder. What does Spectrum have to do with it? As potentially future
Amizhniks, it is useful for you to know where your legs come from. =)

ES>> And the most important thing is that there are modules from KS and Vaxan, where is it so
ES>> it’s nice to steal tools
AS> Is this an offer to pick other people’s modules? G)

Of course. There is nothing wrong with that.

AS> It’s funny, but I have an order of magnitude more
AS> information on the basics of musical grammar than on this editor. :)

And that's okay. In FIDO, musical literacy is MUSIC.THEORY, and
the moderator there is the old pop singer LAV.

... aGGreSSor^tPA (http://amitrans.narod.ru)

ES> Everything you see in front of you is your tool for creating
ES> your own unique samples. For example, slide, I'm sorry,
ES> glide, I'm sorry again, glissando. There is a tone that
ES> can be up/down; here/here; up/down;. There are white noise generators
ES>, volume and envelope. And most importantly, there are
ES> modules from KS and Vaxan, from where it is so nice to steal tools

My on-board systems have detected that on Thursday October 21, 2004 23:04,
Aleksey Katrook wrote to Eugene Sobolev:

ES>> instruments (Love will tell you about this better).
Is he still here?
AK> Does anyone have documentation on to the truckers? I mean, I'm interested
There's not enough information in those descriptions. I can try to send you what I have with soap. If the soap passes...
AK> find out what all the commands in the sample editor do. Also
AK> all sorts of effects. I'm very interested to know how the sound of
AK> bass is made.
Bass?
Maybe Ivan Roshchin knows?
Sincerely, Alexander Smirnov.

ES> Of course. There is nothing wrong with that.
I see. And it’s much more interesting to make the tools yourself.

ES> And that’s okay. In FIDO, musical literacy is MUSIC.THEORY, and
ES> the moderator there is the old pop singer LAV.
Let's go and have a look.
Sincerely, Alexander Smirnov.