■ Decoding ZXNET.UUE -> ZXNET.Z64, section # Entire CRC error!

Greetings, O most honorable All! Well, first of all, Happy New Year, century and millennium to everyone! And, secondly, can someone clearly explain to me why when when unlinking archives with nodes and pointlists, the program issues a subject line? Don’t point out the curvature of the software - I get a lot of scams, but subject only happens with ZXNET.Z* -=) Best wishes, Andrew Demyanenko (=- bonifacy@mail.zp.ua ur4qop@qsl.net

Hello Andrew! Tuesday 02 Jan 2001, at 12:15:07, Andrew Demyanenko -> All: AD> Well, first of all, Happy New Year, century and millennium to everyone! AD> And, secondly, can someone explain it to me clearly AD> explain why AD> the program displays when unlinking archives with nodes and pointlists AD> saber AD> line? Do not point out the curvature of the software - Yuyukov comes to me AD> a lot, but the subject only happens with ZXNET.Z* I don’t know about uue sections, but here is the file itself: I have long wanted to tell the authors of this archive that real ZX, pkunzip program, the archive is not unpacked. - "ZIP error" seems to be chattering. For a long time, not for the first time, respectively... Needs fixing ;) Oh! Either my gate was set up incorrectly. Happily. Michael.

Hello Valerij! Wed 03-Jan-2001 18:28, you (500:95/468.2@ZXNet) wrote a letter to Andrew Demyanenko: AD>> And, secondly, can someone clearly explain to me why AD>> when unlinking archives with nodes and pointlists, the program issues a subscript AD>> line? Don’t point out the curvature of the software - I get a lot of scams, but AD>> the subject only happens with ZXNET.Z* VK> Yeah. Me too. Where is the rake? crc64 imho is clearly superfluous. VK> ps By the way, 612 - what kind of city is this? Zaporozhye VK> ps\ We survived. Already in the cities we are getting confused =) Who has the complete thread VK> list? nodelist ;) With best wishes, Vladimir.

Hello Eugene! Friday 05 Jan 2001, at 23:04:01, Eugene Palenock -> Mikhail Zharov: MZ>> I don’t know about uue sections, but here is the file itself: MZ>> I have long wanted to tell the authors of this archive that on MZ>> real ZX, pkunzip program, archive is not unpacked. MZ>> - "ZIP error" seems to be chattering. MZ>> For a long time, not for the first time... MZ>> Needs fixing ;) EP> I just pulled out the last 4 files from the database and them EP> successfully unpacked with Spectrum pkunzip 1.30f. I don’t see any jujuks, files immediately fall on me. Perhaps incorrectly broken files are falling on me... Now I have the file "ZXNET.Z64" at hand. A minute ago I tried to open it with the zx program "pkunzip1.33f" (the program is bug-free) Immediately message: "Error in ZIP" I tried to apply the "Extractor" program to the archive, which contains zip corrector ;) No results. Accordingly, with any other zip archive everything is no problem, The problem is only with zxnet point sheets... Unfortunately, I don’t know where the rake might be, I’ll assume that it came out wrong. Everything works out for me on the uplink. There were no problems with other jujuks ;) Happy. Michael.

Hello, Artem! 06 Jan 01 21:52, Artem O. Kozakov -> Valerij Kozhevnikoff: VK>> ps\ We survived. Already in the cities we are getting confused =) Who has the complete thread VK>> list? AK> except from the node maker :) ······------====== Monitor glass cutter ======------······ Russia, Moscow 500:95 Russia, St. Petersburg 500:812 Russia, Vladivostok 500:4232 Russia, Ekaterinburg 500:3432 Russia, Gornoaltaisk 500:3882 Russia, Cheboksary 500:8352 Belarus, Gomel 500:232 Belarus, Minsk 500:17 Belarus, Brest 500:162 Belarus, Grodno 500:152 Belarus, Rivne 500:3622 Ukraine, Donetsk 500:622 Ukraine, Kharkov 500:572 Ukraine, Lviv 500:322 Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk 500:562 Ukraine, Zaporozhye 500:612 Uzbekistan, Tashkent 500:3712 Russia, Vikhorevka 500:3953 Russia, Kirov 500:8332 Russia, Yoshkar-Ola 500:8362 Russia, Samara 500:8462 Russia, Mozhaisk 500:9638 ······------====== Monitor glass cutter ======------······ _I didn’t screw up anywhere with geography???_ WBR, Jason. [Team Obituary][Team Friday 13th][Team Evil Maniacs][Team Huge Axes]

Hello, Vladimir! 28 Jan 01 13:22, Vladimir Klymus -> Kirill Frolov: VK>>> I don’t understand. What changes? Can you tell my segment from a fake? And VK>>> who is our victim? :) We're actually talking about distribution VK>>> full nodelist. KF>> Well, sabotage is simply possible... VK> It’s been said - it’s not possible. Possible. Theoretically... VK> And why? Can you or EP explain it clearly? Why - I don’t know. But in principle, someone can launch the left nodelist and some time the soap will not pass through those who do the checking. PS. On the topic of Fido. By the way, I analyze the echoes with a tracker before letting the fasteha go. In case there is a point to another address (FE only checks the header package, but doesn’t look at the messages) will write, or so that loops through aka points catch. Best regards, Evgeniy.

Press RESET immediately, Vladimir! 28 Jan 01 13:22, Vladimir Klymus wrote to Kirill Frolov: VK>>> I don’t understand. What changes? Can you distinguish my segment from a fake? VK>>> And who is our victim? :) We're actually talking about distribution VK>>> full nodelist. KF>> Well, sabotage is simply possible... VK> It’s been said - it’s not possible. Possible. Should I demonstrate this to you? If I just put up a fake sheet from my address now, then he’ll probably have it. greater some sysops will be perceived as real. What if I falsify the address again? worse... In addition, don’t forget that if a sheet is falsified, not only the mail stops walk the right ways. Phone numbers are also written down on the sheet. And it will be very bad when the computers of these sysops will start calling anywhere - you can get some number of problems, especially at the autopilot station. VK> And why? Can you or EP explain it clearly? Well, you never know... maybe someone who is stoned will find this idea very interesting... Or maybe the enemies of Spectrum, bad emulators and spies of Bill Gates will decide will destroy... You understand one thing: it’s better to think right away than to grab your head later. Encrypt the same sheetpublic key algorithm doesn’t cost anything now, but then it’s worth trying fake the sheet just won't be there. And in general IMHO from that system when the sheet created by one a person should also leave - he alone will have something go wrong and the whole network will be in down.

Hi Eugene! 6.02.2001 at 08:40 Eugene Palenock wrote to Kirill Frolov: KF>> I don’t know who routes using the nodelist. EP> For example, I add non-existent addresses to the nodelist Do you use a nodelist for hub routing? (Not a host, but a hub) WBR, Vladimir. /_500:322/67@ZXNet_/ /_2:462/167@FidoNet_/ /_rashpil@aport.ru_/ * Crossposted in MAIL.FROM.ME, ZXNET.GENERAL