Jet Storage UDF v.1.5.5 — ZXNet «zxnet.pc»

From Eugene Palenock To All 2 February 2005

Hello All! Has anyone used the subject? How are your impressions? PS spent the whole day solving the problem of convenient batch recording... InCD (the most the latter) persistently hangs itself (somewhere closer to the end of the process) when copying hundreds of files totaling about 4GB to DVD+RW. And sometimes It just hangs up when you try to look at the disk directory or extract it. FileCD! he just doesn't want to work. And the subject so far has normally recorded 4GB of files at a time and does not slow down with each acting like InCD. Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Roman Alexandrov To Eugene Palenock 3 February 2005

Hello Eugene! 02 Feb 05, 12:45, Eugene Palenock wrote to All on the topic "Jet Storage UDF v.1.5.5": EP> Has anyone used the subject? How are your impressions? After about a year of using packet recording firewood from Nero and EasySidi, I spat and I swore... A two-inch HDD in a USB box drives like a child. Happy connections. Roman.

From Eugene Palenock To Roman Alexandrov 3 February 2005

Hello Roman! 03 Feb 05 00:39, Roman Alexandrov -> Eugene Palenock: EP>> Has anyone used the subject? How are your impressions? RA> After about a year of using packet recording firewood from Nero and RA> stay away, spat and swore.... Well, I also try with incd and directcd every year and understand every time that nothing has changed and it’s impossible to use such a glitch... But with There are no problems with the subject yet... RA> A two-inch HDD in a USB box drives like a child. The reliability of blanks is higher. I need it for backup, not for carrying. By the way http://forum.ixbt.com/0031/021546.html Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Roman Alexandrov To Eugene Palenock 4 February 2005

Hello Eugene! 03 Feb 05, 09:24, Eugene Palenock wrote to Roman Alexandrov on the topic "Jet Storage UDF v.1.5.5": RA>> A two-inch HDD in a USB box drives like a child. EP> The reliability of blanks is higher. I need it for backup, not for carrying. Why do you need batch recording for backup??? :-O The volume is smaller, the reliability is lower, you need specific firewood - no, it doesn’t work. Happy connections. Roman.

From Oleg Grigoriev To Eugene Palenock 5 February 2005

Let your enemies, Eugene, die without sons! 02 Feb 2005 at 12:45, Eugene Palenock => All: EP> Has anyone used the subject? How are your impressions? EP> PS. spent the whole day solving the problem of convenient batch recording... InCD (the most EP> the last one) persistently hangs itself (somewhere closer to the end of the process) at EP> copying hundreds of files totaling about 4GB to DVD+RW. And sometimes EP> it just hangs up when you try to look at the disk directory or EP> extract. strange. I've been actively (every day) using incd 4.2.9.1 since May toshiba 5272. It turned out to be very convenient to shove your mp3s onto dvd+rw. collection at least and a small one, but the second ten discs have already been started. :) well, and not only mp3, of course. The only problem encountered was that incd did not get along with alcohol. resolved reading the internet and drinking alcohol. :) win xp corp eng sp1. somewhere since December sp2. EP> FileCD! he just doesn't want to work. But the subject is fine so far EP> recorded 4GB of files at a time and does not slow down with each action like InCD. Hmm, yes, it doesn’t seem to slow down. although I may not know how it should be ok? I'll have to look at the subject. or is the best the enemy of the good?.. :) WBR, Oleg.

From Oleg Grigoriev To Roman Alexandrov 5 February 2005

Let your enemies, Roman, die without sons! 04 Feb 2005 at 18:57, Roman Alexandrov => Eugene Palenock: RA> Why do you need batch recording for backup??? :-O RA> The volume is smaller, the reliability is lower, you need specific firewood - no, no RA> rolls. Oddly enough, when recording to DVD+RW there is no loss in volume. also no problem read on a simple DVD reader under w2k. WBR, Oleg.

From Eugene Palenock To Roman Alexandrov 5 February 2005

Hello Roman! 04 Feb 05 18:57, Roman Alexandrov -> Eugene Palenock: RA>>> A two-inch HDD in a USB box drives like a child. EP>> The reliability of blanks is higher. I need it for backup, not for carrying. RA> Why do you need batch recording for backup??? :-O Convenient. If you do it daily... RA> Volume is smaller No. DVD initially had a normal structure for packet recording. The volume doesn't drop at all. RA> reliability is lower Not lower than HDD. RA> you need specific firewood - no, it doesn’t work. And the authors have problems with their heads because, there is not exactly a UDF, and also an ISO stub The subject is written in a real standard UDF. Windows 98 reads UDF 1.01, 2000 - 1.50, XP - 2.01 You just need to select the desired format and that’s it. PS The advantages of the newer ones are: 1.50 supports bad blocks, 2.x - encryption and access rights (can be inherited from NTFS). Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Vlad Sotnikov To Oleg Grigoriev 5 February 2005

Hello Oleg! February 05, 2005 (it was 01:26 then) Oleg Grigoriev in his letter to Eugene Palenock wrote: OG> the only problem encountered was that incd did not get along with alcohol. You need to drink less. Vega/ex-Style Group. FIDO: 2:5030/1512 ZXNET: 500:812/19 E-mail: vega56@mail.ru ICQ: 144932679

From Roman Alexandrov To Oleg Grigoriev 5 February 2005

Hello, Oleg! 05 Feb 05, 01:44, Oleg Grigoriev wrote to Roman Alexandrov on the topic "Jet Storage UDF v.1.5.5": RA>> Why batch recording for backup??? :-O RA>> The volume is smaller, the reliability is lower, you need specific firewood - no, no RA>> rolls. OG> oddly enough, when recording to dvd+rw there is no loss in volume. also without OG> problems read on a simple DVD reader under w2k. Interesting. This means progress.... However, I still don’t see the point. Happy connections. Roman.

From Oleg Grigoriev To Roman Alexandrov 6 February 2005

Let your enemies, Roman, die without sons! 05 Feb 2005 at 18:06, Roman Alexandrov => Oleg Grigoriev: OG>> oddly enough, when recording to dvd+rw there is no loss in volume. OG>> can also be read without problems on a simple DVD reader under w2k. RA> Interesting. It means progress.... However, I still don’t see RA> meaning. convenient. I press f5 in the headlight and move on. :-) WBR, Oleg.

From Ivan Kuvshinov To Oleg Grigoriev 6 February 2005

RA>> Why batch recording for backup??? :-O RA>> The volume is smaller, the reliability is lower, you need specific firewood - no, no OG> oddly enough, when recording to dvd+rw there is no loss in volume. also without OG> problems can be read on a simple DVD reader under w2k. There are still some disadvantages. So, for example, the recording ends not when the LED stops burning, but when you press pull out. And I had a couple of times where I was pulled out by everyone According to the rules, the disk lost all information - it was recorded but not there. :( True, I restored it using this method: I made an image on disk and there is an insertion of several hundred bytes at each interval, I cut them out, and the beginning and end of the file was determined signature, well, like “Rar!”, then I use my program for reading mail, I saved everything separately, but there was a problem. There is a lot of unnecessary writing in between, so the volume less. Now I can’t really use it, I have to pull it out twice to check. Well, the pros, of course, are not necessary rewrite the entire disk to add a replacement pair files. And besides, in order to rewrite it you need to first copy.. so batch recording rules. And I use WriteCD-RW v3.0 (c) Softarch for reading, because InCD doesn’t work with 95s, and some others, but this one runs at 9x?KIA

From Valerij Kozhevnikoff To Ivan Kuvshinov 8 February 2005

Hello, Ivan! Sun, 06 Feb 05 at 08:48, Ivan Kuvshinov -> Oleg Grigoriev: IK> There are still some disadvantages. So, for example, the recording ends IK> not when the LED stops burning, but when you press IK> pull out. And a couple of times I had it pulled out all over IK> according to the rules, the disk lost all the information - it was recorded but not there. :( Try Direct CD from the ECDC kit. This one won't give up the disk until he finishes everything. (it blocks the disc ejection button). Here are the minimum system requirements for Roxio Easy CD Creator: IBM PC or compatible 200 MHz or faster Windows 95/98/NT4/2000/ME · 32 MB RAM · 205 MB free hard disk space (at least 140 MB of this space must reside on the system boot drive) 800x600 display, 256 colors minimum, 16-bit color recommended It weighs 205 MB fully installed - along with a carload of unnecessary software, like CD cover editor, video editor, sound editor, samples of everything this, etc. trash. If you don’t put the trash in, it weighs 20 times less. WBR, Jason. _/(ZX)/_ /*e-mail: jason2000(Columbus)yandex.ru ICQ: 62235830*/ /np:/ *silence*

From Aleksander Kudelya To Eugene Palenock 8 February 2005

Peace to your home, /_Eugene!/_ _02 February 2005_, *_Eugene Palenock*_ wrote to *_All*_: EP> extract. FileCD! he just doesn't want to work. But the subject is fine so far EP> recorded 4GB of files at a time and does not slow down with each action like InCD. Where can I drag it and how much does it weigh? We'll write again /_Eugene!/_!

From Eugene Palenock To Valerij Kozhevnikoff 9 February 2005

Hello Valerij! 08 Feb 05 14:53, Valerij Kozhevnikoff -> Ivan Kuvshinov: IK>> There are still some disadvantages. So, for example, the recording ends IK>> not when the LED stops burning, but when you press IK>> pull out. And a couple of times I had it pulled out all over IK>> according to the rules, the disk lost all information - it was recorded but not there. :( VK> Try Direct CD from the ECDC kit. It's now called Roxio Drag To Disc. I suspect the old DirectCD may behave inappropriately in XP. Download this: ed2k://|file|Roxio%20Easy%20CD&DVD%20Creator%207-Keymaker.rar|22641|72F2446C694 6B34B48873E35F2BE4515|/ ed2k://|file|Roxio.Easy.Media.Creator.v7.0-CD1_Eselfilme.com.nrg|712463292|19DA 05DF5BDFD6B9A7B41A786E602F32|/ ed2k://|file|Roxio.Easy.Media.Creator.v7.1.1.189.Update.rar|120490696|B9B4024A7 FC0560B2D8795E5265ED712|/ Tested, it works. There is no need to download CD2, there is clipart and nothing more. VK> 205 MB it weighs fully installed - along with a carload of unnecessary VK> software, such as a disc cover editor, video editor, sound editor, VK> samples of all this, etc. trash. What's interesting is that now this junk won't turn off.In the installer you can disable Drag-To-Disc, DVD-Burn, Creator, but not junk. The rubbish was installed in version 7 at 190 MB, I suspect that it can be trivial erase. Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Eugene Palenock To Aleksander Kudelya 15 February 2005

Hello, Alexander! 08 Feb 05 15:13, Aleksander Kudelya -> Eugene Palenock: EP>> extract. FileCD! he just doesn't want to work. But the subject is fine so far EP>> recorded 4GB of files at a time and does not slow down with each action as EP>> InCD. AK> Where can you pull it and how much does it weigh? skif-soft.com But it turned out to suck too. Doesn't work with Nera. And he wants money (and after breaking down he says that the drive is faulty). Best regards, Evgeniy.