Font size — ZXNet «zxnet.pc»

From Wladimir Bulchukey To All 23 June 2005

Hello(s), All...! Hardware issue. The subject item in the screen properties is grayed out. Video card S3 Trio 3D/2X. On other machines with more powerful video cards I configured (due to the transition to TFT monitors - on their 17 inches it is small by default, and, as you know, changing the screen resolution is not recommended; have to change the subject). What is this, now we’re trying to fool our bosses about a new video card? Thank you. With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]

From Valerij Kozhevnikoff To Wladimir Bulchukey 24 June 2005

Hello, Wladimir! Thu, 23 Jun 05 at 00:32, Wladimir Bulchukey -> All: WB> Hardware issue. WB> The subject item in the screen properties is grayed out. Video card S3 Trio 3D/2X. I used this one. Exactly on a 17" monitor. WB> On other machines with more powerful video devices I configured (due to The video power doesn’t matter here. You shouldn't play games. WB> transition to TFT monitors - on their 17 inches it is small by default, and WB> Changing the screen resolution, as you know, is not recommended; have to WB> change subject). Is this what it’s like to scam the bosses about a new video card? What axis? What kind of firewood does it cost? I had fonts from the manufacturer switched as you please. If you look, maybe I’ll find it on blanks. WBR, Jason. _/(ZX)/_ /*e-mail: jason2000(not a cat)yandex.ru ICQ: 62235830*/ /np:/ *pandemonium*

From Eugene Palenock To Valerij Kozhevnikoff 24 June 2005

Hello Valerij! 24 Jun 05 01:58, Valerij Kozhevnikoff -> Wladimir Bulchukey: WB>> transition to TFT monitors - on their 17 inches it is small by default, but WB>> changing the screen resolution, as you know, is not recommended; have to WB>> change subject). Is this what it’s like, now we’re trying to deceive the bosses for a new one WB>> video card? VK> What axis? What kind of firewood does it cost? I had the ones from the manufacturer VK> fonts were switched as desired. If you search, maybe I’ll find it on VK> blanks. By the way, I don’t know how to upgrade the LCD monitor later because of this... The resolution needs to be set high... And if you enlarge the fonts, they don’t just get bigger: 1.line spacing is lost. 2.almost all the tray icons are spoiled; they are not just blots, but definitely drawn and dynamically displaying something. 3.Images are scaled in the browser. Not scary for photos, but for sure The rendered graphics are terrible. As a result, I live at 1024*768 by 17"... Because it turned out to increase the fonts unacceptable. Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Wladimir Bulchukey To Eugene Palenock 24 June 2005

Hello, Eugene...! 24 Jun 05 03:08, Eugene Palenock -> Valerij Kozhevnikoff: EP> By the way, I don’t know how to upgrade the LCD monitor later because of this... EP> The resolution should be set high... And if you enlarge the fonts, then I have a situation determined by circumstances, but not by my own choice - SES requires changing monitors to LCDs according to hygiene standards for schools. Now we have allocated funds and bought the first 5 monitors. Axle everywhere W2K Prof. The firewood for the S3 Trio is original from the manufacturer, under W2K. Now we're trying to decide which is better: increase the font size with the inevitable sacrifice of side effects, or leave the standard 96 dpi at 1280x1024 pixels on 17 inches and sticking your nose into the screen, which is also not good... S3 Trio will probably have to be replaced with a modern card. With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]

From Nikolaj Amosov To Wladimir Bulchukey 24 June 2005

Hello, Wladimir! Thursday 23 June 2005 00:32:27 Wladimir Bulchukey -> All: WB> (due to the transition to TFT monitors - on their 17 inches WB> default small, WB> and changing the screen resolution, as you know, is not recommended; A lot depends on the monitor. Try changing the resolution - you might like it. On my TFT 17" I never set it higher than 800x600. The image quality does not suffer. [REAL ZX]

From Roman Alexandrov To Nikolaj Amosov 25 June 2005

Hello Nikolaj! 24 Jun 05, 22:16, Nikolaj Amosov wrote to Wladimir Bulchukey on the topic "Font size": NA> A lot depends on the monitor. Try changing the resolution - NA> you might like it. NA> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA> The image quality does not suffer. Mmmmm.... TFT can only be used in passport mode, all others the interpolated options look absolutely sickening. Happy connections. Roman.

From Eugene Palenock To Wladimir Bulchukey 25 June 2005

Hello, Wladimir! 24 Jun 05 07:36, Wladimir Bulchukey -> Eugene Palenock: WB> I have a situation determined by circumstances, but not my own WB> choice - SES requires changing monitors to LCD according to hygienic standards WB> for schools. Now we have allocated funds and bought the first 5 monitors. Axis everywhere WB> W2K Prof. The firewood for the S3 Trio is original from the manufacturer, under W2K. Now WB> trying to decide what is better: increasing the font size with the inevitable sacrifice WB> for side effects, or leave the standard 96 dpi at 1280x1024 WB> points at 17 inches and sticking your nose into the screen, which is also not WB> good... S3 Trio, apparently, will have to be replaced with a modern card. By the way, the font changes in two places. 1. you apparently know; 2. screen properties - design - font size. The effects are completely different. The second one seems to have fewer glitches. Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Eugene Palenock To Kirill Frolov 25 June 2005

Hello Kirill! 25 Jun 05 00:11, Kirill Frolov -> All: KF> museum... Who would recommend a card for: tv-in, tv-out, support for everything KF> this in linux and w2k3... Apparently, only ATI or Nvidia, because there are all kinds KF> avermedia is not friendly with Linux. Maybe older and more expensive models KF> much better? If you are talking about “better” in terms of video input and video output, then look at what kind of chips are there there are entrances and exits. In general, they did not change often; there are 4 of them for inputs. The development was in terms of teletext support (if the signal from the video from the tuner catch), and increase the speed and quality of capture. And the viewing mode is everywhere (with inputs built into the video card) are approximately the same. KF> And here’s another pressing question: do I need a TV-in for KF> Spectrum viewing in the window. What kind of software is there for this? KF> use? I mean Windows. That's usually what's included with the card ;) Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Eugene Palenock To Nikolaj Amosov 25 June 2005

Hello Nikolaj! 24 Jun 05 22:16, Nikolaj Amosov -> Wladimir Bulchukey: NA> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA> The image quality does not suffer. Gee. So you set the resolution to multiple, apparently you have it holds up to 1600*1200 ;) But set it to 1024*768 - and everything will go bad right away... Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Wladimir Bulchukey To Nikolaj Amosov 25 June 2005

Hello, Nikolaj...! 24 Jun 05 22:16, Nikolaj Amosov -> Wladimir Bulchukey: NA> A lot depends on the monitor. Try changing the resolution - NA> you might like it. NA> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA> The image quality does not suffer. It doesn't roll. Yes, and it can’t roll - the points are set in advance, and it’s fine Only nominal resolution can be displayed. It sucks even displaying text mode MS DOS, and these are some symbols. With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]

From Aleksey Senilov To All 26 June 2005

Hello, _/All/_! I don’t know why you’re arguing here, but I currently have a TFT 17” monitor. at a resolution of 1280*1024, and everything is clearly visible, no need to move your nose. Vision I am -5, and yet... Others who have visited me agree with this. Maybe it depends on specific monitors? PS: I have a Samsung SyncMaster 710N. See you again! Best regards, Thann.

From Eugene Palenock To Kirill Frolov 27 June 2005

Hello Kirill! 26 Jun 05 21:08, Kirill Frolov -> Eugene Palenock: EP>> If you are talking about “better” in terms of video input and video output, then look EP>> what input and output chips are there. In general, they did not change often EP>> there are 4 of them for inputs. Development was progressing in terms of teletext support EP>> (if from video from signal tuner KF> What, is there something to read teletext with? Just not with your eyes. KF> I once saw that avermedia is given - there you can only read with your eyes KF> it is possible (but, for example, it cannot be written to a file - why such teletext?) For cards based on Philips SAA7113 and higher - there is a utility from the VideoLive package, it dumps it into a text file. Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Nikolaj Amosov To Roman Alexandrov 29 June 2005

Hello Roman! Saturday 25 June 2005 09:46:45 Roman Alexandrov -> Nikolaj Amosov: NA>> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA>> The image quality does not suffer. RA> Mmmmm.... TFT can only be used on a passport RA> mode, all others are interpolated RA> the options look absolutely sickening. I believe my eyes and continue to say that 800x600 is instead passport 1280x1024 look very decent. Artifact Eye does not notice due to interpolation... [REAL ZX]

From Nikolaj Amosov To Wladimir Bulchukey 29 June 2005

Hello, Wladimir! Saturday 25 June 2005 16:53:49 Wladimir Bulchukey -> Nikolaj Amosov: NA>> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA>> The image quality does not suffer. WB> Only nominal resolution can be displayed. Sucks WB> is displayed even WB> text mode MS DOS, and wow, what characters. It's different on different monitors. Text mode in mine I am completely satisfied with the monitor. [REAL ZX]

From Nikolaj Amosov To Eugene Palenock 29 June 2005

Hello Eugene! Saturday 25 June 2005 16:19:24 Eugene Palenock -> Nikolaj Amosov: NA>> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA>> The image quality does not suffer. EP> Gee. So you set the resolution to multiple, apparently you have it EP> holds up to 1600*1200 ;) No, only 1280x1024 EP> And set it to 1024*768 - that's all EP> will spoil immediately... But this mode is really visually crooked than 800x600... [REAL ZX]

From Nikolaj Amosov To Aleksey Senilov 29 June 2005

Hello, Alexey! Sunday June 26, 2005 21:28:40 Aleksey Senilov -> All: AS> I don’t know why you’re arguing here, but my monitor is now like AS> times TFT 17", I live AS> at a resolution of 1280*1024, and everything is perfectly visible with your nose AS> is not necessary. AS> PS: I have a Samsung SyncMaster 710N. I have the same one too. [REAL ZX]

From Roman Alexandrov To Nikolaj Amosov 30 June 2005

Hello Nikolaj! 29 Jun 05, 21:46, Nikolaj Amosov wrote to Roman Alexandrov on the topic "Size font": NA>>> On my TFT 17" I never set it above 800x600. NA>>> The image quality does not suffer. RA>> Mmmm.... TFT can only be used on a passport RA>> mode, all others are interpolated RA>> the options look absolutely nauseating. NA> I believe my eyes and continue to say that 800x600 is instead NA> passport 1280x1024 look very decent. Artifact Eye NA> does not notice from interpolation... Well, that means your eyesight is weak and you’re lucky, I personally haven’t seen a single one "liquid" monitor where the interpolated resolution would look normal. I’m talking about how the photos look on cheap (less than $1000-$1500) TFT monitors In general, I’m silent - it’s complete garbage. Because I'm a photographer, this crap isn't good for me. in general, only CRT. By the way, 800x600 is generally very small for work, on both of mine 17" costs 1152x864 and I really want to buy a 19" one for my home cathode ray monitor until they completely disappear from sale, so that increase the resolution further. Happy connections. Roman.

From Nikolaj Amosov To Roman Alexandrov 4 July 2005

Hello Roman! Thursday 30 June 2005 09:34:52 Roman Alexandrov -> Nikolaj Amosov: NA>> I believe my eyes and continue to say that 800x600 NA>> instead NA>> passport 1280x1024 look very decent. Eye NA>> artifacts NA>> does not notice from interpolation... RA> Well, that means your eyesight is weak and you’re lucky, I personally don’t Up close I can see well. RA> About how RA> look like on cheap (less than $1000-1500) TFT monitors RA> photos I’m generally silent RA> - complete garbage. Because I'm a photographer, I don't like this crap RA> is generally suitable, only CRT. Since I am not a photographer, I only look at photos on photo paper. Maybe you should do the same? RA> By the way, 800x600 is generally very small for work, y What is meant by work? At home I use my computer for console-emulator purposes, reading fidomail, listening to music. At work, 800x600 by 17" is also enough for any purpose: PCAD, word, Keil, AutoCAD. But staring at small dots in large ones The last thing I want is permissions... RA> me on both my 17" cars RA> costs 1152x864 and I really want to buy 19 for my home RA> inch electron beam RA> monitor before they completely disappear from sale, so that RA> increase the resolution further. So it’s probably better to take 21" so that you have some extra? [REAL ZX]

From Roman Alexandrov To Nikolaj Amosov 6 July 2005

Hello Nikolaj! 04 Jul 05, 21:54, Nikolaj Amosov wrote to Roman Alexandrov on the topic "Size font": NA>>> I believe my eyes and continue to say that 800x600 NA>>> instead NA>>> passport 1280x1024 look very decent. Eye NA>>> artifacts NA>>> does not notice from interpolation... RA>> Well, that means your eyesight is weak and you’re lucky, I personally don’t NA> I can see well up close. So this is a feature of your vision. RA>> About how RA>> look like on cheap (less than $1000-1500) TFT monitors RA>> photos I’m generally silent RA>> - complete garbage. Because I'm a photographer, I don't like this crap RA>> generally suitable, only CRT. NA> Since I am not a photographer, I only look at photos on photo paper. NA> Maybe you should do the same? Before they get there (on paper) they must be selected and processed, so this is exactly what is impossible to do on TFT due to its extreme sucks. And somehow I don’t want to print everything (at the moment on a screw there are about 3500 photos). RA>> By the way, 800x600 is generally very small for work, y NA> What is meant by work? Mainly working with photographs. NA> At home I use my computer for NA> console-emulator purposes, reading email, listening to music. NA> At work, 800x600 by 17" is also enough for any purpose: PCAD, NA> word, Keil, AutoCAD. Of all the above, 600x800 is only suitable for fidomail and music, for the rest is not enough and uncomfortable. NA> But staring at small dots in large ones NA> permissions are the last thing I want... And he said you see well. RA>> me on both my 17" cars RA>> costs 1152x864 and I really want to buy 19 for my home RA>> inch electron beam RA>> monitor before they completely disappear from sale, so RA>> increase the resolution further. NA> So it’s probably better to take 21" so that you have some extra? 1) My last name is not Rockefeller. 2) It simply won’t fit on my desk. Happy connections. Roman.