who knows?
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
Subject of how to put a completely Pnevsky int on the profik, the bug that was recently
thrown into ZX.SPECTRUM should not be offered because the position of the int and the clocks there are very close to
the stump, but the int is still slightly moved along X, on the test it looks something like this:
==========================|||||||||========================= int with that
firmware
============||||||||||========= Pnevsky int
Well, all the cartoons and border effects are also a little crazy.
Andrey was with you.
Tuesday November 24 1998 21:25, Andrey Isaev wrote -=All=-:
AI> Subject of how to put a completely Pnevsky int on the profik, which
AI> was recently thrown into ZX.SPECTRUM not to be offered because the position of int and ticks
AI> there are very close to the stump, but the int is still slightly moved along X, on the test
I could be wrong, of course, but there was some article in Oberon #3.
AI> Andrey was with you.
With respect, Alex Noman.
Subject, on boards version 5.02 it is possible to achieve synchronization with
Pnevsky int by replacing the RFK firmware or something else?
And in general, does such firmware exist or maybe someone was going to implement it?
╟─┤asta la vista !!!
[SG] [Clawfinger] [Megadeth] [SSAU] [ZX] [Beer]
√ E-mail: w...@chat.ru <-> POWer/WDG
╟─┤asta la vista !!!
[SG] [Clawfinger] [Megadeth] [SSAU] [ZX] [Beer]
√ E-mail: w...@chat.ru <-> POWer/WDG
Once on 27 Nov 98 at 12:04:10 there was a conflict
Alex Noman and Andrey Isaev were arguing about the topic, who knows?
I decided to continue this dialogue:
AI>> Subject of how to put a completely Pnevsky int on the profik, which was recently thrown into ZX.SPECTRUM not to be offered because the position of int and ticks
AI>> there are very close to the stump but the int is still slightly moved along X, on the test
AN> I could be wrong, of course, but in Oberon #3 there was some article.
Is this article here or in the soap?
AN> * Origin: Oberon station (2:5057/18.21)
^^^^^^ don’t say that no :)
Andrey was with you.
OP> Subject, on boards version 5.02 it is possible to achieve synchronization with
OP> Pnevsky int by replacing the RFK firmware or something else?
OP> And in general, does such firmware exist or maybe someone was going to implement
OP> it?
Yes, it exists and I think I have it, I’m not sure if it’s for the fifth boards, but
since personnel and personnel are formed there separately lowercase pulses, we can
assume that this is specifically for fives, should we throw it here?
Andrey was with you.
AI> Is this article here or in the soap?
A week ago I left all the articles from Arr #3. :( I didn’t think that they would be useful. Now
the OBR5 archive lives there.
AN>> + Origin: Oberon station (2:5057/18.21)
AI> ^^^^^^ don’t say that it’s not there :)
OP said that this was an option for boards of 3 versions. If memory serves, it all
came down to cutting roads and throwing a couple of wires.
OP> with Pnevsky int replacing the RFK firmware or what else? And in general,
OP> does such firmware exist or maybe someone was going to implement it?
ChungSoftware used to do this. Now, apparently, they are changing the firmware on the PC.
OP> ╟─┤asta la vista !!!
With respect, Alex Noman.
OP>> synchronization with
OP>> Pnevsky int replacing the RFK firmware or something else?
OP>> And in general, does such firmware exist or maybe someone
OP>> was going to implement
OP>> it?
AI> Yes, it exists and I think I have it, I’m not sure that it is
AI> for the fifth boards, but
AI> since personnel and personnel are separately formed there lowercase
AI> impulses, can
AI> assume that this is specifically for fives, throw it here?
Aha! Plizz! If possible... I'm dying without multicolors :((
OP>> Subject, on boards version 5.02 it is possible to achieve
OP>> synchronization
OP>> with Pnevsky int by replacing the RFK firmware or what else? And
OP>> in general,
OP>> does such firmware exist or maybe someone was going to
OP>> implement it?
AN> ChungSoftware used to do this. Now, apparently, it is changing
AN> the firmware on the PC.
We know... we know... Kiril Gromov...
And here I found one of his notes about the firmware:
"..."Fifth" version The board brought me a very pleasant surprise. Due to the fact that WAIT signals from the video controller are generated in the processor circuit, the result is perfect synchronization. I have never seen anything like this before! In all the “critical” programs, ALL border effects are COMPLETELY the same, ALL MULTICOLORs work, and the famous SHOCK MEGADEMO works so perfectly that I sat spellbound for minutes. five, not believing what was happening. Apparently, this was due to the fact that the asynchronous circuitry used in the latest version, in SPECTRUM mode, made it possible to achieve complete emulation of the “opaque” bus of the proprietary ZX SPECTRUM. All this gives me the right to say that today “PROFI” version 5.03 is the most successful and
compatible model of a commercially produced computer. Naturally, owners of already
purchased boards of all versions cancontact me for modifications to their
computer...."
Gromov Kirill (c) CHUNG Software (FFC)
He also writes there that he has already developed the RFK firmware "SAM14CS" for versions
of boards 5.xx
2All: has anyone seen it? Plizzzzzzzzzz if you have it!
P.S. but here it confuses me the phrase "... full emulation of the "opaque" tire
_branded_ ZX SPECTRUM...", but our standard is Pentagon :(