Nodelist ZXNet
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»
From Vladimir Larkov → To Eudgine Palenock 15 January 2000
Hello Eudgine!
Sun 02-Jan-2000 18:47, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to All:
EP> There is a proposal to adopt the rules of the fidosh nodelist for the subject.
EP> With amendments for real-life fans.
EP> What is everyone thinking about this?
That these rules initially apply to me with amendments for real people ;)
EP> PS. Now we have differences in the combinations of V.* and the interpretation of some
EP> other flags -
Any comments on Net812?
EP> for example, y fidoshnikov MO means that the voice is there
EP> You can't call...
;S MO Node does not accept human callers
All my adult life I believed that this was not about voice calls, but about
calls via terminal; in other words it means no BBS. MailerOnly if
you want. Will you convince me?
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From Vladimir Larkov → To Eudgine Palenock 15 January 2000
Hello Eudgine!
Fri 07-Jan-2000 22:13, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to All:
EP> New rules for creating a nodelist, based on fidosh ones.
EP> Be careful with the V.* flags - for example, H16 includes V42b, and them
EP> joint use - error, V90C and X2C - similarly include
EP> V34, V34+ flag - does not exist. Accordingly, for USR Courier it turns out
EP> just ,
EP> V22,
Oh, what an antiquity... In all of St. Petersburg (Fido) there is not a single node and 1 point with V22...
EP> X2C,V90C,
Explain to me pls why does an ordinary normal person need to specify client flags?
Only for fingers?
EP> V32T,VFC,H16.
In reality, IMHO, for Courier 33600 it makes sense:
H16 - Couriers 16800 call hst, others know that there is V42B:
V32T - RC21600 to call on terba21600, not on hst16800;
V34 - for everyone else.
Maybe VFC still makes sense, although, IMHO, no.
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From Vladimir Larkov → To Eudgine Palenock 18 January 2000
Hello Eudgine!
Mon 17-Jan-2000 13:41, you (500:95/468@ZXNet) wrote a letter to me:
EP>>> X2C,V90C,
VL>> Explain to me pls why an ordinary normal person should indicate
VL>> client flags? Only for fingers?
EP> In Moscow we have about 20 nodes with V90S (which we actually have!!!), we don’t talk about X2S
EP> was interested.
We're not talking about the V90S, but the V90C. Besides, these 20 nodes are clearly not on zxnet, right? Question
remains valid: why do you need the V90C flag? What is the use of zxnet people calling you?
because you have this flag registered?
VL>> Maybe VFC still makes sense, although, IMHO, no.
EP> All fall I had no connection with 95/100 on anything other than VFC...
EP> Even HST above 9600 did not connect. And VFC - 21600, 24000...
So? 95/100 did not and does not have a VFC flag. You clearly forbade the V34.
Do not confuse modem protocols and flags in the nodelist. Model sheet flags are needed for
so that the soaper can choose the most correct one before calling
dialprefix.
V90S makes sense in this regard - I can allow the globally banned V90 (without
it connects faster). Which one should I indicate V90C? You have V90C, I have V90C,
This makes no one feel cold or hot.VFC in combination with V34 Alex also needs a fifth leg like a dog, he has
V34,H16, therefore Courier33600, which means there is VFC.
Objections?
With best wishes, Vladimir.