OS project
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.soft»
Hello, All
ATTENTION!
Please read the message below:
A new “closed” forum thread dedicated to the development of the system has been opened. Rules
the branches have not yet been formulated, just as the team that
participates in this project. Anyone wishing to participate, please unsubscribe.
PM Stanislav Yudin (CityAceE).
Hello,GriV
Gri> Anyone wishing to participate, please unsubscribe to Stanislav Yudin
Gri> (CityAceE) in a personal message.
Or GriV!
Hello ws_mason
There will most likely be pieces of code running through there, so it's more likely no than yes - but
question for the coordinator)
Announcements can be made, for example, in this thread.
Hello, CityAceE
Is it possible to make this section readable for those who are not involved in development?
I just want to be in the know.
Hello Alex/AT
but I think that we need to make riodonli, let the pieces of code run around - it’s more useful
people will slowly learn the system and begin trying to write an application.
And so it will turn out as always - the axis was made, the information was posted (thick in 100 sheets)
and are offended that no one supports their system
Hello,geners
I am, as it were, a passive forum participant.
But it would be interesting for me to read.
I'm for "ridonli"
Hello fk0
I am against ridonli, since a couple of threads will immediately appear in the main forum and
the flame will start.
let them get to some kind of intermediate result and post it on
public testing.
PS, although it’s very interesting what’s going on there: v2_frown:
Hello ws_mason
If anyone wanted to, they would go to sourceforge and it would be open and closed and
as needed more.
And so these are all games in the CPSU Central Committee.
Hello, do_se
and in my opinion the flaming will begin about
do_> PS, although it’s very interesting what’s going on there
*Hello, Dobrynin!*
Catch my ideas about the subject “OS Project”, which I talked about on March 29
2006 your footcloth to comrade. All.
DS> I am against readonley, since a couple of branches will appear immediately
DS> forum
DS> and the flame will begin. let it be better to reach some intermediate thread
DS> results and will be made publicly available for testing.
DS> PS, although it’s very interesting what’s going on there: v2_frown:
Yes, they are probably drinking there quietly.
/That’s all, Dobrynin, you can scroll further.../
Hello, All
Yes, let it be flimsy, but we will be in the know. I don't claim influence. But, damn it,
I wonder what they are preparing for us there.
Hello, captain cobalt
Well, since we will remove the code from the branch soon anyway (most likely), it will be possible
conceptually make an R/O branch for those interested. Although this is up to the branch admins to decide :)
Hello,GriV
Gri> The rules of the branch have not yet been formulated
Any idea when anything will be formulated?
Hello Alex/AT
I don’t see any point in closing the OS code for Speck.
Firstly, it is hardly commercially applicable.
And so - even people not related to the development of this OS can push
sound ideas.
Well, and especially for developers - read-online topics...
So open up, don't be bourgeois. :)
Hello, SfS
In general, I will answer all questions at once (I will take such responsibility upon myself).
1) Openness of the branch. The issue has been resolved, the thread will be closed as it is "squeezed out"
The project will be published periodically, how often has not been decided. In addition,
no one is stopping you from doing developments in the same forum thread. There are quite
real progress, which in general was not in this open thread.
2) We don’t really need a flame, see point 1), as practice shows, it obliges us
on the one hand to answer, on the other hand it does not allow you to work.
3) We don’t drink in a closed branch.
4) We do not play in the Central Committee of the CPSU.
5) Do not confuse the closedness of the branch and the closedness of the development process with projects
with closed code. The code is open, anyone can take it and use it.
in our fairly democratic conditions. But those who wish to take part in
development in general are invited.
6) The general principles of OS development are known - openness, universality,
productivity.
7) The rules have been formed, and work, one way or another, goes according to the rules.
Hello,GriV
By the way, I would like to see something like an interview in the press regarding the new OS -
This is a thought for press writers about where to get materials from :)