Good emulator
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.pc»
From andreil → To All 25 October 2005
Hello, Vladimir Kladov
Vla> how is there no SCL? did you mix up the letters? Or what version do you have...
Yes, apparently not! I do the following: 1) open *.SCL; 2) "ALT+B". And nothing! Just
is reset to TR-DOS and the cursor blinks. :confused:
And the version is the latest (I don’t remember which one, but I downloaded it for weeks
two back).
From Vladimir Kladov → To All 25 October 2005
Hello, ewgeny7
ewg> For me, the most convenient and soul-gratifying is Real Spectrum. Working
ewg> under any Windows. Can work with REAL TR-DOS floppies.
ewg> Quite a good monitor-debugger (although I have never really used it
ewg> used).
ewg> And the best emulator is REAL SPECTRUM. More real than him
ewg> it can't be :)
Reality is good while you’re young and have plenty of time. In emulators
there must be things that don’t exist in reality: fast loading (well, it’s in
many good emulators, even if emulating tape or disk), substitution
keys (up to auto-FIRE, but not everywhere and not everywhere as I wanted,
that’s why I made my own emulator), rollback at any time as much as you want...
(and this was in some kind of emulator, but there’s probably nothing more interesting in it and
was not). Yeah, one more thing: playing online games that are intended for 2 or more
players... (no, well, don’t use VNC, or RAdmin - that’s not serious. Here
I'm the first so far). And also - for now from the realm of dreams: uniformization of speed
(slow down problem in games when you need to draw a lot of objects),
anti-attribute clamp... (256 colors don’t count, what does remaking games have to do with it,We are talking about completely getting rid of clashing - completely automatic). B
emulators for Windows, no matter how close they are to reality, absolute
It will not be possible to achieve uniform animation. I think I succeeded
better than others (although I don’t stop others from thinking that they have it better than others)
me. The final decision is up to the player). But perhaps this is the only one
"realism" that you should strive for in an emulator. Down with reality, yeah
Long live comfort! Program in an emulator with built-in good
assembler is also, by the way, more convenient than pretending to be cool or using
standalone-cross-complers. IMO (no need for wars, this is IMO. And I’m almost 40.
I have the right to IMO).
From Vladimir Kladov → To All 25 October 2005
Hello, ian
ian> Which subject do you recommend? :rolleyes:
What does SCL have to do with it? Alt+B doesn't work - Alt+B doesn't work. I made it
a little different than double-clicking on a file in the disk browser. Double click
more reliable. But this applies to any TR-DOS format, even .TRD, even .FDI, .UDI,
just a set of hobeta files. And the statement sounds like “not supported by SCL”.
It should be: Alt+B doesn't work well. Still, a slightly different statement, not
Is it true?
From Vladimir Kladov → To All 25 October 2005
Hello, scl^mc
scl> what I don't like about almost all emulators is that
scl> Spec's screen seems square. the only one I know about
scl> and which does not suffer from this problem is z80stealh. in my opinion
scl> one of the most convenient emulators (however, tr-dos emulation is done
scl> is not 100%, which is why some boots do not work correctly, for example
scl> in the 1st issue of the 3bit magazine). but emulation of ay in z80stealh'e is one of
scl> the best :)
Square? Can you put a ruler on the screen and measure it?
This stealth crackles under XP. It's like it's on the radio all the time
interference breaks through.
From SMT → To All 26 October 2005
Hello, ian
> ay emulation in z80stealh'e is one of the best
if under dos+ess driver, then yes, I was dragging myself 5 years ago :) and under 44.1khz -
nothing special, it’s already like that everywhere