ZXPRESS
ruseng

NAM v0.23b

ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»

From Sergey Cherbynin To All 11 July 2002

Greetings, All!

* Also sent to ZX.SPECTRUM.

Tell me, were there any subsequent versions of the subject mailer?
And is further work being done on it?

All the best, All!
Best wishes *** Sergey *** !

From Sergey Zotov To All 13 July 2002

A day has passed, and you are still alive! Sergey!

On 11 Jul 02, Sergey Cherbynin wrote to All:

SC> Tell me, were there any subsequent versions of the subject mailer?

the latest version is 0.33b

SC> And is there further work on it?

I sometimes do. I’ll finish attach (in fact, I’ve been doing it for a long time%)) and throw it in
ZXNet and real.speccy

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

From Vadim Chumachenko To All 13 July 2002

SZ> I lead sometimes. I’ll finish attach (in fact, I’ve been doing it for a long time %)) and
SZ> I’ll throw it in ZXNet and real.speccy

so will you throw it or will you throw it in ZXNet and real.speccy? :))

Sincerely, Vadim.

... [ winamp: silence /::/ http://etcm.h1.ru /::/ icq: 157.564.510 ]

From Sergey Tyurin To All 14 July 2002

SZ> I lead sometimes. I'll finish attach (in fact, I've been doing it for a long time %)) and
SZ> I'll throw it in ZXNet and real.speccy
We can't wait!!!
Will the glitch with the Bink/+ 3.1 flags be fixed?

With best wishes, Sergey. -= T(c)S =-
[tr...@aport2000.ru]

From Sergey Cherbynin To All 16 July 2002

SZ> I lead sometimes. I’ll finish attach (in fact, I’ve been doing it for a long time%)) and
SZ> I’ll throw
SZ> into ZXNet and real.speccy
We’ll be looking forward to it!

All the best, Sergey!

From Sergey Zotov To All 17 July 2002

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

From Sergey Zotov To All 17 July 2002

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

From Sergey Tyurin To All 20 July 2002

rTYCHEFUFCHHA FEVS, Sergey !

Wed 17 Jul 2002 06:56:23, Sergey Zotov -> Sergey Tyurin:

SC>>>> th CHEDEFUS MY DBMSHOEKYBS TBVPFB OBD OIN?
SZ>>> WITH CHADH YOPZDB. CHPF DPDEMBA attach (CHPPVEE S DBCHOP HCE EZP DEMB %) )
SZ>>> Y VTPYKH CH ZXNet Y real.speccy
ST>> tsDЈN OE DPTSDENUS !!!
ST>> b ZMAL U ZHMBZBNY Bink/+ 3.1 VHDEF RPZHYLUEO?
SZ> BUH... WITH OE OBYEM RPYUENH SING OE TBVPFBAF DT. U DT... DBCE X UEWS LFPF Bink
SZ> RPUFBCHYM. LBLYE ZHMBZY-FP?

chPF LKHUPUEL MPZB NPEZP UPEDYOEOYS U VPUUPN:
                                                               
# 02 Apr 15:30:09 BINK Connect 33600/Arq/V34/Lapm/V42Bis
* 02 Apr 15:30:36 BINK T(c)S office (2:5029/3.40@Fidonet)
* 02 Apr 15:30:36 BINK Remote Uses MelonMail 1.80/Noncommercial/Unregistred
: 02 Apr 15:30:36 BINK Sysop: Sergey Tyurin from Ryazan city, Russia
02 Apr 15:30:36 BINK Flags: MO,XA,V42B
^^^^^^^^^^
* 02 Apr 15:30:36 BINK Password-protected session
: 02 Apr 15:30:37 BINK EMSI method: ZedZip
^^^^^^
# 02 Apr 15:30:38 BINK Receiving L00362bb.PKT (2749b)
+ 02 Apr 15:30:40 BINK CPS: 1374 (2749 bytes) Efficiency: 47%
+ 02 Apr 15:30:40 BINK Received-Z \Exch\Inbound\Prot\L00362Bb.Pkt
* 02 Apr 15:30:41 BINK Giving for2:5029/3.40@Fidonet
# 02 Apr 15:30:43 BINK Sending \EXCH\OUTBOUND\13A50003.PNT\BF458698.TU0
(100372b)
+ 02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK CPS: 1433 (100372 bytes) Efficiency: 49%
+ 02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK Sent-Z \EXCH\OUTBOUND\13A50003.PNT\BF458698.TU0
02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK File \EXCH\OUTBOUND\13A50003.PNT\BF458698.TU0 truncated
* 02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK End of EMSI Session

From Sergey Zotov To All 22 July 2002

SZ>> uh... I didn’t find why they don’t work with each other... even at home
SZ>> I installed this Bink. what flags?

ST> Here is a piece of the log of my connection with the boss:
ST> ══════════════════════════════════════
ST> ═══════ # 02 Apr 15:30:09 BINK Connect 33600/Arq/V34/Lapm/V42Bis * 02
ST> Apr 15:30:36 BINK T(c)S office (2:5029/3.40@Fidonet) * 02 Apr 15:30:36
ST> BINK Remote Uses MelonMail 1.80/Noncommercial/Unregistred : 02 Apr
ST> 15:30:36 BINK Sysop: Sergey Tyurin from Ryazan city, Russia 02 Apr
ST> 15:30:36 BINK Flags: MO,XA,V42B
ST> ^^^^^^^^^^

everything is fine here. these are modem protocols and conventions, so to speak, and
not sessions.

ST> * 02 Apr 15:30:36 BINK Password-protected session
ST> : 02 Apr 15:30:37 BINK EMSI method: ZedZip
ST> ^^^^^^

and this protocol also holds NAM.

ST> # 02 Apr 15:30:38 BINK Receiving L00362bb.PKT (2749b)
ST> + 02 Apr 15:30:40 BINK CPS: 1374 (2749 bytes) Efficiency: 47%
ST> + 02 Apr 15:30:40 BINK Received-Z \Exch\Inbound\Prot\L00362Bb.Pkt
ST> * 02 Apr 15:30:41 BINK Giving for 2:5029/3.40@Fidonet
ST> # 02 Apr 15:30:43 BINK Sending \EXCH\OUTBOUND\13A50003.PNT\BF458698.TU0
ST> (100372b)
ST> + 02 Apr 15:31:53BINK CPS: 1433 (100372 bytes) Efficiency: 49%
ST> + 02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK Sent-Z \EXCH\OUTBOUND\13A50003.PNT\BF458698.TU0
ST> 02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK File \EXCH\OUTBOUND\13A50003.PNT\BF458698.TU0
ST> truncated * 02 Apr 15:31:53 BINK End of EMSI Session
ST> ══════════════════════════════════════ ══════════════════════════════════

i I don’t understand how Bind is different from everyone else. either it follows the laws of
EMSI too closely, or one of two things.

From Sergey Tyurin To All 25 July 2002

SZ> and this protocol is also supported by NAM.
SZ> I don’t understand how Bind differs from everyone else. or it follows too precisely
^ k ,)
SZ> EMSI laws, or one of two things.
So figure it out, if you've already got it, what's the bug? It’s necessary to fix it!!!
If it’s wrong, send me the source code, I’ll get to it... ;)
We need to finish a full-fledged Myler for Specky!!!

From Roman Milukov To All 26 July 2002

Hello Sergey!
25.07.2002 21:40:59, Sergey Tyurin wrote to Sergey Zotov:

ST> We need to complete a full-fledged soaper for Specky!!!

There are already a lot of soapers, but there is no node tosser.


Bye, Roman.

From Sergey Tyurin To All 27 July 2002

With best wishes, Sergey. -= T(c)S =-
[tr...@aport2000.ru]

From Maxim Latysh To All 27 July 2002

Once on 22 Jul 02 I read an opus in which
Sergey Zotov and Sergey Tyurin spoke on the topic of NAM v0.23b, I intervened:

SZ> I don’t understand how Bind is different from everyone else. or it too strictly follows
SZ> laws
SZ> EMSI, or one of two.


that for the Internet.


With respect, Maxony.

From Nikolaj Amosov To All 28 July 2002

ST> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Come on! Besides NAM and the pseudo-mail appendage in
ST> Melone, is there anything else?

Dickie

Nikolaj

From Igor Turashev To All 28 July 2002

ST> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Come on! Besides NAM and the pseudo-mail appendage in
ST> Melone, is there really anything else?
dickie under is-dos, and that’s all it seems...

...bye.Sergey! ...tigrr//bw::ceg
... Floorplay - Automatic (Organic mix) ...

From Sergey Zotov To All 28 July 2002

ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zx.fatal.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> SkyNet: 71:170/21

From Sergey Tyurin To All 31 July 2002

With best wishes, Sergey. -= T(c)S =-
[tr...@aport2000.ru]

From Sergey Tyurin To All 31 July 2002

ST>>>> We need to complete a full-fledged soaper for Specky!!!
RM>>> There are already a lot of soapers, but there is no node tosser.
ST>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Come on! Besides NAM and the pseudo-mail appendage in
ST>> Melone, is there anything else?