Test for 500:39032/0

Excuse me... That is, sorry already, Eugene...! 02 Jun 01 00:44, Eugene Palenock -> Wladimir Bulchukey: EP> He would at least read the basic FTS before the FTN network EP> climb... Zone, network, node and point numbers cannot be higher EP> 32767, and less than 1 for zone and network. I suspect that he is familiar with these documents, having a node in Fido. === Cut === ─ ZXNet Headquarters (500:95/462) ───────────────────────────────────── ZXNET.GENERAL ─ Np/p: 94 out of 94 From: Eugene Palenock 2:5020/2065 25 May 01 20:06:03 To: All 27 May 01 01:14:22 Subject: [FWD] ─────────────────── ──────────────────── ──────────────────── ──────────────────── ============================================================================== * Forwarded by Eugene Palenock (500:95/468) * Region : NETMAIL (FastEcho Netmail) * From: Dmitry Kuryachij, 2:5007/15@fidonet.org (25 May 01 18:50) *To: Eugene Palenock, 2:5020/2065 * Subject : ============================================================================== @INTL 2:5020/2065 2:5007/15 @MSGID: 2:5007/15@fidonet.org 3b0ec9c8 @FLAGS: PVT TRN K/S @RFC-MBOX-Line: From f15.n5007.z2.fidonet.org!Dmitry_Kuryachij Fri May 25 18:50:02 2001 @RFC-X-Original-Date: 25 May 01 21:06:57 Hello, Eugene?I am asking for the allocation of a node address in the ZXnet network and a link with using the internet as transport. Address:500:39032/0 aka 500:39032/1 Name:Dmitry Kuryachij Station:Cyberdyn System Location: Chernogorsk, Russia Voice phone: (39032) 20378 Passvord: whichever one you can think of Mailer: Binkd, T-Mail.OS/2 There won't be a BBS yet. Unfortunately, I don’t know what flags to set for the IP mailer. There will be 2 more points Dmitry (loser) @Via 2:5007/15@fidonet.org @20010525.222214.UTC+0 T-Mail 2607.OS2 @Via 2:5007/7@fidonet @20010525.182733.UTC+4 T-Mail 2607.OS2 0561 @Via Squish/386 1.11 2:5007/1, Sat May 26 2001 at 02:35 UTC @Via 2:5020/52 @20010525.144609.UTC FTrack 3.01/FBSD @Via 2:5020/1229@fidonet, Fri May 25 2001 at 18:50 ifmail (2.14.os-p7-tma) @Via 2:5020/2065 @20010525.160335.UTC FTrack 3.02/W32 ================================================================================ Hello All! Someone write to him... Best regards, Evgeniy. === Cut === What stopped you from answering his first letter before the forward in the echo or, at worst, within a week after? It turns out, “Answer, someone, and I’ll already slam your face on the table.” IT SMELLS REALLY BAD. And then, === Cut === ─ ZXNet Headquarters (500:95/462) ───────────────────────────────────── ZXNET.GENERAL ─Np/p: 29 out of 38 From: PntFix 500:812/1 03 May 01 10:37:42 To: All 05 May 01 14:21:57 Topic: pointlist ─────────────────── ──────────────────── ──────────────────── ──────────────────── Technical limitations: 1. Glukomanism type Point is not processed - this is a node, therefore a place such information in the _node_list. 2. Segments from zone:net/0 addresses are not processed - this is a service host address and points have no place there. Take a normal non-business address and Drag your players there. If you change the network host, then you yourself will have less hemorrhoids. 3. Node number no more than 999, for our network this is more than enough (at present, at least, no more than 999 addresses were noticed) and bust your ass for possible I won't do fingering. With best wishes, Vladimir. === Cut === - these are all the requirements (by the way, not met on all counts, but everything works). In general, yes. We don't have Fido. Technically, the software allows you to have such settings. According to the ZXNet standard, the region number is telephone city code. Who doesn't like it - let's decide for everyone network in a civilized manner. And I demand that PROVOCATIONS and SUPPORTS stop. With the best - Wlodek. mailto: wlblack@chat.ru http://www.wlodeks.boom.ru [ZX] [Golyanovo] [Radio "Retro" 72.92 MHz]

Hello, Wladimir! Sun 03-Jun-2001 21:43, you (500:95/462@ZXNet) wrote a letter to Eugene Palenock: EP>> Well, let him delete the last digit and that’s it... WB> It’s better to swap 9 and 0. WB> Let it be 30932. Well, this is completely crazy, it no longer resembles a telephone code. I would still I agreed with EP and cut off the last digit. BTW (nodelist): ,15,Cyberdyn_Systems,Chernogorsk,Dmitry_Kuryachij,7-390-31-20378,9600,V32,V42B, #20,MO,LO,U,TMW The rest have 2:5007 and even 7-390-22-NNNNN; I would even castrate this network before three digits, i.e.: 500:390/ With best wishes, Vladimir.

Hello, Wladimir! 06 Jun 01 07:21, Eugene Palenock -> Wladimir Bulchukey: WB>> If you don’t like it, let’s write (you can use blood, that is WB>> including mine (but it will be more expensive :) )) modern network Charter, WB>> to focus not on the weighty forward requests of people WB>> best versed in network technologies, but on the rules. Basic rules: zone:net/node.point@domain - zone - 500 - net - from 1 to 32767 - node - from 1 to 32767 (0 - only service address (host) and no points) - point - from 0 to 32767 - domain - @ZXNet It’s still not bad if, without taking into account the domain and taking into account the delimiters, it all fits into 15 characters. This is not necessary, just a displayed string in some software will be cut off. The restrictions on 32767 are due to the fact that otherwise it turns out to be a negative number. at the end of the message there should be a hit line (---) before the origin, after which it is usually the name of the editor is written. Or something else is written, but it’s a sign of a tirline should be. Origin ( * Origin: n (zone:net/node.point)) should be immediately after the target line, and this should be the last line. The origin must contain the sender's address, The domain is not written in the origin. In the world n is the name of the organization where he works person, but in Russia usually just some nonsense fits in. TotalThe length of the origin line cannot exceed 78 characters. In the context of ZXNet It is recommended not to exceed 63 characters, but this does not interfere with ZX software. You can use English letters, numbers, and !"#$%&'()+-;=@[]^`{|}~. The length of the subject field, from, to whom is also limited. I don’t remember exactly, but for now it’s possible conditionally consider 70, 35 and 35 respectively. In the from and to fields you can use English letters, numbers, and !"#$%&'()+-;=@[]^`{|}~. If you really want to use Russian letters, then It's better to write them in ". For the subject, the same restrictions are desirable, but conflicting due to their violation software - no. At the beginning of the message, it is desirable to have an encoding kludge - "^aCHRS: page level" level - almost always 2, page - CP866, CP1125, CP1251, KOI8-R, KOI8-U, etc. But different fido_7, alt, ukr, win are very undesirable. You can read the remaining several hundred rules in ftsc (ftp.ftsc.org) Best regards, Evgeniy.

Hello, Wladimir! Tue 05-Jun-2001 23:01, you (500:95/462@ZXNet) wrote a letter to me: WB>>> Let it be 30932. VL>> I would even castrate this network to three digits, i.e.: 500:390/ WB> I'll have to ask you the same thing as EP: WB> could this issue be resolved from May 25? Don't get me wrong - I don't read minds, how could I know that you were into this rake? will you step on? Or rather, that it is you who will agree to take over this network and that it is you don't you notice the number is too big? I would have told you earlier, but it wasn’t clear who exactly and what exactly ;) WB> I won’t change anything else, the software swallows the settings - WB> and okay. If you don’t like it, let’s write (you can use blood, that is WB> including mine (but it will be more expensive :) )) modern Charter of the network, WB> to focus not on the weighty forward requests of people WB> best versed in network technologies, but on the rules. We’ve been going for so many years... Although in fact the network is FTN’s, so it’s necessary focus on existing technical standards. I mean, such things available without their own charter. With best wishes, Vladimir.

Hello, Vladimir! 06 Jun 01 13:16, Vladimir Klymus -> Eugene Palenock: EP>> I know FTN technologies better. VK> If I were you, I wouldn’t allow myself to make such statements. Probably... VK> But still we need ZC... Well, organize elections... I propose 812/1... Best regards, Evgeniy.