Take 2: emulsion for Linux

ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.pc»

From Slavik Tretiak To All 26 December 2005

Hello, All So, despite the fact that such a topic already exists, I created a new one, because 1) there was something off-topic there 2) and something new could appear. Actually, what is (and is there) a spec emulsion for Linux that Pentagon can do? 512 + TRDOS + AY do not offer: 1) use Windows 2) wine + XXXYYY here. Is there anything that can help me or will I need to solder Monique to Kai?

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 26 December 2005

Hello Sinus Sin> So, despite the fact that such a topic already exists, I created a new one, so Sin> as Sin> 1) there was something not quite on topic Sin> 2) and something new could appear. Sin> Sin> Actually, what is (and is there) a spec emulsion for Linux that Sin> can Pentagon 512 + TRDOS + AY Sin> Sin> do not offer: Sin> 1) use Windows Sin> 2) wine + XXXYYY Sin> Sin> here. Sin> is there anything that can help me or will I need to solder the monique to Sin> kayu? Glyukalka can handle Pentagon 128K - if desired, you can correct the source to 512K also skillfully. Fuse does not know how to TR-DOS, but at one time I wrote a plug-in for him which, using standard TR-DOS entry points, read files from the current directory.

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 26 December 2005

Hello Shaos Sha> Fuse does not know how to TR-DOS, but at one time I wrote a plug-in for him Sha> which read files from the current one using standard TR-DOS entry points Sha> directory. Oops - apparently the last fuze can do tyrdos. The one I didn't know how to work with - this was 3-4 years ago.

From Stanislav Lomakin To All 27 December 2005

Hello Shaos yeah, now TRDOS can fuse, but it can do it crookedly... there is also XZX-pro, about which heard good things. but it's paid :(

From Slavik Tretiak To All 27 December 2005

Hello fk0 VMWare + Windows == point 1 (use Windows) wine[x] - commercial project (if nothing has changed) Yes, and raking with a rake is actually broken. It's easier to start one ;)

From Slavik Tretiak To All 27 December 2005

Hello fk0 VMWare + Windows == point 1 (use Windows) wine[x] - commercial project (if nothing has changed) Yes, and raking with a rake is actually broken. It's easier to start one ;)

From Nikolay Istomin To All 27 December 2005

Hello Sinus Sin> and raking is actually broken. It's easier to start a kai ;) Well, with something, but with Kai there will be no more problems than with this FUSE... Pentagon-128, yes. :rolleyes:

From Nikolay Istomin To All 27 December 2005

Hello Sinus By the way, only ZXMak is suitable for Cedega. Of course not the US, but it’s quite possible to live. FUSE and didn’t lie nearby.

From Chunin Roman To All 28 December 2005

Hello, Electrician > Well, with something, but with Kai there will be no more problems than this > FUSE... Pentagon-128, yes. :rolleyes: I strongly disagree ;).

From Slavik Tretiak To All 28 December 2005

Hello, sysop sys> new released - PyZX - 0.1 sys> .... sys> but since this is just code translated from java to Python, it’s not there sys> stated requirements I have concerns that this is a little off topic. because in the subject it was "Pentagon 512 + TRDOS + AY" and here clearly Pent512 does not smell. and it seems to me that there are holes too. especially since the emulator is in Python ;) yes... ;) An interesting language, of course, is Python. but absolutely not intended for writing things like emulators.

From Slavik Tretiak To All 28 December 2005

Hello, Electrician > Well, with something, but with Kai there will be no more problems than this > FUSE... Pentagon-128, yes. :rolleyes: I would venture to guess that you have never even seen Kai. I've had it for 5 years now ;) So presumably I have more reliable facts about glitches kaya - namely, after minor alterations, everything works awesome. I just don’t have time for nothing, but to connect Monique to Kai (normal, not a drop from the corvette) we need to “file it a little” again, and for this time is needed.

From Kirill Frolov To All 28 December 2005

Hello Sinus Sin> VMWare + Windows == item1 (use Windows) Sin> What are you saying? Are you a true Linuxist? > wine[x] - commercial project (if nothing has changed) > I don't know how commercial it is, but about 3 years ago I took the source code, compiled it, installed it and was happy. Money there was no need. > and raking is actually broken. It's easier to start a kai ;) Yes of course. It’s easier to install normal Windows, like everyone else does, and don't do shit.

From Slavik Tretiak To All 29 December 2005

Hello fk0 fk0> What are you saying. Are you a true Linuxist? no ;) I use Windows, DOS(!), various versions of Linux, Beesdu, Beosi, qnx-s, Amigaosi and so on (including our own production). I just got sick of Windows for the next half a year ;) > I don’t know how commercial it is, but 3 years ago I created the source > took it, assembled it, set it up and rejoiced. There was no need for money. this is more interesting ^_~ because the DX support that is available in wine simply doesn’t work well, to put it mildly. > Yes, of course. > It's easier to install normal Windows, like everyone else does, and not bother > fuck it. simpler, but not interesting. option with Kai in the guise of the option with a spherical Spectrum emulator under The good thing about Linux in a vacuum is that I can do my own projects. The option with Windows is also good, but... I don’t want it.

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello Sinus And this is Linux - there’s no escape. If you need something that most people don't need, then either write it yourself or change the platform. :(

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello fk0 fk0> It's easier to install normal Windows, like everyone else does fk0> and don’t engage in crap. Wow... I just left ENT, and here it’s the same... :rolleyes:

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello Sinus And this is Linux - there’s no escape. If you need something that most people don't need, then either write it yourself or change the platform. :(

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello fk0 fk0> It's easier to install normal Windows, like everyone else does fk0> and don’t engage in crap. Wow... I just left ENT, and here it’s the same... :rolleyes:

From Chunin Roman To All 11 January 2006

Hello, do_se Really, are you too lazy to install a firewall? I used for example TF, Atguard, BlackCat and now in the Maryinskaya network there is a special firewall - also convenient (and mandatory for installation). Look, my computer sticks out on the Maryinskaya local network and on the Internet for several hours every evening - no problem. Well, and also set the antivirus against email catalogues. Horror stories about hackers are just fine for lamers. Although I have Linux, it’s rarely used, well, there’s not a lot of things for it I need it (at least for working with FPGAs - all the software is for Win).

From Chunin Roman To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> Heh - the software firewall does not turn on right away... In 2003 in the Russian Sha> network worm (I don’t remember his name) managed to get into my computer with Win2k Sha> the moment after turning on the computer and before the start of atguard. I'm aware. For me, the connection itself is activated by the script only after downloading systems. ;).

From Chunin Roman To All 11 January 2006

Hello, CHRV It doesn’t matter what you actually use, at the moment all the problems can be solved by properly configuring the OS. Gentlemen, I propose to separate this undoubtedly interesting trade and place it in flame! They've gone very far off topic! And most importantly, the problem of the topic has not been solved.

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello fk0 fk0> Not funny. This is exactly how it is with home visible connected via gprs and fk0> occurs. They manage to fuck in 10 minutes. I don’t even know what to do. Do not use Internet Explorer. You can surf with Firefox/Opera for at least a year the first release of XP and there will be no viruses.

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> It's easier to install Windows, like everyone else does, and get the full one Sha> a bunch of Trojans and spyware that will slow down your computer to a degree Sha> rush to the store to buy the next upgrade, and brotherly Sha> share the contents of your hard drive with hundreds of brave people Sha> kulhatzkeors, who, according to instructions from the KSAKEP magazine, will have Sha> your computer in all devices... :mad: People, are you serious about all this? :rolleyes: What Trojans, where? And where are the brakes? In general, when you listen to people, you get the feeling that I have some kind of unique a secret assembly of Windows that does not slow down or glitch. Well yes, I have ADSL modem with NAT, I turn off all the nice things and don’t use IE and Outlook. So in In Linux, you somehow manage without them, well, in Windows, use Mozilla with opera and you will be happy. Regarding the “slowness” of Windows and the “speed” of Linux, this is to put it mildly not true. I compared different versions of Windows and all of them were optimized built from scratch Gentoo. Under Linux, both in KDE and in Fluxbox, the shell itself as such it’s slower even by eye, it’s the same with browsers - and they work slower and take longer to load. This is compared with XP. And Win9x especially onOn weaker computers, the speed of the penguin is in the tail, and in the mane, and everywhere...

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello fk0 fk0> Not funny. This is exactly how it is with home visible connected via gprs and fk0> occurs. They manage to fuck in 10 minutes. I don’t even know what to do. Do not use Internet Explorer. You can surf with Firefox/Opera for at least a year the first release of XP and there will be no viruses.

From SMT To All 11 January 2006

Hello Sinus lol, Linksoids are sooooo naive

From Nikolay Istomin To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> It's easier to install Windows, like everyone else does, and get the full one Sha> a bunch of Trojans and spyware that will slow down your computer to a degree Sha> rush to the store to buy the next upgrade, and brotherly Sha> share the contents of your hard drive with hundreds of brave people Sha> kulhatzkeors, who, according to instructions from the KSAKEP magazine, will have Sha> your computer in all devices... :mad: People, are you serious about all this? :rolleyes: What Trojans, where? And where are the brakes? In general, when you listen to people, you get the feeling that I have some kind of unique a secret assembly of Windows that does not slow down or glitch. Well yes, I have ADSL modem with NAT, I turn off all the nice things and don’t use IE and Outlook. So in In Linux, you somehow manage without them, well, in Windows, use Mozilla with opera and you will be happy. Regarding the “slowness” of Windows and the “speed” of Linux, this is to put it mildly not true. I compared different versions of Windows and all of them were optimized built from scratch Gentoo. Under Linux, both in KDE and in Fluxbox, the shell itself as such it’s slower even by eye, it’s the same with browsers - and they work slower and take longer to load. This is compared with XP. And Win9x especially onOn weaker computers, the speed of the penguin is in the tail, and in the mane, and everywhere...

From Dobrynin Sergey To All 11 January 2006

Hello fk0 fk0> Not funny. This is exactly how it is with home visible connected via gprs fk0> and it happens. They manage to fuck in 10 minutes. I don’t even know what to do. fk0> Previously I connected via Linux, but now Linux is nearby fk0> no. Install Outpost and all problems will end. Linux is not a wall...

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello fk0 fk0> It's easier to install normal Windows, like everyone else does fk0> and don’t engage in crap Your super statement needs to be slightly adjusted: It’s easier to install a scorched Windows, like everyone else does, and get a full bouquet of Trojans and spyware that will slow down the computer to the point of rushing to the store for purchasing the next upgrade, and fraternally sharing the contents of your hard disk with hundreds of brave kulhatzkeors, who, according to instructions from the KSAKEP magazine they will have your computer in all devices... :mad:

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello, do_se do_> Install Outpost and all problems will end. Linux is not a wall... If you don’t run just anything from under root and update the kernel periodically, then that’s it should be ok (let me remind you that in Linux the firewall is configured at the kernel level).

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello, CHRV CHR> In reality, are you too lazy to install a firewall? I used for example TF, CHR> Atguard, BlackCat and now there is a special firewall in the Maryinsk network CHR> convenient (and required for installation). CHR> I have a computer on the Maryinskaya local network and on the Internet CHR> a few hours every evening - no problem. Well, and also antivirus CHR> set against mail catalogs. CHR> Horror stories about hackers are good for lamers. Heh - the software firewall does not turn on right away... In 2003 on the Russian network the worm (I don’t remember his name) managed to get into my computer with Win2k the moment after turning on the computer and before starting atguard.

From Kirill Frolov To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> Your super saying needs to be slightly adjusted: Sha> It's not mine. It's somehow easier for me to install debian... > It's easier to install Windows, like everyone else does, and get the full one > a bunch of Trojans and spyware that will slow down your computer to a degree > rush to the store to buy the next upgrade, and in a brotherly way > share the contents of your hard drive with hundreds of brave souls > kulhatzkeors, who, according to instructions from the KSAKEP magazine, will have > your computer in all devices... :mad: Not funny. This is exactly how it is with home visible connected via gprs and it happens. They manage to fuck in 10 minutes. I don’t even know what to do. Previously I connected via Linux, but now Linux is nearby no.

From SMT To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> Windows itself is full of holes - worms can get into it without the help of ehplers and Sha> glitches are creeping in haha. Linkuksoids on the membrane forum also said so. however, the person put They specifically need XP SP2 WITHOUT ANY ADJUSTMENTS and not a single bastard has done it. do you want to try? look for the IP somewhere among the topic pages http://forum.membrana.ru/forum/computers.html?parent=1052429562&page=0

From Chunin Roman To All 11 January 2006

Hello SMT For me, it’s generally an indicator that when the Microsoft server was on Unix, Now they are on Windows. And who do they most often try to take down ;).

From Shadow Maker To All 11 January 2006

Hello, Electrician No, I don’t understand... Firewall, put your hands down, or maybe they don’t reach out so that the Trojans didn't climb? Shaos is especially pleasing, fingers are of course good, but stubbornness in Linux - this is bad. If you have arms (at least one) and a brain (at least one) and normal firewall (only one) - Trojans will not get through. Nobody passes me for two years, only if I suddenly, out of stupidity, unload the firewall by stepping into the dispatcher tasks... By the way, Windows is XP without any service packs...

From SMT To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> on the membrane it looks like teapots and lamaki are rubbing - there is no one to blame come on, if you really think so, dump this machine yourself ;-) or do you consider yourself to be one of these groups of users? :-)

From SMT To All 11 January 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> yes, I’m not a hacker - destructive acts are alien to me like, “I haven’t read it, but I condemn it”

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello, Electrician > Regarding the "slowness" of Windows and the "speed" of Linux, this is mild > telling a lie. I compared different versions of Windows and all of myself > optimized Gentoo built from scratch. Under Linux, what in KDE, what > in Fluxbox the shell itself is slower even by eye, with > browsers are the same - they work slower and take longer to load. This > when compared with XP. And Win9x especially on weak penguin computers > speeds up the tail, the mane, and everywhere... I worked at home on a 486DX2-80 with 12 megagrams of memory from 1998 to 2003 - there there was both Windows 95 and 98, and Slakvar - and so the X's just flew into Slakvar (I’ll note, however, that it’s not KDE or gnome, but bare X’s with a couple of simple managers windows), and Windows, sorry, was dying in terrible agony (there were no tears to watch impossible ; ) - and as a result, I was finally killed by the end of the twentieth century, giving complete freedom to Linux on that computer...

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello, Electrician > Do not use Internet Explorer. You can use Firefox/Opera for at least a year > climb with the first release of XP and there will be no viruses. Windows itself is full of holes - worms crawl into it without the help of ehplers and out-glitches

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello SMT SMT> haha. Linkuksoids on the membrane forum also said so. however, man SMT> specially supplied them with XP SP2 WITHOUT ANY ADDITIONAL SETTINGS and none SMT> the bastard didn't leave. do you want to try? look for the IP somewhere among the pages SMT> topics SMT> http://forum.membrana.ru/forum/computers.html?parent=1052429562&page= SMT> 0 SP2 is more difficult to knock down, I agree, but on the membrane it looks like teapots and tinkers they rub - there is no one to blame :wink:

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 11 January 2006

Hello SMT SMT> come on, if you really think so, dump this machine yourself ;-) SMT> SMT> or do you consider yourself to be one of these user groups? :-) Yes, I’m not a hacker - destructive acts are alien to me :smile:

From Alexander Makeev To All 1 February 2006

Hello Sinus Sin> AY is emulated crookedly, there are clearly fewer cycles in the pentagon than in the original Sin> (tested in Condommed (c)E-Mage demo) Sin> Sin> PS. Pent-512 screws on easily. Sin> zyy. give me a port of unreal ;) !!!! if you are interested, you can make ZXMAK.NET suitable for Linux ;) For this I need information on the features of Dotnet environments in Linux, for example mono... Regarding the Pentagon, I’m thinking about making Pentagon 1024 in the next version, but I’m struggling guesses about its compatibility with the Pentagon 512... P.S.: regarding ZXMAK.NET - I'm waiting for discussions (in the "ZXMAK.NET" topic on this forum)... ;)

From Slavik Tretiak To All 2 February 2006

Hello, Alexander Makeev Ale> besides mono, what other .net environments are there for Linux? Of those that work, none. > in C#, Managed C++ - this is for masochists, it seems to me microsoft > specially distorted it this way :mad: so that the snipers would have an incentive to > transition to C# was :rolleyes: yeah. horror. True, C# was also a bit tricky (especially in .NET < 2.0 - no