From
Artem O. Kozakov
→
To
Eugene Palenock
30 May 2000
Greetings, Eugene!
May 30, 2000 (it was 15:47 then)
Eugene Palenock in his letter to Sergey Zotov wrote:
EP> If the problem is routing glitches. Config 95/100 is different from
EP> reality. Wait another 3-4 days. So far, up to 812, for example, there is no soap
EP> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email...
at 812/* soap and everything else goes through me.
Best regards, Artem
From
Vladimir Larkov
→
To
Eugene Palenock
1 June 2000
Hello Eugene!
Thu 01-Jun-2000 08:44, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to Sergey Zotov:
EP> For example, my soap for St. Petersburg is still delayed (until they _are_
EP> they won’t tell me specifically where it should be routed).
I answered you in detail at your fidish address. Your FTrack reported that the letter
received:
From : FTrack 2:5020/2065 Tue 30-May-2000 23:22
To : Vladimir Larkov 2:5030/675 Wed 31-May-2000 07:50
Hurry up and turn on me, otherwise I’m tired of sitting without mail for a month...
EP> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - that’s bad...
It's a matter of taste. Some people like passwords in packages, others don't.
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From
Sergey Zotov
→
To
Artem O. Kozakov
1 June 2000
On Tue May 30, 2000, Artem O. Kozakov wrote:
AOK> May 30, 2000 (it was 15:47 then)
AOK> Eugene Palenock in his letter to Sergey Zotov wrote:
EP>> If the problem is routing glitches. Config 95/100
EP>>different from
EP>> reality. Wait another 3-4 days. So far up to 812 for example
EP>> soap
EP>>not
EP>> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email...
AOK> on 812/* soap and everything else goes through me.
And how can I write through you?
E-mail: zs80@ssu.samara.ru ~/ <~ http://www.zx.ru/zs/
ZXNet: 500:8462/1 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/
way. (500:8462/1)
From
Sergey Zotov
→
To
Eugene Palenock
1 June 2000
On Thu 1 Jun 2000, Eugene Palenock wrote:
EP> 30 May 00 21:54, Sergey Zotov -> Eugene Palenock:
SZ>> @MSGID: 500:8462/1 0103ee5e
[Killed.]
SZ>> On Tue May 30, 2000, Eugene Palenock wrote:
EP> Now there were two identical packages from you. The only differences are
EP> that the packet headers are one with 8462/1, and the other with 8462/0.
EP> Why are packets coming at me from /1, I don’t understand something...
Who am I? I am exactly /1! I have no idea who I should be. Actually
Should we actually /1 and pack the packets under /0? If so, how? I don't have any tossers
I use it. It turned out to be impossible to find them under UNIX. I myself will only write something like this
after June 13 (when the session ends), but for now I will mainly be in Read Only.
SZ>>>> I don’t understand what happened, but! nothing from me to the recipients
SZ>>>> not
SZ>>>> it’s coming! Either I made a mistake, or the zone seems like a dick to me.
SZ>>>> :(
EP> Depending on which recipients. For example, I have soap for Peter
EP> is delayed for now (until they _themse_ specifically tell me
EP> where it should be routed).
And they are exactly what I need most. And Ekaterinburg (3432) means for lettersdoesn’t answer, because they can be seen clearly.
EP> Write me a test using soap and report it in the echo.
From what address?
SZ>>>> Everything comes at me, even what I don’t subscribe to! :E
SZ>>>> Nonsense!
EP> What's this like?! All the echoes of ZXNet are coming at you.
EP> For example, what are you not subscribed to?
ZXNET.PC
SPBZXNET.DRINK
ZXNET.BOOKS
I unsubscribed from them!
EP>>> Is the soap not flowing or what?
SZ>> It simply doesn’t exist! 8() They write him, and then he’s gone!
EP> I don’t understand... Who writes to whom? Are you ?
I'm writing. But they don’t receive them. I contacted via FIDO.
EP> Have you looked at the contents of the output package? There it is
EP> present ?
I consider myself an enlightened person in networks. Otherwise the servers wouldn’t trust me
administer.
EP>>> Only L???????.pkt come from you, I already forgot - them
EP>>>LC
SZ>> They are created by Lara Croft 4.50 (currently). :)
EP> So you write a letter to LC and it is not sent?
Packages are received. The network itself does not work. And where do they go after being sent to
zxnet95@mail.ru is not clear. But what should you expect from mail.ru?
EP> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - thisEP> bad...
I believe that you shouldn’t throw passwords around. Passwords are accepted all over the world
don’t even write them down on paper, but here I have to put them in each package in plain text
poke. Maybe I don’t understand something, but experience tells me so.
EP> LC can install it - see the config.
I remember him vividly. :>
P.S. Now packets will fly to /1 and /0 again. If you only need /0, tell me right away.
I will then have to change PKT +#00,#01 to #00,#00. But Lara can’t do that. She
He makes packages aka, and not from a fool. If I'm wrong, correct me and enlighten me.
E-mail: zs80@ssu.samara.ru ~/ <~ http://www.zx.ru/zs/
ZXNet: 500:8462/1 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/
From
Eugene Palenock
→
To
Sergey Zotov
3 June 2000
Hello Sergey!
01 Jun 00 20:23, Sergey Zotov -> Eugene Palenock:
SZ> Who am I? I am exactly /1! I have no idea who I should be. Ha
SZ> actually /1 and pack packages under /0? If so, how? I am nothing
Go to /1. Only if the host in your region changes, you will be his /1
transmit...
EP>> Write me a test with soap and report it in the echo.
SZ> From what address?
/1
SZ> I unsubscribed from them!
Well, it was 95/100...
EP>>>> Only L???????.pkt come from you, I already forgot - them
EP>>>>LC
SZ>>> They are created by Lara Croft 4.50 (currently). :)
By the way, about this:
Error: Unable to read signature from PKT 'd:modemftnfilesinL0009122.PKT'
True, he only wrote an error on one of the four... It was probably a copy from
another aka...
EP>> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - this
EP>> bad...
SZ> I think that you shouldn’t waste your passwords.
Well, how can you confirm the fact that the package is from your address?
SZ> All over the world it is customary not to even write down passwords on paper
This is not the case with FTN technologies. SZ> and here I have to put them in each package in plain text. Maybe I
SZ> which I don’t understand, but experience tells me so.
You have no experience with Fido. Absolutely. Perhaps at the level of a beginner point.
Best regards, Evgeniy.
From
Artem O. Kozakov
→
To
Sergey Zotov
5 June 2000
Greetings, Sergey!
June 01, 2000 (and it was 20:20 then)
Sergey Zotov in his letter to Artem O. Kozakov wrote:
EP>>> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email...
AOK>> on 812/* soap and everything else goes through me.
SZ> And how can I write through you?
and look at the e-mail in the tireline. All packages are accepted on it, if you want, write.
Best regards, Artem
From
Sergey Zotov
→
To
Eugene Palenock
5 June 2000
On 3 Jun 2000, Eugene Palenock wrote:
EP> 01 Jun 00 20:23, Sergey Zotov -> Eugene Palenock:
SZ>> Who am I? I am exactly /1! I have no idea who
SZ>> I should be. Actually /1 and packages should be packed under /0?
SZ>> If so, how? I am nothing
EP> Go to /1. Only if the host in your region changes
EP> - you will give him /1...
??? What host? Who will take care of this for me? :(((
EP>>> Write me a test with soap and report it in the echo.
SZ>> From what address?
EP> /1
Okie. But everything seems to be going well, since I receive .netmail from you.
SZ>> I unsubscribed from them!
EP> Well, it was 95/100...
Well then, I’ll write back now. :)
EP>>>>> Only L???????.pkt come from you, I already forgot - them
EP>>>>>LC
SZ>>>> They are created by Lara Croft 4.50 (currently). :)
EP> By the way, about this:
EP> Error: Unable to read signature from PKT
EP> 'd:modemftnfilesinL0009122.PKT'
EP> True, he only wrote an error on one of the four...EP> It was probably a copy from another aka...
Nope. I remember exactly that these were originals with /1. Doubles with /0 were L*23.PKT and
L*24.PKT
EP>>> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - this
EP>>> bad...
SZ>> I think that you shouldn’t waste your passwords.
EP> Well, how to confirm the fact that the package is from your address
EP> ?
Based on email headers. There samara.ru should be the starting point. :)
More precisely info.ssu.samara.ru :) Strangers cannot send from it.
SZ>> All over the world it is customary not to even write down passwords on paper
EP> There is no such thing in FTN technologies.
I noticed this. :)
SZ>> and here I have to put them in each package in plain text.
SZ>> Maybe I don’t understand something, but this is my experience
SZ>> prompts.
EP> You have no experience with Fido. Absolutely. Only at the level
EP> of the starting point.
No. :( But I have experience in relcom networks, modemless. I think soon I will comprehend everything
wisdom of FTN networks too. :)
E-mail: zs80@ssu.samara.ru ~/ <~ http://www.zx.ru/zs/
ZXNet: 500:8462/1 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/
From
Eugene Palenock
→
To
Artem O. Kozakov
7 June 2000
Hello Artem!
05 Jun 00 12:56, Artem O. Kozakov -> Sergey Zotov:
EP>>>> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email...
AOK>>> on 812/* soap and everything else goes through me.
SZ>> And how can I write through you?
AK> look at the e-mail in the threadline. all packages are accepted on it, if you want
AK> - write.
So my soap goes on them...
Best regards, Evgeniy.