Alasm v3.8c
ZXNet echo conference «real.speccy»
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 15 January 1999
Wow, I just discovered an interesting glitch in the subject. If you take and assemble the
following text, it will not be assembled correctly.
org 32765
ld de,(metka) or ld (metka),de
metka
In the codes it looks like this: ld de,(1), and such a glitch is observed with all
registers except hl. Damn, I almost died before I realized what had happened, the program flatly refused to work correctly. These are the Asms we choose. ;)
Sincerely, SP/PoS.
From Oleg Pritula → To All 16 January 1999
It happened on 15 Jan 99 at 23:21:22, when
Konstantin Samoylov nevertheless risked writing All
about Alasm v3.8c
KS> Wow, I just discovered an interesting glitch in the subject. If you take and
KS> assemble
KS> the following text, then it will not be assembled correctly.
KS> org 32765
KS> ld de,(metka) or ld (metka),de
KS> metka
KS> In the codes it looks like this: ld de,(1), and such a glitch
KS> is observed with all
KS> registers except hl. Damn, I almost died before I realized that
Hmmm... really... :-()
Only in Alasm v4.1 the ld (metka),de operation is assembled normally, but with
ld de,(metka) there are really bugs...
and in the codes it is: ld de,(#0002)
A very unpleasant glitch... :-/
\\|// ╟─┤asta la vista !!!
o(@ @)o -=POWer/WDG=-
-----ooO-(_)-Ooo-----
From Alex Noman → To All 17 January 1999
Saturday January 16 1999 20:27, Oleg Pritula wrote by Konstantin Samoylov:
OP> A very unpleasant glitch... :-/
And I warned you. ;) All on Xas. ;)
OP> \\|// ╟─┤asta la vista !!!
With respect, Alex Noman.
From Oleg Pritula → To All 18 January 1999
It happened on 17 Jan 99 at 19:12:49, when
Alex Noman nevertheless risked writing to Oleg Pritula
about Alasm v3.8c
From Alex Noman → To All 19 January 1999
OP> Some habits acquired over time are very difficult to
OP> revision... ;(
Here it is stuck. :() I would say in Russian: “It breaks...” :))
OP> o(@ @)o -=POWer/WDG=-
With respect, Alex Noman.
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 19 January 1999
17 Jan 99 19:12, Alex Noman -> Oleg Pritula:
OP>> A very unpleasant glitch... :-/
AN> And I warned you. ;) All on Xas. ;)
It is not suitable for everyone and not for everyone... Does it even support memory more than 128k
?
With respect, SP/PoS.
From Alex Baskakov → To All 20 January 1999
KS> Wow, I just discovered an interesting glitch in the subject. If you take and
KS> assemble
KS> the following text, then it will not be assembled correctly.
KS> org 32765
KS> ld de,(metka) or ld (metka),de
KS> metka
KS> In the codes it looks like this: ld de,(1), and such a glitch
KS> is observed with all
KS> registers except hl. I damn near died before I realized that
From Dmitry Lomov → To All 20 January 1999
AN> And I warned you. ;) All on Xas. ;)
and I warn you ;-) everyone is on STORM :)
All the best.
Dmitry.
..LD..X-TRADE..
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 21 January 1999
OP>> Only in Alasm v4.1 the operation ld (metka),de is assembled
OP>> normally, but with ld de,(metka) there are really bugs... and in
OP>> the codes are: ld de,(#0002) A very unpleasant glitch... :-/
AB> Yes Well... You really made me happy. Only as much as I wrote in it,
AB> everything was fine. Apparently this glitch appears only in
AB> certain conditions.
Hy, as soon as the command hits the address 32765, that’s when it appears. ;)
Sincerely, SP/PoS.
From Oleg Pritula → To All 21 January 1999
AB> Yeah... You really made me happy. But as long as I wrote in
AB> it,
AB> everything was fine. Apparently this glitch appears
AB> only under certain
AB> conditions.
It seems to only appear with org 32765.
With other address values, I did not find this glitch...
From Andrew Lee → To All 21 January 1999
DL> and I warn you ;-) everyone is on STORM :)
yeah. is there a storm going on? I want the tags to be long (min. 20
characters)...
With best wishes,Andrew Wizard.
...sanctum regnum...
From Alex Noman → To All 22 January 1999
Persuaded. ;) Last thought. But just so that the scorpion supports the texts, as there were
pages... ;)
DL> All the best.
DL> Dmitry.
With respect, Alex Noman.
From Alex Noman → To All 22 January 1999
How are you, Konstantin?
Tuesday January 19, 1999 10:07, Konstantin Samoylov wrote to Alex Noman:
OP>>> A very unpleasant glitch... :-/
AN>> And I warned you. ;) All on Xas. ;)
KS> It is not suitable for everyone and not for everyone... But it actually supports more memory
KS> 128k?
The author supports it in a very original way: it clicks the FD port with 6
bits installed. The number of texts is limited to three. Two can be assembled. ;)
KS> Best regards
KS> SP/PoS.
Regards, Alex Noman.
From Andrey Isaev → To All 22 January 1999
ëءث-شد 20 Jan 99 × 03:20:00 ذزدةعدغإج ثدخئجةثش
Dmitry Lomov ة Alex Noman سذدزةجة خء شإحص Alasm v3.8c
ٌ زإغةج ذزدؤدجضةشط ـشدش سذدز:
OP>>> ïقإخط خإذزةرشخظت اجہث... :-/
AN>> ل ر ذزإؤصذزإضؤءج. ;) ÷سإ خء ëسءس. ;)
DL> ء ر ذزإؤصذزإضؤءہ ;-) ×سإ خء STORM :)
÷دش ثداؤء ـشدش سءحظت غشدزح خءصقةشسر س زءسغةزإخدت ذءحرشطہ زءآدشءشط ر ذإز×ظت
سجإعص س ثسءسء ة صتؤص شصؤء :)
---€€€ ² َ ص×ءضإخةإح, لخؤزإت ¯ €€€€--
From Alex Baskakov → To All 22 January 1999
KS> Hy, as soon as the command hits the address 32765, that’s when it appears. ;)
No, seriously?
Fuck you, Konstantin... That's it... Bye!
Alexey||Rain
From Alexander Kormishin → To All 22 January 1999
Exactly. On to STORM! :)
When will there be a new version?
Goodbye, Dmitry.
[ Team ZX-HSC'84 ]
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 26 January 1999
AB>> only in certain
AB>> conditions.
OP> It seems that it appears only with org 32765.
OP> With other address values, I did not find this glitch...
You are wrong, it appears when such things get to address 32765 team.
Sincerely, SP/PoS.
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 27 January 1999
KS>> supports more than 128k?
AN> The author's support is very original: clicks the FD port with
AN> set to 6 bits. The number of texts is limited to three.
AN> Two can be assembled. ;)
No, that won’t work, I’m already using 6 pages. ;)
Sincerely, SP/PoS.
From Alex Noman → To All 28 January 1999
KS> No, that won’t work, I already use 6 pages. ;).
From Oleg Pritula → To All 29 January 1999
OP>> discovered...
KS> You are wrong, it appears when such commands are sent to the address 32765
KS>.
Can you then explain to me the difference in what I said and what you said? ;)
From Dmitry Lomov → To All 29 January 1999
AI> When this very storm learns to work with extended memory, I will be the first
AI> to get off the XAS and go there :)
heh, what, XAS already knows how to work with extended memory?
All the best.
Dmitry.
..LD..X-TRADE..
From Alex Noman → To All 30 January 1999
I wonder what is special about this address?
7FFD LD DE,(XXYY) ;ED
7FFE ;5B
7FFF ;YY
8000 ;XX
If he (Alem) clicked the page incorrectly, this would be reflected in all
commands and addresses. Maybe this is a one-pass feature? ;))
OP> Maybe then you can explain to me the difference in what I said and what you said? ;)
You speak in general, but he talks about specific teams. ;)
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 30 January 1999
OP>>> It seems that it only appears at org 32765.
OP>>> With other address values, I didn’t find this glitch
OP>>>...
KS>> You’re wrong, it appears when the following get to the address 32765
KS>> teams.
From Dmitry Lomov → To All 30 January 1999
AK> Exactly. On to STORM! :)
AK> When will there be a new version?
there will be, there will be :)
but there is no rush in this matter and there will not be; accordingly, there will be no
definite deadlines.
offer all sorts of features ;-)
I’m sure that 90% of what you propose has already been included in the
plan :)
All the best.
Dmitry.
..LD..X-TRADE..
From Alex Noman → To All 31 January 1999
AI>> I'll be the first to get off the XAS and go there :)
DL> heh, what, XAS already knows how to work with extended memory?
This will be a reason. ;) In the meantime, the capabilities of ASMS do not vary very much. There are more texts in ksas, perhaps. ;)
From Andrey Isaev → To All 31 January 1999
ëءث-شد 29 Jan 99 × 00:22:00 ذزدةعدغإج ثدخئجةثش
Dmitry Lomov ة Andrey Isaev سذدزةجة خء شإحص Alasm v3.8c
ٌ زإغةج ذزدؤدجضةشط ـشدش سذدز:
DL>>> ء ر ذزإؤصذزإضؤءہ ;-) ×سإ خء STORM :)
AI>> ÷دش ثداؤء ـشدش سءحظت غشدزح خءصقةشسر س زءسغةزإخدت ذءحرشطہ زءآدشءشط ر
ذإز×ظت
AI>> سجإعص س ثسءسء ة صتؤص شصؤء :)
DL> بإ, ء قشد, ثسءس صضإ صحإإش س زءسغةزإخخدت ذءحرشطہ زءآدشءشط?
Hإش ثدخإقخد :( ×دش شدجطثد ذءحرشة س×دآدؤخدت ص خإاد آصؤإش ذدآدجإ قإح ص غشدزحء.
From Alexander Kormishin → To All 9 February 1999
DL> there will be, there will be :)
DL> but there is no rush in this matter and there will not be; accordingly,
DL> there will be no
DL> and there will be no specific deadlines.
DL> suggest all sorts of features ;-)
please, feature at least somewhere :)
we need to make it so that we can remove this frame around
the text. Otherwise it’s constraining.
DL> I’m sure that 90% of what you propose has long been
DL> inserted into
DL> the plan :)
yes, even these 90% will be above the roof, just do it as soon as possible.
Goodbye, Dmitry.
From Alex Baskakov → To All 10 February 1999
AK> Yes, even these 90% will be through the roof, just do it as soon as possible.
By the way, no one knows why Alasm 4.2 produces errors on the lines
where the swear words are contained. expressions with brackets?
For example:
LD BC,#c000+(32*sprh)+(15*smesch)
It’s impossible to study! What's the trick?
Fuck you, Alexander... That's it... Bye!
Alexey||Rain
From Eudgine Palenock → To All 12 February 1999
Once, 10 Feb 99 at 17:55:00, someone Alex Baskakov wrote to Alexander Kormishin,
on the topic 'Re: Alasm v3.8c'...
AB> By the way, no one knows why Alasm 4.2 produces errors on the lines
AB> where the swear words are contained. expressions with brackets?
AB> For example:
AB> LD BC,#c000+(32*sprh)+(15*smesch)
AB> It’s impossible to study! What's the trick?
And you write like this:
temp1=32*sprh
temp2=15*smesch+temp1+#C000
LD BC,temp2
By the way, here, as you can see, EQU is not needed, you can just write "="...
And if there are parentheses, he thinks that you are reading from memory...
Sincerely, Evgeniy aka EVP.
From Alex Baskakov → To All 12 February 1999
EP> And you write like this:
EP> temp1=32*sprh
EP> temp2=15*smesch+temp1+#C000
EP> LD BC,temp2
EP> By the way, here, as you can see, EQU is not needed, you can just write "="...
EP> And if there are parentheses, he thinks that you are reading from memory...
I What, do you look like an idiot? Yes, in my tasma the lines for calculating the placement
sweep take 64 characters! And there are many of them. What insanity.
Fuck you, Eudgine... That's it... Bye!
Alexey||Rain