512x384x2

People, tell me, is there a pattern for hemp in nature? If so, then
where can I get it? I don’t care that there is no software, the main thing is that there is such a resolution...

That’s all for me. Bye, Everybody!

Sincerely, Roman (aka
TimeX).

RT> People, tell me, is there a sabzhe pattern for hemp in nature? If so,
RT> where can I get it? It doesn’t matter that there is no software, the main thing is that the resolution is the same...
the simplest thing is 2 screens 512*192 switch 50hz
but you can try to do something like interlace:
I won’t say for sure, but in my opinion there shouldn’t be an integer number of lines in the frame, like
in TV - 312.5, I wanted to try it myself, but forgot something...
If it works, write it down.

I was with you .┌─┐┌─┐┬┌ .┌─┐ aka J7n/4D
│┼─┼│ ├┴┐│├┤
jtn_dog_mail.ru
└┘┘ └└─┘┴ ┴└└─┘
sp...@fbi.com

VK> the simplest 2 screens 512*192 switch 50hz

we tried this - it looks pretty buggy. By the way, in the appendix to depth #2 (?)
there is a demo of a viewer that works the same way.

VK> but you can try to do something like interlace:
VK> I won’t say for sure, but in my opinion there should not be an integer number of lines in the frame, like
VK> in TV - 312.5, I wanted to try it myself, but I forgot something...

it needs to be clear 512x384... in 320 lines):

That's all for me. Bye, Vassili!

RT> no, it needs to be clearly 512x384... in 320 lines):
what is it like 384->320?;)
I think this is how it should be: the spec uses only odd (or even?)
lines on the monitor, which is visible to the naked eye. And TV uses both.
In theory, a delay is needed between frames so that the beam moves by 1 line and
the result is alternation through the frame: 1st - even, 2nd odd, etc. Well,
switching screens can be done in hardware (it seems there is even some kind of bit on
#eff7 for this purpose...)

On Thursday, July 12, 2001, Vassili Klimov and Roman Timofeev discussed
"512x384x2". Let's continue the conversation...

RT>> it needs to be clearly 512x384... in 320 lines):
VK> I think this is how it should be: the spec uses only odd (or even?)
VK> lines on the monitor, which is visible to the naked eye. And TV uses both those and
VK> others. In theory, a delay is needed between frames so that the beam moves by 1
VK> line and the result is alternation through the frame: 1st - even, 2nd odd, and
VK> etc. Well, switching screens can be done in hardware (it seems there is even a bit
VK> on #eff7 for this purpose...)

Hmm... let's think about it;) Thanx!