description of .pkt format

In short, you didn’t tell me anything new. then a specific question. where are message
attributes stored in .pkt? With .msg everything is clear - there are 2 bytes. After all, the tosser somehow
knows what needs to be sent, for example, a confirmation of receipt or reading.
Where is this written?
I’m interested in where the mark is that there is an attach
file attached to the .pkt. how to find out, if this is possible at all?

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

20 May 02 22:05, Sergey Zotov wrote to All:

SZ> in short, you didn’t tell me anything new. then a specific question. where
SZ> are message attributes stored in .pkt?

pkt is a bunch of letters glued together and nothing more, THIS IS NOT A LETTER!

SZ> with .msg everything is clear - there are 2 bytes.

Look there, in the letter, and not in the pkt header.

SZ> because the tosser somehow knows what needs to be sent, for example, a confirmation
SZ> about receiving or reading. where is this written down?

freq FTS-xxxx.zip, FSC-xxxx.zip from the nearest fidosh file dump.

SZ> I’m interested in where the mark is that there is a file attached to the .pkt
SZ> attach. how to find out if this is possible at all?

sourceforge -> husky project look.

Mon 20 May 2002, at 22:05:19 Sergey Zotov told All about the description of the .pkt format

SZ> I'm interested in where the mark is that the .pkt is attached
SZ> attach
SZ> file. how to find out, if this is possible at all?

In the chest, pressing the H button brings up a list of flags. You install File
attached to msg in it and compare the resulting program with the program without this flag.

Bye, Sergey.
WBR, Vivid^Brainwave.

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

SZ>> attach file is attached. how to find out if this is possible
SZ>> at all?

AM> In the chest, pressing the H button brings up a list of flags.

Are you kidding me?! :)

AM> You install File attached to msg in it and compare
AM> the resulting program with the program without this flag.

there are no differences in them!!!
this is alarming. either the .pkt doesn’t reflect anything, or Lara doesn’t reflect this
in the downloaded packages. in the second case you will have to scan all posts.p

Tue 21 May 2002, at 20:52:57 Sergey Zotov told Aleksey Malov about the description of the
.pkt format

SZ> so there are no differences in them!!!
SZ> this is alarming. either the .pkt doesn't reflect anything, or Lara doesn't reflect
SZ> this
SZ> in the uploaded packages. in the second case, you will have to scan all post.p

What if you create an empty PKT with the file attached flag checked using the data in the
.nfo file? Those. The .nfo file contains approximately the following information:

From: Aleksey Malov
FromAdr: 2:5052/30.8
Boss: 2:5052/30
To: Sergey Zotov
ToAdr: 2:5057/21.93
File: filename.ext
File: file2.ext
To: Ivan Ivanov
ToAdr: 2:5050/999.999
File: shit.jpg

The mailer scans the .nfo file and generates packets.

Or Lara needs to be edited.

Bye, Sergey.
WBR, Vivid^Brainwave.

AM> Or Lara needs to be edited.
Are you talking about uue attachments? IMHO, it’s still better to select files from the directory using an external
program, and not in Lara or a dialer

JTN/4D

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

On 22 May 02, Aleksey Malov wrote to Sergey Zotov:

AM> And if you create an empty folder with the file attached
AM> checkbox selected using
AM> data from the .nfo file? Those. The .nfo file contains approximately the following
AM> information:

[Killed.]

AM> The mailer scans the .nfo file and generates packets.

I didn’t like this idea before and I don’t like it now.

VK>> choose an external program, and not in Lara or a dialer

SZ> in any case, the soaper must be added. I need to know how to use .pkt to find out
SZ> whether a file is attached to it or not. otherwise you will have to scan the mail
SZ> database, because There is no .msg on Spec, i.e. Let's take offtopic as an analogue.

Well, take FTS, read FSC, look at the raw materials of stupid soapers!!!

SZ> anyway, the soap needs to be completed. I need to know how to use .pkt to find out whether a file is attached to
SZ> or not. otherwise you will have to scan the mail database, because... There is no .msg on
SZ> Spec
SZ>, i.e. Let's take offtopic as an analogue.
question: who will make yuyuki?

JTN/4D

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

SZ> The funny thing about the attachments is that the file is transferred one to one without any UU
SZ> coding.

The funny thing about the attachments is that they DO NOT ROOT. Only maybe within
one/another node,
but not across the entire network.

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

KF> The funny thing about attachments is that they DO NOT ROOT. Only maybe within
KF> one/another node,
KF> but not across the entire network.
why the hell are they needed then? It would be better if the juniper were external... well, I already wrote here
more than once...

JTN/4D

SZ>>> in any case, the soap needs to be completed. I need to know how to find out from the .pkt whether
SZ>>> the file is attached to
SZ>>> or not. otherwise you will have to scan the mail database, because
SZ>>> .msg is not available on Spec, i.e. Let's take offtopic as an analogue.

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

SZ> you surprise me! file transfer by mail will speed up by 33% because
SZ> files will be transferred 1 in 1.

If netsoap is not packaged by the archiver, then it is packaged by the modem. The acceleration
will be small.
And it makes no sense, usually it works within one or two nodes. It’s convenient for points on
one node
to throw a file like this, but then it’s easier to upload them directly.