zxnet.lst
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»
From Vladimir Larkov → To All 7 May 2001
Hello, everyone!
It seems that I was in a hurry with installing a single segment checker for the entire network,
many (if not all) simply do not need it. Yes, and I have too many adventures
own ass. ;)
Let's do it as before - in each network there is one person (host, nc or
someone else, specially tailored for this) is collecting/checking and
updating your network sheets. Then this person in a way accessible to him
forwards sheets of its network to 812/1. Ideally this would be done fehoy, but
if impossible, attack or use non-soap. Well, then I’m already engaged in assembling common
sheets from network segments. In this case, the sheets, of course, will also be
checked, but a report about ok/problems will not be sent to everyone
node being checked, but to one person on the network issuing network sheets.
The most convenient way is faha, I would like to know if any of the hosts have
non-ideological problems with the spread of fehi by name, for example, subzh? B
common sheets would be hatched from the 812 side, and all networks could be connected to it
Hatch your network sheets. If someone has temporary problems with fehs, then
You can continue to download the general sheet at zxnet.uue
I would really like to hear your opinion. Otherwise, most of the network is just all this
digests in silence.
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From Vladimir Larkov → To Eugene Palenock 12 May 2001
Hello Eugene!
Tue 08-May-2001 10:43, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to me:
VL>> Let's do it as before - in each network there is one person (host, nc
VL>> or someone else specially tailored for this) is engaged
EP> Will we have a flag like NPK for this?
So it seems like he’s been around for a long time.
VL>> forwards the sheets of its network to 812/1 in a way available to it.
VL>> Ideally, this would be done with a fekha, but if this is not possible, attack or
VL>> no soap.
EP> For most, only UUE and soap are realistic. Or he can do it
EP> auto-extracting such UUEs? For example, check with a tracker
EP> to and subj, if the subject contains the UUE command, then upload to a file
EP> and run pktxcode, and it will pull out both UUE and base65...
If you have a tracker (your favorite FTrack, for example), then it’s as easy as shelling pears
move the outbound (the contents of ?lo-shki where needed). Fekhoprots writes in vain,
in the same place where tosser writes bundles. Agree?
VL>> Common sheets would be hatched into it from the 812 side, and
VL>> all networks could put their network sheets into it. EP> I once wanted to do this. But fehs don’t go everywhere.
EP> Is there a way to make a special echo?
So far no one has spoken out in principle against fehi. If anyone has
problems with feja, then for such a person, of course, it’s possible. But, to be honest,
I wouldn’t like it, extra hemorrhage, extra traffic (double coding).
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From Eugene Palenock → To Vladimir Larkov 15 May 2001
Hello, Vladimir!
12 May 01 16:52, Vladimir Larkov -> Eugene Palenock:
EP>> I once wanted to do this. But fehs don’t go everywhere.
EP>> Is there a way to make a special echo?
VL> So far no one has spoken out in principle against the fekha.
VL> I would not like it, an extra hemop,
Why? there are a bunch of posts from the command line, the size is this
that one section is possible. Maybe just something primitive
Use the yuuker to make the text and throw it into the echo with a tracker.
VL> extra traffic (double encoding).
ZIP to UUE = ZIP to UUE to ZIP... I checked it somehow.
Best regards, Evgeniy.
From Vladimir Larkov → To Sergey Zotov 24 May 2001
Hello, Sergey!
Sun 20-May-2001 14:54, you (500:8462/1) wrote a letter to me:
VL>> Personally, when I grabbed from the spectrum, it was just in the ordinary
VL>> iS-EDIT filled the teak, then corrected it as needed
VL>> necessary.
SZ> And in more detail?
Plain text file. For example, you create 12345678.tic in a text editor,
you write in it:
Area areaname
Origin your_addr
From your_addr
Destination aplink_addr
File filename.ext
Replaces filename.old
Desc this is a test file
Seenby your_addr
Pw password
For example, if you want to upload the file 8462ndl.145 to zxnet.lst:
Area ZXNET.LST
Origin 500:8462/1
From 500:8462/1
Destination 500:???/? - who is your uplink?
File 8462ndl.145
Replacements 8462ndl.144
Desc ZxNet Net 8462 host nodelist, day 145
Seenby 500:8462/1
Pw password - what is your password with it?
Then you upload the file itself and this tick uplink and its fahoprots this is the case
digests. That's it, just rejoice.
VL>> So what kind of host is this? Can I talk to him? Why himself
VL>> is silent and hasn’t said a word yet?
SZ> Yes, I said it, I said it. :) You can communicate with me, and it’s better through
SZ> e-mail or fido. It will be faster. By the way, I have a few for you SZ> questions in person.
Ok, let's go to netsoap, if you want Fido, then write to 2:5030/675
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From Sergey Zotov → To Vladimir Larkov 10 June 2001
On Thu 24 May 2001, Vladimir Larkov wrote to Sergey Zotov:
EP>>> Couldn’t it be possible to make an echo? :(
SZ>> Wow! I told you that there is nothing to clear it up with. :(
VL> To whom and where?
Yes, he spoke here in the echo. And, if my memory serves me right, it was you.
SZ>> Some files are just pouring in for me... Along with echoes. Bye
SZ>> did not find them
SZ>> applications, although node-leaf is very useful. :)
VL> Let's start from the other end - not what to rake, but what is it for
Should you use VL>? What are you going to do with the sheets?
Well, I won’t be sitting on Scorp and with Lara forever. :( You can also look at
geography of ZXNet, and contact other nodes for advice on
any technical issues. Again, at some point you will have to change seats.
:/
ZXNet: 500:8462/1 ~/ <~ http://zs80.chat.ru/
Fido: 2:5057/21.93 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/