Wild
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 19 April 2000
Does anyone have a subject that supports Gluck's CMOS clock running in binary-decimal_ mode, and not just in binary?
PS: Does the subject really work in duplex or is it just me? :-)
For this Au Revoire, CompoWellcome. [Team GS]
From Sergey Selev → To All 20 April 2000
One day on Wednesday, April 19, 2000, Nicolas Davidov spoke with All about Wild...
ND> Does anyone have a thread that supports Gluck's CMOS clock
ND> running in _binary-decimal_ mode, and not just in
ND> binary?
Can I give a subroutine for reading the CMOS clock register, taking into account systems
presentation.
██████▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒░░░░::::: Sergey aka Cyber from Cobra Software.
███▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒░░░░::::
██▓▓▓▒▒▒░░░░::
... [ -= I ZX =- ] [ ZX-Spectrum rules & lives forever ]
From Sergey Orlov → To All 21 April 2000
Wednesday April 19 2000, 17:49,
Nicolas Davidov (2:5085/1.149) wrote to All
ND> Does anyone have a thread that supports Gluck's CMOS clock running in
ND> _binary-decimal_ mode, and not just in binary?
ND> PS: Does the subject really work in duplex or does it seem so to me? :-)
As far as I know, HYDRA is implemented there, which is a bi-directional protocol
(duplex in the sense)
WBR, Sergey! [I ZX] ZXNet -=> 500:152/4
FIDONet -=> 2:451/13.49 aka /16.71
np: silence (Winamp is not active ;-)
... mailto:doc...@mailru.com
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 22 April 2000
ND>> running in _binary-decimal_ mode, and not just in binary?
SS> I can give a subroutine for reading the CMOS clock register, taking into account the system
SS> representation.
I have this...
I just didn’t want to mess around, I thought there was a ready-made one...
From Roman Milukov → To All 22 April 2000
April 19, 2000, you wrote here:
ND> Does anyone have a thread that supports Gluck's CMOS clock running in
ND> _binary-decimal_ mode, and not just binary?
Well, I have...
Only I again have problems with communication. :(
All the best.
Roman.
[ZX]
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 25 April 2000
A long time ago Fri 21 Apr 2000, Sergey Orlov and Nicolas Davidov thought on the topic:
Wild
ND>> PS: Does the subject really work in duplex or is it just me? :-)
SO> As far as I know, HYDRA is implemented there, which is a bi-directional
SO> protocol (duplex in the sense)
I wonder if CPS drops with duplex or not...
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 25 April 2000
A long time ago Sat 22 Apr 2000, Roman Milukov and Nicolas Davidov were thinking on the topic:
Wild
ND>> Does anyone have a thread that supports Gluck's CMOS clock running in
From Denis Tsigancov → To All 26 April 2000
Could someone throw a subject at the echo (or soap at me)?
WBR, Den 'CDL'
From Sergey Orlov → To All 26 April 2000
WBR, Sergey! [I ZX] ZXNet -=> 500:152/4
FIDONet -=> 2:451/13.49 aka /16.71
np: silence (Winamp is not active ;-)
... mailto:doc...@mailru.com
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 27 April 2000
Once upon a time Wed 26 April 2000, Denis Tsigancov and All were thinking on the topic: Wild
DT> Could someone throw the subject at the echo (or at me with soap)?
Imho, it’s better in the echo. Moreover, the option supports Gluck's CMOS clock running in
BCD format...
From Denis Tsigancov → To All 27 April 2000
DT>> soap) ?
ND> IMHO, it’s better in the echo. Moreover, the option supports Gluck's
ND> CMOS clock running in BCD format...
I no longer need it (Musa promised to upload it)...
WBR, Den 'CDL'
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 28 April 2000
SO> IMHO, no. Experience shows that a non-duplex ZModem is worse than a duplex Hydry.
It looks like it was deliberately looked at in the wild, at a speed of 16800 CPS=1800
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 28 April 2000
Once upon a time Thu Apr 27, 2000, Denis Tsigancov and Nicolas Davidov were thinking on
the topic: Wild
DT>>> Could someone throw the subject at the echo (or at me with soap)?
ND>> IMHO, it’s better in the echo. Moreover, the option supports Gluck’s CMOS clock
ND>> running in BCD format...
DT> I don’t need it anymore (Musa promised to upload it)...
He has a subject clock with BIN, and not in BCD mode it supports... suks...
From Sergey Selev → To All 29 April 2000
ND> He has a subject clock with BIN, and not in BCD mode it supports...
ND> suks...
And actually what is the problem with converting BIN - BCD and back?
███▓▓▓▒▒▒░░░ Sergey aka Cyber from Cobra Software.
██▓▓▓▒▒▒░░░
█▓▓▓▒▒▒░░░ 500:322/67.16 500:322/72.10
... [I ZX] [Beer] [Storm] [Turbo Commander] [ZXNet] [FidoNet]
From Roman Milukov → To All 29 April 2000
SO> Hydry.
In general - yes.
And one more thing. According to my observations, with a crappy connection, Z-modem wins in transmission speed, Hydra works much better for reception. With a VERY shitty connection
Z-modem simply dies - there is no exchange at all, and Hydra is slowly pulling the file!
All the best.
Roman.
[ZX]
From Roman Milukov → To All 29 April 2000
Okay, one of these days I'll throw dosx under the Glitch-clock. And the rest, someone throw DT
_soap_.
All the best.
Roman.
[ZX]
From Nicolas Davidov → To All 30 April 2000
ND>> He has a subject clock with BIN, and not in BCD mode it supports... suks...
SS> And actually, what is the problem with converting BIN - BCD and back?
There is no problem _translating_, but transferring every time you call wild...
gets...
From Roman Milukov → To All 2 May 2000
On April 29, 2000, I wrote here:
RM> Okay, one of these days I’ll throw dosx under the Glitch-clock. And throw the rest
No, I won’t throw anything, it was all killed by accident. :(((
Ask Oleg Grigoriev, maybe he still has it, it was he who made them...
All the best.
Roman.
[ZX]