EMUL

Please advise a decent emulsion for Win 2000, suitable for
you can run ALASM and STS on it for writing and debugging system software
(that is, ultra-precise beam synchronization is not required).

2 KF: If it’s not difficult, forward it to ZX.SPECTRUM, otherwise I’m not up for it signed.

Sincerely, Dmitriy.

16 Dec 00 12:09, Dmitriy Nesmachny -> All:

DN> Please advise a decent emulsion for Win 2000, suitable so that
DN> you can run ALASM and STS on it for writing and debugging
DN> system software (that is, ultra-precise synchronization
DN> of the beam).

Firstly, this is off-topic, and secondly, there is no such thing. Under MD2000, even ordinary
console players stand up like crazy...

WBR, Jason.

[Team Obituary][Team Friday 13th][Team Evil Maniacs][Team Huge Axes]

Replying to a message of Dmitriy Nesmachny to All:

DN> Please advise a decent emul for Win 2000, suitable for
DN> you could run ALASM and STS on it for writing and debugging
DN> system software (that is, ultra-precise synchronization
DN> of the beam is not necessary).

Well, I’ve already gotten to emulators... And here it’s off-topic, I think so.

[ZX]

Replying to a message of Valerij Kozhevnikoff to Dmitriy Nesmachny:

DN>> Please advise a decent emul for Win 2000, suitable for that

VK> Firstly, this is off-topic, and secondly, there is no such thing. Under MD2000, even
VK> ordinary consoles stand up with cancer...

This is how Microsoft helps the real Spectrum in the fight against emulators :-)

[ZX]

DN> Hello, All!

DN> Please advise a decent emulsion for Win 2000, suitable
DN> so that on
DN> you can run ALASM and STS for writing and
DN> debugging system software
DN> (that is, ultra-precise synchronization is not required ray).

DN> 2 KF: If it’s not difficult, forward this to ZX.SPECTRUM, otherwise I
DN> don’t subscribe to it.
Isn’t Shalaevsky suitable?

▒▒▓▓▓ ▄▀█▀▀▀ ▓▓▓▒▒░░░ Sincerely yours, Yuri /I \
▒▓▓▓ ▐▌▀█▀ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒░░░░ Jerri / Alien Factory \ZX/

DN>> synchronization
DN>> beam).
KF>
KF> Well, I’ve already gotten to emulators... And here it’s
KF> offtopic, I think so.

Yes, not for myself, KVA said: if you find an emulsion, I’ll continue to refine Lara. ;-)

Sincerely, Dmitriy.

DN> Yes, not for myself, KVA said: if you find an emulsion, I will continue to refine
DN> Lara. ;-)

AAA... What, MOAshny is not coming? under ME ?

DN>> finalize
DN>> Lara. ;-)

KF> AAA... What, MOA doesn’t work? under ME?

Uh-uh... I don't quite know: he has ME or just 2000... But I'll forward the letter to him...

With respect, Dmitriy.

DN> Uh-uh... I don't quite know whether he has ME or just 2000... But the letter
DN> I'll forward him...

No, it won't do. How crooked everything is under this new Windows...
I have (look at the kludges) emuls.

Thursday 28 Dec 2000 08:10:44, Kirill Frolov -> Dmitriy Nesmachny:

KF> No, it won’t work. How crooked everything is under this new Windows
KF>...
KF> My emuls (see kludges) are running.

What would you like to watch (see tirline)?

With respect, Dmitriy.

DN> Uh-uh... I don't quite know whether he has ME or just 2000... But I'll send the letter to him
DN>...

Everything goes under ME. IMHO me - a little wretched - it's w98 only slightly modified, while w2000 is made on the basis of the NT system kernel, which is much better. But here we need
to write
not under DOS, but purely under Windows...
And assuming the presence of a sophisticated processor (I currently have a P-III 800)

See ya later, KVA of E-mage.
{ 2:450/124.51 / k...@cosmigo.com / ICQ #81345229 }

DN> What would you like to watch (see threadline)?

But you don’t need emulators and in general this is off-topic here. Didn't Lara
learn to show kludge
?