[FWD] why do we need WIN ME

============================================================================== * Forwarded by Eugene Palenock (500:95/468.468) * Region : RU.WINDOWS.ME ("Windows ME") * From: Karen Abramyantz, 2:5085/45.66 (25 Aug 02 00:22) * To: Eugeniy Voronov, * Topic: why do we need WIN ME ============================================================================== @Host: OS: Windows ME 4.90.3000 i586 ID: 52782-005-0009147-00112 @RealName: Karen Abramyantz AKA: Kunzite Host: 666:666/0@Invaders.net ░▒▓█ #/Windows/# #_*/ME/*_# /_Konnichiwa, Eugeniy-san!_/ ~17:20 23 August 2002, Eugeniy Voronov explained something specifically to All: EV> please explain to me why I need to install ME? Let's explain please. EV> well, more beautiful than 98, so what. but it’s normal to work in them EV> impossible. You cannot work in any system with crooked hands. EV> please provide a specific example of their usefulness. You can convince with a hundred examples, but the main thing I liked: 1) sustainability (yes, yes, licensed English) 2) system restore (I didn’t use it before, I turned it off, but now the ability to roll back to the desired number according to the settings is very useful) 3) A bunch of codecs inside, a bunch of new drivers, almost full format support drivers for win2k, built-in features like Scaner & Camera wizard, etc., etc.4) Directs are better, everything is configured conveniently in the kernel, the new 5.5 explorer is not as braking as 6.0, but more stable than 5.0 5) The new installer is already in the system. 6) Intelligent memory allocation for applications (like Norton Speed Launcher, after the first launch of the program, it is written down how best to launch it and how much memory to allocate) 7) Improved (much) scandisk and defragmenter. Last completed with added intelligence, that is, moving files of the same directory together, and applications that are often launched to the beginning. There’s a lot more I could list, just off the top of my head. By the way, I recently noticed that identical powerful machines, in 98 and in ME several are launched differently identical programs. This happens faster in ME. And the most important thing (although I noticed this only in my English so far) is that when any task freezes when trying to shutdown or reboot, it 100% of the time it correctly unloaded this task without hanging the kernel. EV> otherwise one gets the impression that the small ones only created them EV> in order to smooth out the transition from 98 to 2000. 2000 was created a little earlier. Well, ME came out almost immediately, as the last of lines 9x. EV> I apologize in advance for somewhat critical statements. there's just no way EV> I can switch to this Windows. everyone praises me but I just can’t understand what’s going on EV> good stuff. although I know that I need to put it because it needs to be soon EV> go to CRAP. I personally don’t recommend using XP, IMHO it’s a complete waste of megabytes. But echotag (and the people who have worked in it for a long time will support me), is much more stable 98, works faster and better. It is natural, all glitches and bugs 98 have been fixed. New ones have appeared, but which Windows doesn’t have them? The new ones are not so significant in the work They don't interfere much. /*Sayonara, Eugeniy*/ /Kusu ningen no tamashi no mansion.../ _*mailto: kunzit@sailormoon.com*_ -+- [Michiru] [Knight sabers] [Kenshin-gumi] [Outers] [Yuri 4ever] + Origin: My rug is covered in a cat design... honestly!! (2:5085/45.66) ================================================================================