M_K or G_S? (modem connection)

Tell me which modem connection diagram is better: Kondratiev
or Shepelev?
When there were problems, I installed both on the board. Now I want
to remove the excess, but I don’t know which one to leave.

All the best.
Sergey.

One day Fri 2 Jun 2000 at 20:16:31 comrade Sergey Ignatov noticed comrade
All about , where I intervened:

SI> Tell me which modem connection scheme is better: Kondratiev
SI> or Shepelev?
SI> When there were problems, I installed both on the board. Now I want
SI> to remove the excess, but I don’t know which one to leave.

Which mailer you use, leave it under that one. MK for Dickie, GS for NAM...

The only difference is in the support for interrupts from the modem - in the MK circuit they are, but in the
GS circuit - only in the drawings and from some craftsmen :)
And the latter option is implemented on the INT processor, it is simply mixed
through a transistor (type KT315) to the standard int50Hz: from the modem connector
irq4 through 1kOhm to the base, emitter to ground, collector to the processor along with
the old
signal. The option is primitive, but it works, although there are drawbacks.
Software support for the GS circuit with interruptions will be less than for MK -
NAM and a terminal like Melon (the terminal is handled by R-Soft, 2:461/1024.6),
both programs are not finished and exist in beta demo versions, but the process is underway :)

In any case, it all comes down to the first line of my letters.

With the best, Sergey!

... I will buy a cerebral cortex prosthesis with firmware against hangovers.

I have Kondratiev, everyone in 5052 has Kondratiev, a little “modified”
Ark - buffers were added and it was assembled on ID7, everything works fine for more than
a year... And there is more prog for it.

Well, bye! Tigrr from -■Brainwave^X-Project■-

DD> Whatever mailer you use, leave it under that one. MK for
DD> Dickie, GS for NAM...

I use Melon 1.80s

DD> The only difference is in the support for interrupts from the modem - in the MK
DD> circuit they are, and in the
DD> GS circuit - only in the drawings and from some craftsmen :)

What are the advantages of a circuit with interruptions (if any)?
Ma 14400 modem and 3.5 MHz processor, both schemes work the same.
Perhaps the potential capabilities are higher (in a turbo and on a faster
modem)?

DD> Software support for the GS circuit with interruptions will be
DD> less than for MK -
DD> NAM and a terminal like Melon (the terminal is handled by R-Soft,
DD> 2:461/1024.6),
DD> both programs are not finished and exist in
DD> beta demo versions, but the process is ongoing :)

As I understand it, NAM is a new mailer, and it will support
a better decryption scheme for addresses #38BF-#3FBF using
IRQ4 modem for interrupts.
A Why is MK worse? Or will it be there too?

I would like to take this opportunity to find out whether the new mailer
will support automatic mail collection? I really need it.

All the best.
Sergey.

SI> And what are the advantages of a circuit with interruptions (if any)?
SI> On a 14400 modem and a 3.5 MHz processor, both circuits work the same.
SI> Maybe the potential capabilities are higher (in a turbo and on a faster
SI> modem)?
Until the software benefits are fully realized, they are of no use :( And so with
interrupts work more convenient and simpler and, as a result, greater speed,
for example, without a turbo, the same file was transferred by Momed on 14400 with Melon
and s-terminal (it is with nmi), and cps, respectively, ~800 and ~1100...

DD> I hope there will be both - at this stage it’s quite
DD> to implement their support.
Don’t hope, you have to do it ;)

DD> But personally, I don’t like interrupts in MK for several reasons: it
and
DD> dependence on ROM (at the same time increasing the length of the interrupt handler);
Hmm... What does ROM have to do with it? Or do you mean error 48 BASIC?

DD> well, to the heap - an extra microcircuit on the board :)
I thought so too, but I installed it and I liked it :)

SI>> Taking this opportunity, I want to find out whether the new mailer
SI>> will have support for automatically picking up mail? I really need it.
DD> Everyone needs it. This is where I’m going.
It’s not an easy path... After all, they gave birth to a wild one, though under a glitchy isdos :( By the way, according to
a wild one, no one has a normal help, where are all the buttons/features described?