ALASM 4.3 (Criticism)

Hello Maxim. 16 Jan 2001 22:24, you wrote to me: AB>> If the author of this version can hear me, then I have questions: AB>> 1. Was it difficult to fix more glitches? AB>> 2. Was it difficult to bring the editor into at least a semi-normal form? MS> It is necessary to do more for page labels, but the rest will scan. There they are going to allocate 64 kilos for the marks. AB>> ps. Here, someone has disassembled 4.2 and is digging into it AB>> thoroughly now. What this will lead to will be shown nearby AB>> future. MS> Why all these perversions? I have the source code for Kva upgrade alasm 4.1 to MS> 4.2. It’s too late to rush around!.. :) They have already completely disassembled it, and have already dug into it specifically. 4.4 will be released soon... Wait for further developments... ;) Alexander

Hi, Dmitriy! Somehow on Tuesday January 16 2001, 11:07, Dmitriy Nesmachny (500:95/462.9) flamed about the subject with all DN> Well, I’ll add: it was difficult to at least write in which DN> order should the files be on the disk? And unite DN> then into a candy bar? And for some reason I didn’t get STS from DN> of the kit. Who did you go to, tell me what the rake is? Team DN> info says that the debugger is in the seventh bank, but when I try to go there DN> fall out - stuck. Car: Pentagon 128. Who knows what DN> troubles? Yes, there sts`ka is broken! :( I took it from the old ALASM and everything is O.K! The order of files for normal launch and definition should be like this: ALASM4.3 B alasm4.3 C sts6.2 C conf4.3 C Otherwise there will be glitches!!! :( That's all Dmitriy... BYE!!! [C-NET/ZXNet: 500:152/5.27]