Samara

ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»

From Artem O. Kozakov To Eugene Palenock 30 May 2000

Greetings, Eugene! May 30, 2000 (it was 15:47 then) Eugene Palenock in his letter to Sergey Zotov wrote: EP> If the problem is routing glitches. Config 95/100 is different from EP> reality. Wait another 3-4 days. So far, up to 812, for example, there is no soap EP> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email... at 812/* soap and everything else goes through me. Best regards, Artem

From Vladimir Larkov To Eugene Palenock 1 June 2000

Hello Eugene! Thu 01-Jun-2000 08:44, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to Sergey Zotov: EP> For example, my soap for St. Petersburg is still delayed (until they _are_ EP> they won’t tell me specifically where it should be routed). I answered you in detail at your fidish address. Your FTrack reported that the letter received: From : FTrack 2:5020/2065 Tue 30-May-2000 23:22 To : Vladimir Larkov 2:5030/675 Wed 31-May-2000 07:50 Hurry up and turn on me, otherwise I’m tired of sitting without mail for a month... EP> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - that’s bad... It's a matter of taste. Some people like passwords in packages, others don't. With best wishes, Vladimir.

From Sergey Zotov To Artem O. Kozakov 1 June 2000

On Tue May 30, 2000, Artem O. Kozakov wrote: AOK> May 30, 2000 (it was 15:47 then) AOK> Eugene Palenock in his letter to Sergey Zotov wrote: EP>> If the problem is routing glitches. Config 95/100 EP>>different from EP>> reality. Wait another 3-4 days. So far up to 812 for example EP>> soap EP>>not EP>> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email... AOK> on 812/* soap and everything else goes through me. And how can I write through you? E-mail: zs80@ssu.samara.ru ~/ <~ http://www.zx.ru/zs/ ZXNet: 500:8462/1 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/ way. (500:8462/1)

From Sergey Zotov To Eugene Palenock 1 June 2000

On Thu 1 Jun 2000, Eugene Palenock wrote: EP> 30 May 00 21:54, Sergey Zotov -> Eugene Palenock: SZ>> @MSGID: 500:8462/1 0103ee5e [Killed.] SZ>> On Tue May 30, 2000, Eugene Palenock wrote: EP> Now there were two identical packages from you. The only differences are EP> that the packet headers are one with 8462/1, and the other with 8462/0. EP> Why are packets coming at me from /1, I don’t understand something... Who am I? I am exactly /1! I have no idea who I should be. Actually Should we actually /1 and pack the packets under /0? If so, how? I don't have any tossers I use it. It turned out to be impossible to find them under UNIX. I myself will only write something like this after June 13 (when the session ends), but for now I will mainly be in Read Only. SZ>>>> I don’t understand what happened, but! nothing from me to the recipients SZ>>>> not SZ>>>> it’s coming! Either I made a mistake, or the zone seems like a dick to me. SZ>>>> :( EP> Depending on which recipients. For example, I have soap for Peter EP> is delayed for now (until they _themse_ specifically tell me EP> where it should be routed). And they are exactly what I need most. And Ekaterinburg (3432) means for lettersdoesn’t answer, because they can be seen clearly. EP> Write me a test using soap and report it in the echo. From what address? SZ>>>> Everything comes at me, even what I don’t subscribe to! :E SZ>>>> Nonsense! EP> What's this like?! All the echoes of ZXNet are coming at you. EP> For example, what are you not subscribed to? ZXNET.PC SPBZXNET.DRINK ZXNET.BOOKS I unsubscribed from them! EP>>> Is the soap not flowing or what? SZ>> It simply doesn’t exist! 8() They write him, and then he’s gone! EP> I don’t understand... Who writes to whom? Are you ? I'm writing. But they don’t receive them. I contacted via FIDO. EP> Have you looked at the contents of the output package? There it is EP> present ? I consider myself an enlightened person in networks. Otherwise the servers wouldn’t trust me administer. EP>>> Only L???????.pkt come from you, I already forgot - them EP>>>LC SZ>> They are created by Lara Croft 4.50 (currently). :) EP> So you write a letter to LC and it is not sent? Packages are received. The network itself does not work. And where do they go after being sent to zxnet95@mail.ru is not clear. But what should you expect from mail.ru? EP> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - thisEP> bad... I believe that you shouldn’t throw passwords around. Passwords are accepted all over the world don’t even write them down on paper, but here I have to put them in each package in plain text poke. Maybe I don’t understand something, but experience tells me so. EP> LC can install it - see the config. I remember him vividly. :> P.S. Now packets will fly to /1 and /0 again. If you only need /0, tell me right away. I will then have to change PKT +#00,#01 to #00,#00. But Lara can’t do that. She He makes packages aka, and not from a fool. If I'm wrong, correct me and enlighten me. E-mail: zs80@ssu.samara.ru ~/ <~ http://www.zx.ru/zs/ ZXNet: 500:8462/1 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/

From Eugene Palenock To Sergey Zotov 3 June 2000

Hello Sergey! 01 Jun 00 20:23, Sergey Zotov -> Eugene Palenock: SZ> Who am I? I am exactly /1! I have no idea who I should be. Ha SZ> actually /1 and pack packages under /0? If so, how? I am nothing Go to /1. Only if the host in your region changes, you will be his /1 transmit... EP>> Write me a test with soap and report it in the echo. SZ> From what address? /1 SZ> I unsubscribed from them! Well, it was 95/100... EP>>>> Only L???????.pkt come from you, I already forgot - them EP>>>>LC SZ>>> They are created by Lara Croft 4.50 (currently). :) By the way, about this: Error: Unable to read signature from PKT 'd:modemftnfilesinL0009122.PKT' True, he only wrote an error on one of the four... It was probably a copy from another aka... EP>> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - this EP>> bad... SZ> I think that you shouldn’t waste your passwords. Well, how can you confirm the fact that the package is from your address? SZ> All over the world it is customary not to even write down passwords on paper This is not the case with FTN technologies. SZ> and here I have to put them in each package in plain text. Maybe I SZ> which I don’t understand, but experience tells me so. You have no experience with Fido. Absolutely. Perhaps at the level of a beginner point. Best regards, Evgeniy.

From Artem O. Kozakov To Sergey Zotov 5 June 2000

Greetings, Sergey! June 01, 2000 (and it was 20:20 then) Sergey Zotov in his letter to Artem O. Kozakov wrote: EP>>> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email... AOK>> on 812/* soap and everything else goes through me. SZ> And how can I write through you? and look at the e-mail in the tireline. All packages are accepted on it, if you want, write. Best regards, Artem

From Sergey Zotov To Eugene Palenock 5 June 2000

On 3 Jun 2000, Eugene Palenock wrote: EP> 01 Jun 00 20:23, Sergey Zotov -> Eugene Palenock: SZ>> Who am I? I am exactly /1! I have no idea who SZ>> I should be. Actually /1 and packages should be packed under /0? SZ>> If so, how? I am nothing EP> Go to /1. Only if the host in your region changes EP> - you will give him /1... ??? What host? Who will take care of this for me? :((( EP>>> Write me a test with soap and report it in the echo. SZ>> From what address? EP> /1 Okie. But everything seems to be going well, since I receive .netmail from you. SZ>> I unsubscribed from them! EP> Well, it was 95/100... Well then, I’ll write back now. :) EP>>>>> Only L???????.pkt come from you, I already forgot - them EP>>>>>LC SZ>>>> They are created by Lara Croft 4.50 (currently). :) EP> By the way, about this: EP> Error: Unable to read signature from PKT EP> 'd:modemftnfilesinL0009122.PKT' EP> True, he only wrote an error on one of the four...EP> It was probably a copy from another aka... Nope. I remember exactly that these were originals with /1. Doubles with /0 were L*23.PKT and L*24.PKT EP>>> PS. By the way, you don’t have a password in the packages - this EP>>> bad... SZ>> I think that you shouldn’t waste your passwords. EP> Well, how to confirm the fact that the package is from your address EP> ? Based on email headers. There samara.ru should be the starting point. :) More precisely info.ssu.samara.ru :) Strangers cannot send from it. SZ>> All over the world it is customary not to even write down passwords on paper EP> There is no such thing in FTN technologies. I noticed this. :) SZ>> and here I have to put them in each package in plain text. SZ>> Maybe I don’t understand something, but this is my experience SZ>> prompts. EP> You have no experience with Fido. Absolutely. Only at the level EP> of the starting point. No. :( But I have experience in relcom networks, modemless. I think soon I will comprehend everything wisdom of FTN networks too. :) E-mail: zs80@ssu.samara.ru ~/ <~ http://www.zx.ru/zs/ ZXNet: 500:8462/1 /_ _> ftp://zx-museum.org.ru/zs/

From Eugene Palenock To Artem O. Kozakov 7 June 2000

Hello Artem! 05 Jun 00 12:56, Artem O. Kozakov -> Sergey Zotov: EP>>>> walks. 3882 for some reason has a non-existent email... AOK>>> on 812/* soap and everything else goes through me. SZ>> And how can I write through you? AK> look at the e-mail in the threadline. all packages are accepted on it, if you want AK> - write. So my soap goes on them... Best regards, Evgeniy.