GLUE-FREE GLITCH SCHEME

It was 10 Jan 99 and 22:09:00, Renat Mamedov wrote to Kirill Frolov
on the topic GLUE-FREE GLITCH SCHEME
Not seeing a moderator nearby, I decided to insert a word:

RM> Personally, I can promise - everything that I write on the clock
RM> in the future will not work for you! :)

That's absolutely right - I don't have a sprinter. :-(

RM> due to its (hardware) complication. I still don’t understand
RM> why it is impossible to synchronize clock polling with interrupts...

And who said that the user will not press the magic button aka Magic ?

With best wishes, Kirill Frolov.

RM>>> according to this copy. Naturally, all manipulations
RM>>> with #EFF7 should be reflected on this copy... But this seems to be

KF>> At least someone writes it there?

RM> They didn’t do it in vain. In the dock to Gluck's scheme - this is clearly recommended.
RM> 'You need to learn materials', 'Theory without practice is dead'. (c)

It happens - you need 512x192. There is #eff7. The clock is not a glitch, but SMUC.
On this same #eff7 hangs _PALETTE_ for 512x192! There's nothing on the screen
probably not visible when recording 0.

KF>> Do you know such options when #eff7 is there, but there is no clock?
KF>> And on this port they hang from the palette to the
KF>> memory control bits.

RM> Daragoy Comrade! (c) Sukhov. - There are no such computers. And in general, everything
RM> in this world is the smoke of my dreams :))))....

There is no Pentogon with a glitch circuit either. There is PROFI/SCORP/KAY.

RM> I suggested this very #EFF7 for locking memory in that immemorial
RM> year - and I have never heard of anyone (except me)
RM> using this thing...

It locks for me. It is used in MADROM - I have it flashed.

KF>> requires
KF>> installation of 512vi1 (you also need to look for it), quartz at
KF>> 32768 Hz
KF>> worth $1 (!) and a bunch of transistors, resistors,
KF>> capacitors etc.
KF>> With Dallas there is a glitch circuit doesn't work. DALLAS IS WORTH IT$1.

RM> В1 - they gave it to me. Here I can’t find Dallas (oh trembling! :)) for the
RM> sprinter until now...

And I couldn’t find 512vi1!

RM> Quartz of the indicated frequency is available in any (almost) wrist
RM> (and not only) watches...

I don’t have extra watches to pick them out. And Cathay
quartz is complete crap. It is necessary to use normal ones.

RM> for this purpose a small amount of software. True, the situation with the
RM> software has still remained the same... This is where you need to transform your raging
RM> energy :).

I need a watch: in MMD-4.00 and Lara. You can also go to DME. They are not needed anywhere else
or just to have time on the screen. They also need Dickie.

RM> Then I absolutely don’t understand you - if Gluck’s
RM> scheme is so bad - why did you repeat it? They would have composed their own -
RM> and why bother swearing like scribal carpenters?

Just so that MADROM would tick and HOMER would say that he had found a watch.
Well, before I had the ZXNEWS scheme. Everything is fine, but climbing
for time in TR-DOS is a vile perversion.

One day on the 13th of Jan 99 at exactly 04:24:50 Kirill Frolov
wrote to Renat Mamedov on the topic 'GLUTCH-FREE GLITCH SCHEME':

KF> I need a watch: in MMD-4.00 and Lara. You can also go to DME. They are not needed anywhere else
KF> or just so that there is time on the
KF> screen. They also need Dickie.

Did you get it working with your mom?

With best wishes, Dmitry.

RM>> hours...

KF> And who said that the user will not press the magic button aka
KF> Magic?

I completely don’t understand what the magic has to do with it, if we were talking about
working with the clock using IM 2???

This is the version of the investigation. I said.

KF> Just -- so that MADROM ticks and HOMER says that he
KF> found the clock.

Oh!!! Let me remember your words about Homer:
'and in general I have already applied the format to this disk'...
And if you follow the established standards, as you yourself
admitted - THEN WHY THE HELL ARE YOU TRYING TO CHANGE THEM, AND ALSO
SO !!!

KF> Well, before I had the ZXNEWS scheme. Everything is fine, but
KF> climbing
KF> for time in TR-DOS is a vile perversion.

I would be happy to continue the topic of vile perversions
(in hardware, what did you think?) - but I feel sorry for the subscribers... :)

KF>> it was. They also need it in Dickie.

DS> did it work with your momed?

WILD DOESN'T WORK WITH THESE ONE!

Well, you’re in vain. I have had the latch since I installed the watch.

With the best, Renat!

... I’ll buy a moonshine still. intermediary phone number 02.

DD> Well, you are in vain. I've had the latch forever since
DD> installed the watch.

Why do you need it? The only use is when I'm in a glitch
forced for some rotten programs that stubbornly don't
want to work on 256/512 to lock the memory... And yet, the
resident boot can for its own purposes (so that it doesn't
be killed) close the upper memory - quite convenient, but
no one except me has this boot :(
So I ask you to use the memory latch consider
inexpedient and unnecessary in terms of iron...

RM> Why do you need it? The only use is when I'm in a glitch
RM> forced to lock the memory for some rotten prog that stubbornly
RM> doesn't want to work on 256/512...

That's exactly what it's worth. I won’t say that I actively use it, but
sometimes I have to, and it’s very useful.

RM> So, I ask you to consider
RM> the use of a memory latch as inappropriate and unnecessary in terms of hardware...

In terms of hardware, I already had an extra trigger on the board, all that remained was to
stretch a few wires... IMHO, for a high-quality boot it is a matter of honor
to support this latch in order to be able launch even higher-quality
programs
with tricky page switchers. Like in Honey Commander (there for some reason
it’s not a superfluous option at all, although it’s useless for me).

DD> In terms of hardware, I already had an extra trigger on the board,
DD> all that was left was
DD> to stretch a few wires... IMHO, for quality

In terms of hardware, initially I suggested installing TM8 - everything is
enough...

DD> buta is a matter of honor
DD> to support this latch in order to be able to launch even more
DD> "high-quality"
DD> programs
DD> with clever page switchers. Like in Honey Commander-e
DD> (there for some reason
DD> it’s not a superfluous option at all, although for me it’s useless).

In this regard, the only “quality boot” is the one I
wrote :) More booties - good and different! :)

Because on a sprinter it is definitely superfluous.

There are programs that simply will not work without this latch.
There are _very_ many_ of them. Pentagon - masday, Scorpio - rulez.