zxnet.rou
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»
Hello Eugene!
Tue 08-May-2001 11:13, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to me:
EP> And I doubt the need for something rou. It is necessary that IUC
EP> wrote, and then there are no problems where to route. And probably there is
EP> it makes sense to introduce a U-flag to indicate an email sysop (by
EP> IUC, after all, there is often a robot standing that nails everything on the left
EP> That’s why Moscow has zxnet95admin@mailru.com). Like
EP> U,SYS:zxnet95admin@mailru.com or U,SYS:IUC if matching.
EP> Or U,SYSOP:...
Maybe just a separate list with host coordinates (for zxnet mail only
for regular letters) at least news here?
With best wishes, Vladimir.
Hello, Vladimir!
12 May 01 17:18, Vladimir Larkov -> Eugene Palenock:
EP>> it makes sense to introduce a U-flag to indicate an email sysop (by
EP>> IUC because often the robot stands and nails everything on the left
EP>> that’s why Moscow has zxnet95admin@mailru.com). Like
EP>> U,SYS:zxnet95admin@mailru.com or U,SYS:IUC if there is a match.
EP>> Or U,SYSOP:...
VL> Maybe just a separate list with host coordinates (for zxnet mail
VL> only for regular letters) at least here to send messages?
This has already happened. It didn’t work out, because the majority didn’t send anything there, or didn’t
updated. And so, when updating the line, this will not be forgotten.
Best regards, Evgeniy.
Greets to you, Vladimir!
Saturday May 12 2001, 17:18,
Vladimir Larkov (500:812/1@zxnet) wrote to Eugene Palenock
EP>> that’s why Moscow has zxnet95admin@mailru.com). Like
EP>> U,SYS:zxnet95admin@mailru.com or U,SYS:IUC if there is a match.
EP>> Or U,SYSOP:...
VL> Maybe just a separate list with host coordinates (for zxnet mail only
VL> and for regular letters) at least here to lead?
I agree, otherwise there will be confusion.
My best regards!
[2:451/16.71@fidonet] [ICQ:52233362] [op.31-31-32 ab.15842]