"TR-DOS file extensions"
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.soft»
From Ivan Roshin → To All 5 December 2004
Hello, All!
Once again the article "Extensions" has been supplemented and corrected
TR-DOS files". Does anyone need it?
Best regards, Ivan Roshchin.
From Alexander Bondarenko → To Ivan Roshin 7 December 2004
*Hello, Ivan!*
Catch my ideas about the subject "TR-DOS file extensions" about which
your footcloth to comrade cracked on 05 Dec 2004. All.
IR> Once again the article "Extensions has been supplemented and corrected
IR> TR-DOS files". Does anyone need it?
Go ahead. :)
/That’s all, Ivan, you can scroll further.../
From Vladimir Larkov → To Ivan Roshin 7 December 2004
Hello, Ivan!
Sun 05-Dec-2004 16:37, you (500:95/462.53) wrote a letter to All:
IR> Once again the article "Extensions has been supplemented and corrected
IR> TR-DOS files". Does anyone need it?
Of course it is necessary. It is clear that the new and corrected version is better than the old one. Not even
ask next. once, just throw it in zkhnet.uue.
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From Ivan Roshin → To Vladimir Larkov 9 December 2004
Hello, Vladimir!
7 Dec 2004 you wrote:
IR>> Once again the article has been supplemented and corrected
IR>> "Extensions
IR>> TR-DOS files". Does anyone need it?
VL> Of course it is necessary. The stump is clear, what has been supplemented and corrected
VL> is better than the old one. Don't even ask again. once, just throw it
VL> in zkhnet.uue.
OK, I posted the article on ZXNET.UUE.
Best regards, Ivan Roshchin.