walking map (visual version)
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»
From Vladimir Larkov → To Wladimir Bulchukey 26 July 2001
Hello, Wladimir!
Sun 22-Jul-2001 01:11, you (500:95/462@ZXNet) wrote a letter to me:
WB> ├── 500:95/0 aka /462
WB> │ +-- 500:390/0 (former :30932)
WB> │ +-- 500:852/0
WB> │ +-- /249
WB> │ +-- /468
WB> │ +-- /452
WB> +-- /100
WB> +-- /1202
WB> +-- /405
I'm very glad that you showed up! Please answer netsoap.
Taking into account these (yours and EP's) additions it turned out:
║
500:95/0 ─────────────┬── /462
│ │ └── /249
│ └── /468
│ ├── /452
│ └── /100
│ ├── /405
│ └── /1202
├── 500:390/0 ────── /1
│
└── 500:852/0 ────── /1
The same question as for Zhenya - /405 vs /341 - so which one of them really is?
In general, I would like to finally get a host nodelist 95, and a real one. Not
I'm a fortune teller.
Regarding 390 - I took the sheets that you sent (from 30932), point sheetnormal (unless, of course, it has lost its freshness this month), wanted it, but
nodelist bedovy - unpublished host, unpublished non-PVT node. So let it be 390
will choose - either the host has a bunch of zeros, like, for example, 232 and PVT on the node or
real number. I personally don’t understand why he hides his number if
fidosh nodelist:
,15,Cyberdyn_Systems,Chernogorsk,Dmitry_Kuryachij,7-390-31-20378,9600,V32,V42B,
#20,MO,LO,U,TMW
but the choice, naturally, is his.
With best wishes, Vladimir.