overl

Hello Aleksey. Tue 24 Sep 02 Aleksey Senilov -> Evgeny Goljakov: AS>>> A bunch of overlays does not mean a bunch of files, they can be accepted Combine AS>>> into a monoblock. (although this suggests itself AS>>> the solution is open source, and assembled from the necessary parts directly in EG>> A similar common sense idea was proposed for both RC and BV EG>> - in vain. AS> Vain in the sense that no one opens the sources? RC offered greater freedom to overlays. (c) D. Nesmachny In BV, modularity has been proposed for a long time, but the main argument is: it will be a bunch of files and it will be lazy to write a utility for collecting monoblock. (ts) people There's more of a psychological barrier here. Thank you for your attention.

||*()*|| Hello, _/Evgeny/_! September 25, 2002 01:34, Evgeny Goljakov wrote to Aleksey Senilov: AS>> Vain in the sense that no one opens the sources? EG> RC offered greater freedom to overlays. (c) D. Nesmachny Well yes... EG> BV proposed modularity for a long time, but the main argument: EG> this will be a bunch of files and it would be lazy to write a collection utility EG> monoblock. (ts) people "lazy" is the key word :) EG> There is rather a psychological barrier here. Psychological for the same discovery of source codes? EG> Thank you for your attention. You're welcome :) All the best! /*Boh*/ / /Image Crew/ was with you. ||*()*||