[FWD] tricolor
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
From Kirill Frolov → To All 9 February 2000
07 Feb 00 10:41, Eugene Palenock wrote to All:
EP> What is the format of the subject pictures? Three _screens_ one after the other or all
EP> three _sprites_? I came across all sorts, but which one is more correct, and which one has more software? I'm leaning towards the first one.
ZF #6 describes it in detail. 3 screens (6144) in a row, packed with anything,
but at the very beginning there is an unpacker.
EP> A pack of subject pictures from the Zilog website is ready, all about the eZ80, I don’t know
EP> in what form to upload.
JPG if the pictures are like photos and BMP if black and white all sorts of graphics and
drawings.
... no day without speccy!
From Vyacheslav Kalinin → To All 9 February 2000
Somewhere 07-02-00 around 10:41:23
Eugene Palenock tapped on the keyboard to no one All,
about [FWD] tricolor ...
EP> * From: Valerij Kozhevnikoff, 500:95/468.2@ZXNet (06 Feb 00 18:12)
EP> What is the format of the subject pictures? Three _screens_ one after the other or is it
EP> three _sprites_?
EP> I came across all sorts, but which one is more correct, and which one has more software? I
EP> am inclined
EP> to the first one.
EP> A pack of subject pictures from Zilog’s website is ready, all about the eZ80, I don’t know in
EP> what
EP> form to upload.
I know for a moment that the storage format is used much more often when
three pictures go one after another in the usual Speck format.
That's it. Bye, Eugene
NewArt/N-DISCOVERY group
E-mail: Vyacheslav_K...@zxnet.spb.ru
From Kirill Frolov → To All 11 February 2000
09 Feb 00 07:54, Vyacheslav Kalinin wrote to Eugene Palenock:
VK> I know that the storage format is used much more often when
VK> three pictures go one after another in the usual Spekov format.
JPEG viewer is better. If only because it’s at least possible
to look at something like this on an offtopic site.