ZED glitch
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
From Oleg Pritula → To All 15 October 1998
░░▒▒▓▓ How are you, Viktor! ▓▓▒▒░░
Comment msg Alexander Kormishin to Viktor Kuzmin
[...]
VK> Why those Zed? Use Lara Croft mail editor.
VK> By the way, I’m throwing version 1.80 into the echo.
VK> ps: soon there will be 2.00, where there will be uue.
I would like to know what are the advantages of Lara over Zed, before switching to it?
To be honest, the version is before 1.80 (I don’t remember exactly), Nenya was not convinced of the feasibility of the transition.
In particular, the lack of automatic creation of eh (manually setting them every time a new one appears, to put it mildly, is not very convenient).
Another big drawback, IMHO, is the _manual_ editing of package extensions on *.E
In general, this is not what I need anymore It was enough not to run this program anymore
for my own purposes.
Maybe this has already been eliminated in new versions and I’m just behind on life? ;)
├─┤asta la vista !!!
[SG] [Clawfinger] [Megadeth] [SSAU] [ZX] [Beer]
√ E-mail: w...@chat.ru
From Dmitriy Timokhin → To All 19 October 1998
Waiting, sir... ;) Will it fly to zxnet.soft?
OP> I would like to know what are the advantages of Lara over Zed, before
OP> moving on to it?
OP> Honestly, the version before 1.80 (I don’t remember exactly), Nenya not
OP> convinced me of
OP> the feasibility of the transition.
It was Lara Croft 1.50. Indeed - not very much.
OP> In particular, the lack of auto-creation eh (manually setting them
OP> every time
OP> a new one appears, to put it mildly, is not very convenient).
??? I have new echoes in L.C. 1.80 are themselves created during tossing.
OP> Another big drawback, IMHO, is the _manual_
OP> editing of package extensions
OP> to *.E
If you hold down some button, then packages with the
extension "C" will be tossed. For the life of me I don’t remember which button. ;)
OP> In general, this was already enough for me to not
OP> launch this program anymore
OP> for my own purposes.
OP> Maybe this has already been eliminated in new versions and I'm just
OP> behind on life? ;)
Lara 1.80 - steering wheel !
IMHO, Lara is better than zed - much faster, more bug-free, more convenient intermuzzle ;) ( -
who didn’t understand - interface :)))) .
Uue will be coming soon. And in general, it’s much more convenient that you create your own database of messages - you can rub any message, then compress the post file... I never dreamed of this with ZE.
And all the shortcomings you describe have long beeneliminated...
In general, L.C. I think they threw 1.80 here. If it doesn’t come through, I can throw it in with soap. ;)
Good bye ! ... Pintium is a hot kick ...
Here waz Dmitriy AKA Raven.
From Arseniy Astapenko → To All 20 October 1998
Heh, that's what they told you :) And who will test?
There are no advantages, only disadvantages are noticed by everyone.
OP> convenient). Another big drawback, IMHO, is
OP> _manual_ editing of package extensions on *.E In general, this was already enough for me
OP> to stop running this program for
OP> my purposes. Maybe in new versions this has already been eliminated and I
OP> am just behind the times about life? ;)
I'm a little behind. And about *.E, I already said here:
why does zxzip (zxz2$z) for pc make such extensions?
I was with you
Ars^FTL