Adobe Photoass

Don't slaughter the cash cow that lays golden eggs, All...! Source data: Photoshop 7.0 rus distribution in the form of a folder on a screw (copied from a borrowed CD). Plot: The distribution turned out to be completely English. But this is bullshit. Next. Since the distribution is available as a folder on the hard drive, I put it from a folder. On the workstation there is only the C: drive. The installation wizard swears wildly in English about what you are installing on the same disk from which you are installing, and sternly asks Are you sure? Well, I'm sure. The wizard installs and it seems really puts. Photoshop runs under administrator, like Ok. Next, we log in under the first user we come across, and _also Ok_. But with any next user, a message box from _Editor pops up registry_ with a message about the impossibility of importing PHOTOSHOP.REG, they say, like the file is occupied by the system or something else, a good dozen versions, that is, he himself does not know why. If you ignore the message - The subject starts, but I can’t make sure it’s fully operational, since I'm not an artist :) . Just in case, I tried to open grants full access to all Adobe registry branches, but does not help; opening /Adobe in Program Files for full access doesn't work either. It’s interesting that the _first_ ordinary user launches the subject without errors, and after the administrator. In the future, the administrator and the first The user always launches the subject without errors. The question is, accordingly, wheredig: misuse of distribution; version unsuitable subject for W2K; crooked distribution; demolish and install another version (which one?); check that, despite the message, the subject is operational (how to check?), and _to kill_ (the worst thing ;-( ). Basically, there are 5th versions lying around somewhere, how much weaker are they than the 7th? It is intended to be used for retouching scanned old photographs. for the school museum by students in the next school year. I myself have never used Photoshop. Historically, largely degree from the low power of the material base, I have developed a tendency to ZSoft graphic tools (PhotoFinish), which I currently own masterly, damn it :), and relearning, as always, is even worse. With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]

hi Wladimir! I am responding to your letter dated 06/01/2004, then written by Wladimir Bulchukey to All, and then it was 20:34:52 on the clock. WB> Don't cut the cash cow that lays golden eggs, All...! WB> Source data: Photoshop 7.0 rus distribution in the form of a folder on a screw WB> (copied from a borrowed CD). WB> Story: WB> since I'm not an artist :) . Just in case, I tried to open it WB> for full access to all Adobe registry branches, but does not help; You can look at regmon (www.sysinternals.com) to see what is written there and where. and this pig also carefully puts his settings in /Documents and Settings/user_takoj-to/Application Data/adobe/... check what he has there, maybe there is some kind of jamb there ;) There is also a bug on Russian mastdays with the temp directory. I have 7.0.1 (7.0+pack), I also installed it from the screw, the flight is normal. WB> I have never used Photoshop myself. Historically, largely WB> degree from the low power of the material base, I have developed an inclination WB> to ZSoft graphic tools (PhotoFinish), which I currently own WB> masterly, damn it :), and switching, as always, is even more scary. bad luck beginning ;) Bay W.B.R. rNd [Team: X-Tension] [FREE] [BSB] [GMD]

Don't slaughter the cash cow that lays golden eggs, All...! 01 Jun 04 20:34, Wladimir Bulchukey -> All: WB> But with any next user, a message box from _Editor appears WB> registry_ with a message about the impossibility of importing PHOTOSHOP.REG , It doesn't come out anymore. I opened the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT branch for writing according to contents of the Photoshop.reg file. But this is crap, software shouldn’t demand changes to the default system settings, and not everyone the user knows how and will dare to use the registry editor. Something's here still not the case. The subject is now working. But the mentioned registry branch is now open for registration to everyone. I have access to regedit and regedt32 forbidden to users, but this is the second action about which (after the actual registry editor) the user is not required to know. How to configure the subject regular user? Call the administrator? What, I wonder, is fraught with the open state of a registry branch? Damn... :-/ With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]

Press RESET immediately, Wladimir Bulchukey! On Tue, 01 Jun 04 19:34:52 +0400, Wladimir Bulchukey wrote: WB> But with any next user, a message box from _Editor appears WB> registry_ with a message about the impossibility of importing PHOTOSHOP.REG, dir /s /b C: | find "PHOTOSHOP.REG" dir c:path ofilePHOTOSHOP.REG cacls c:path ofilePHOTOSHOP.REG WB> for full access to all Adobe registry branches, but does not help; WB> opening /Adobe in Program Files for full access does not work either. It can't be like that. WB> curve distribution; demolish and install another version (which one?); www.gimp.ru (just don’t yell, they say there are no color profiles and something else - it’s especially funny to hear from people who don’t even know why they need these profiles) The Russian language is supported almost fully there - for your In my opinion this is more important. WB> Basically, there are 5th versions lying around somewhere, how much weaker are they than the 7th? WB> It is intended to be used for retouching scanned old photographs WB> for the school museum by students in the next school year. Yes, for this you desperately need a crookedly stolen professional editor, and certainly the latest version... WB> I myself have never used Photoshop. Historically, largely WB> degrees from the low power of the material base, I have developed a tendency Even more so.

Don't slaughter the cash cow that lays golden eggs, Kirill...! 03 Jun 04 00:59, Kirill Frolov -> Wladimir Bulchukey: KF> dir /s /b C: | find "PHOTOSHOP.REG" KF> dir c:path ofilePHOTOSHOP.REG KF> cacls c:path ofilePHOTOSHOP.REG KF> This cannot be. Ok, I figured it out, it works now, the next question is about the vulnerability open-for-write registry branch and the crookedness of this approach to setup. KF> www.gimp.ru (just don’t yell, they say there are no color profiles and KF> something else - it’s especially funny to hear from people who don’t even know why KF> they need these profiles) Moreover, I don’t even know what it is :). Although Photoshop talks about them when you first launch them :) . WB>> Use is intended for retouching old scanned WB>> photos WB>> for the school museum by students in the next school year. KF> Yes, for this you desperately need a crookedly stolen professional KF> edited, and certainly the latest version... WB>> I myself have never used Photoshop. KF> Moreover.The teacher who will lead this case said to put Photoshop. My business is small :), I won’t do it. Perhaps she has never heard of anything but Photoshop :) . If I were doing this, A Photo Finish THIS way would be enough for me and there is still some left :) . And she told them Most likely he doesn’t even know how to use it. I also use an extremely little-known editor called GrafX2. Phil recommended him to me as, in his words, the most stage-worthy graphic editor. I mastered it completely. Basically, these With two software I can do everything I need on schedule. For example, a photo montage for April 1 (on my website :)) was made in GrafX2. As soon as a task appears in front of me that is impossible to accomplish in these editors, I'll try to learn something new. But not before, the era of curiosity It’s already over for me a long time ago. And I'm not an artist, I say, I'm just like 'went out for a walk' ((c) Gleb Zheglov). With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]

Hello, Wladimir! 01 Jun 04 20:34, Wladimir Bulchukey -> All: WB> Basically, there are 5th versions lying around somewhere, how much weaker are they than the 7th? WB> Use is intended for retouching old scanned WB> photographs for the school museum by students in the next school year. WB> I myself have never used Photoshop. Historically, largely WB> degrees from the low power of the material base, I have developed a tendency WB> to ZSoft graphic tools (PhotoFinish), which I currently own WB> masterly, damn it :), and relearning, as always, is even worse. Take Paint Shop Pro 8. It has a more intuitive interface for those who don't use Photoshop. saw. But functionally it is not inferior to it. Best regards, Evgeniy.

Press RESET immediately, Wladimir Bulchukey! On Wed, 02 Jun 04 21:04:09 +0400, Wladimir Bulchukey wrote: WB>> But with any next user, a message box from _Editor appears WB>> registry_ with a message about the impossibility of importing PHOTOSHOP.REG , WB> Doesn't come out anymore. I opened the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT branch for writing according to WB> contents of the Photoshop.reg file. But this is a crapshoot, the software shouldn’t WB> require changes to the default system settings, and not everyone Correct photoshop.reg, extract from it what is written in classes root - it was specified once during installation and is no longer required. In general, leave only the HKLM_CURRENT_USER branch in *.reg. WB> the user knows how and will dare to use the registry editor. Something's here Yes, you have to be a genius... WB> still wrong. The subject is now working. But the mentioned registry branch WB> is now open for writing to everyone. I have access to regedit and regedt32 WB> has banned users, but this is the second action about which (after the actual WB> registry editor) the user is not required to know. How to configure the subject What nonsense. It’s okay that the “user” is not obliged. But not a computer useris executed, as some people think, and programs that don’t know what the user is not obliged to do there. And they have every right (why is a private matter programmer) use regedit to work with the registry, not something more. REGEDIT is a system program that MUST be available. As for banning users, that's nonsense. No one bothers the user write a primitive regedit substitute on Windows Scripting Host. That's what this squalor allows. You have access to cscript.exe and wscript.exe is also prohibited? And that's not all - there's a lot more other means... WB> regular user? Call the administrator? WB> What, I wonder, is fraught with the open state of the registry branch? Complete destruction.

Don't slaughter the cash cow that lays golden eggs, All...! Thanks everyone, everything is OK, the issue is closed! With the best - Wlodek # wlblack(@)newmail.ru # http://wlodeks.narod.ru [ZX] [500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Old Russians]