CONCORD FAQServer
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
Dedicated to everyone who wrote letters to the fax server addressed to CONCORD
at my request.
This is what came from my node:
=========
I received, as you promised, requests for a shortened name, and one with a
delivery notification. They have been processed and sent. Try to teach correspondents not to write anything in the SABZH field, but to write the request in the body of the letter.
This, as stated in the help, gives a greater probability of delivery of the letter, since in
the SABZH field some nodes, instead of what was there, write “SPAM DETECTED”, and
letters with an empty body are killed.
=========
Draw your conclusions, gentlemen. If anyone has not received a response, please repeat the request, taking into account
the above information. It is very advisable to write to me about the results,
especially if there was no answer to your requests before.
Sincerely, Alexey!
Hello, Aleksey!
03 May 04 20:53, Aleksey Tarasow -> ALL:
AT> I received, as you promised, requests for a shortened name, and
AT> one with a delivery notification. They have been processed and sent. Try
AT> to teach your correspondents not to write anything in the SUBJECT field, but to write the request in
AT> the body of the letter. This, as stated in the help, gives a greater probability
AT> of delivering the letter, since in the SABZH field some nodes, instead of what was there
AT>, write “SPAM DETECTED”, and letters with an empty body are killed.
AT> =========
AT> Draw your own conclusions, gentlemen.
It no longer works. I received 2 files after this announcement, and that’s all.
Then I repeated it several times - silence.
AT> * Origin: “Strength is the last argument of stupid people” (c) Isaac Asimov.
That's it. This is not the way to solve this problem.
Let the robot write on behalf of the sysop. Let the robot write with ARq and sysop
figure out where the messages are cut.
zy. in general, I can almost say exactly who cuts - 2:5053/24 or 2:5053/16.
With respect, Evgeniy.
AT>> Try to teach your correspondents not to write anything in the SUBJECT field, but
AT>> to write the request in the body of the letter. This, as stated in the help, gives
AT>> a greater probability of delivery of the letter, since in the SABZH field some
AT>> nodes, instead of what was there, write “SPAM DETECTED”, and letters with
AT>> an empty body are killed. =========
AT>> Draw your conclusions, gentlemen.
EP> Doesn't work anymore. I received 2 files after this announcement, and that’s it.
EP> Then I repeated it several times - silence.
requests have been processed for you:
May 16 spec0223, spec0224, spec0225
May 18 spec0225
EP> Exactly. This is not the way to solve this problem.
EP> Let the robot write on behalf of the sysop. Let the robot write with ARq and sysop
EP> figure out where the messages are cut.
EP> pls. in general, I can almost say exactly who is cutting - 2:5053/24 or
EP> 2:5053/16.
two letters were sent to you three days ago in netmail confirming
the passage. They left the city, and then there was silence.
Sincerely, Alexey!