walking map (visual version)

ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»

From Vladimir Larkov To Wladimir Bulchukey 26 July 2001

Hello, Wladimir! Sun 22-Jul-2001 01:11, you (500:95/462@ZXNet) wrote a letter to me: WB> ├── 500:95/0 aka /462 WB> │ +-- 500:390/0 (former :30932) WB> │ +-- 500:852/0 WB> │ +-- /249 WB> │ +-- /468 WB> │ +-- /452 WB> +-- /100 WB> +-- /1202 WB> +-- /405 I'm very glad that you showed up! Please answer netsoap. Taking into account these (yours and EP's) additions it turned out: ║ 500:95/0 ─────────────┬── /462 │ │ └── /249 │ └── /468 │ ├── /452 │ └── /100 │ ├── /405 │ └── /1202 ├── 500:390/0 ────── /1 │ └── 500:852/0 ────── /1 The same question as for Zhenya - /405 vs /341 - so which one of them really is? In general, I would like to finally get a host nodelist 95, and a real one. Not I'm a fortune teller. Regarding 390 - I took the sheets that you sent (from 30932), point sheetnormal (unless, of course, it has lost its freshness this month), wanted it, but nodelist bedovy - unpublished host, unpublished non-PVT node. So let it be 390 will choose - either the host has a bunch of zeros, like, for example, 232 and PVT on the node or real number. I personally don’t understand why he hides his number if fidosh nodelist: ,15,Cyberdyn_Systems,Chernogorsk,Dmitry_Kuryachij,7-390-31-20378,9600,V32,V42B, #20,MO,LO,U,TMW but the choice, naturally, is his. With best wishes, Vladimir.