scandisk

Hello All! How to disable subject verification in ME after an unsuccessful job Windows? Otherwise, this infection works buggy, the check hangs in one place, and Windows never loads automatically (only if you manually close the subject). :( Vega/ex-Style Group. FIDO: 2:5030/1512 ZXNET: 500:812/19 E-mail: vega56@mail.ru ICQ: 144932679

Press RESET immediately, Vlad Sotnikov! On Fri, 04 Jun 04 01:56:52 +0400, Vlad Sotnikov wrote: VS> How to disable subject verification in ME after an unsuccessful job VS> Windows? I’ll answer you this way: you could turn it off if you knew how disable. And if you don’t know how, then there’s no need to turn it off. Because it's small at the beginning, but an uncorrected error in the future can lead to loss files. VS> Otherwise, this infection works buggy, the check hangs in one place, and VS> Windows never loads automatically (only if manually VS> close subject). “Glitchy” - this, of course, you very accurately described what you have there is happening... I assume that he is proposing to fix something there, and displays the selection menu. You should set the options in the scandisk.ini file: ScanTimeOut = On NumPasses = 1 LfnCheck = 1 SpaceCheck = 0 Mount = Always DriveSummary = Off AllSummary = Off Surface = Never CheckHost = Always SaveLog = Append Undo = Never DS_Header = Prompt FAT_Media = Prompt Okay_Entries = Fix Bad_Chain = Prompt Crosslinks = Prompt Boot_Sector = Prompt FSInfo_Sector = Fix Invalid_MDFAT = Prompt DS_Crosslinks = Prompt DS_LostClust = Fix DS_Signatures = Prompt Mismatch_FAT = Prompt Bad_Clusters = PromptBad_Entries = Prompt LostClust = Save There are comments in the scandisk.ini file... Delay in starting question scandisk can be removed as follows: set "AutoScan = 2" in file C:msdos.sys. Yes, the most important thing is that you need to set the options above in the ENVIRONMENT section, it seems so. But not in CUSTOM, otherwise it won’t have any effect actions. If "the check hangs in one place", perhaps just it takes /considerable time/. FAT disk cannot be verified quickly. If you want it fast, set NT to NTFS.

*** Regarding the letter found in the echo MY_MAIL Hello Kirill! June 04, 2004 (it was 10:03 then) Kirill Frolov in his letter to Vlad Sotnikov wrote: VS>> Otherwise, this infection works buggy, the check hangs in one place, and VS>> Windows is never loaded automatically (only if manually VS>> close subject). KF> "Glitchy" - that's, of course, you very accurately described what you have there KF> is happening... I assume that he is offering to fix something there KF> and displays the selection menu. You're guessing wrong. And in general, I’m not as lame as you here you describe! I have been using Microsoft products for 9 years (c), and I am a distinguished professional user of their software. And the meaning of the glitch is the following (more precisely, a manifestation; glitches have no meaning): when check it checks everything in one place. The scroll bar doesn't move. Probably this happens because some changes occur on the disk (due to Windows downloads), and it starts checking all over again. I solved the problem more simply: I removed scandisk.exe from the Windows directory... Vega/ex-Style Group. FIDO: 2:5030/1512 ZXNET: 500:812/19 E-mail: vega56@mail.ru ICQ: 144932679

Press RESET immediately, Vlad Sotnikov! On Sat, 05 Jun 04 19:37:44 +0400, Vlad Sotnikov wrote: KF>> “Glitchy” - that’s, of course, you very accurately described what you have there KF>> is happening... I assume that he is offering to fix something there KF>> and displays the selection menu. VS> Your assumption is wrong. And in general, I’m not as lame as you here VS> you describe! I have been using Microsoft products for 9 years (c), and VS> I am an honored professional user of their software VS> provision. And the meaning of the glitch is as follows (more precisely, a manifestation of the meaning of VS> no glitches): when checking, it checks everything in one place. Scroll bar not VS> moves. This is probably due to the fact that certain VS> changes on the disk (due to Windows loading), and it starts checking VS> first. Did you wait *long*? You probably have one FAT for several tens of GB there, a huge number of clusters and files. Everyone needs to be checked. What do you want? VS> I solved the problem more simply: I removed scandisk.exe from the Windows directory...From now on, get ready for even more terrible glitches and data corruption. I advise you to write down everything especially important on floppy disks in advance. This is why Microsoft is so careful to hide all information from "professional users". True, from the most professional ones don't help...

Hi *Vlad* Vlad Sotnikov wrote All On the topic of scandisk VS> How to disable subject verification in ME after an unsuccessful one VS> does Windows work? Otherwise, this infection is buggy, the check hangs on VS> in one place, and Windows is never loaded automatically (only VS> if you manually close the subject) VS> :( You can try a program to configure hidden features of Windows, For example, I use WinSEr. There is such an opportunity! -=> Best regards, Alexej Shumilow <=- Mobile: +7-912-I won’t tell np: Animals - Districts and Quarters