bidkD

ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»

From Vladimir Larkov To Alexei Bugai 4 July 2000

Hello, Alexey! Mon 26-Jun-2000 21:57, you (500:572/110) wrote a letter to me: VL>> But I don’t remember him responding at least once (I weed about once a VL>> three months, out of principle, purely out of boredom): VL>> - 21 Jun 03:08:54 [2] LOC Olymp, Greece. Second door, ring 2 times. AB> Did you ring the doorbell twice? :))) His bell is broken. AB> P.S. 500:572/1024, 212.1.112.66 04 Jul 03:51:34 [1] BEGIN, binkd/0.9.2 -p D:FIDOBinkDzxnet.cfg 04 Jul 03:51:34 [1] clientmgr started + 04 Jul 03:51:34 [2] call to 500:572/1024@zxnet 04 Jul 03:51:34 [2] trying 212.1.112.66... 04 Jul 03:51:35 [2] connected + 04 Jul 03:51:36 [2] session with relay.spezvuz.kharkov.ua - 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] SYS ==_Fido_Server_of_Spezvuzautomatika_== - 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] ZYZ Kostya_Belous - 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] LOC Kharkov_Ukraine - 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] NDL 115200,TCP,BINKP - 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] TIME 2000/07/04 02:49:58 - 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] VER binkd/0.9.2-D/Linux binkp/1.1 + 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] addr: 2:461/1024@fidonet (n/a or busy) + 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] addr: 500:572/1024@fidonet (n/a or busy) ? 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] no AKAs in common domains or all AKAs are busy + 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] done (to 500:572/1024@zxnet, failed, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] session closed, quitting... ONE: "vepite, gentlemen, @ball and cried, @ball and cried..."(s) With best wishes, Vladimir.

From Vladimir Larkov To Artem O. Kozakov 27 July 2000

Hello, Artem! Tue 04-Jul-2000 09:44, ты (500:562/1) написал(а) письмо мне: VL>> У него звонок сломан. AB>>> P.S. 500:572/1024, 212.1.112.66 VL>> + 04 Jul 03:51:34 [2] call to 500:572/1024@zxnet VL>> 04 Jul 03:51:34 [2] trying 212.1.112.66... VL>> 04 Jul 03:51:35 [2] connected [...] VL>> + 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] addr: 2:461/1024@fidonet (n/a or busy) VL>> + 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] addr: 500:572/1024@fidonet (n/a or busy) VL>> ? 04 Jul 03:51:37 [2] no AKAs in common domains or all AKAs are busy VL>> ЗЫ: "веpите, господа, @бал и плакал, @бал и плакал..."(с) AOK> а теперь мои: AOK> === Цитирую файл Windows Clipboard === AOK> ^ 04-Jul-2000 09:38:03 CONNECT To 212.1.112.66 #60179 AOK> 09:38:33 Session completed successfully Можно и так: 04 Jul 04:37:44 [1] BEGIN, binkd/0.9.2 -p D:FIDOT-MAILBinkDinkd_zx.cfg 04 Jul 04:37:44 [1] clientmgr started + 04 Jul 04:37:44 [2] call to 2:461/1024@fidonet 04 Jul 04:37:44 [2] trying 212.1.112.66... 04 Jul 04:37:45 [2] connected + 04 Jul 04:37:46 [2] session with relay.spezvuz.kharkov.ua - 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] SYS ==_Fido_Server_of_Spezvuzautomatika_== - 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] ZYZ Kostya_Belous - 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] LOC Kharkov_Ukraine - 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] NDL 115200,TCP,BINKP - 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] TIME 2000/07/04 03:36:08 - 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] VER binkd/0.9.2-D/Linux binkp/1.1 + 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] addr: 2:461/1024@fidonet + 04 Jul 04:37:47 [2] addr: 500:572/1024@fidonet - 04 Jul 04:37:48 [2] sending D:FIDOFILESoutbound1CD0400.DUT as 396173a2.pkt (389) - 04 Jul 04:37:48 [2] sending D:FIDOFILESoutbound.1f423c0400.dut as 3961485a.pkt (395) + 04 Jul 04:37:50 [2] sent: D:FIDOFILESoutbound1CD0400.DUT (389, 194.50 CPS, 2:461/1024@fidonet) + 04 Jul 04:37:50 [2] sent: D:FIDOFILESoutbound.1f423c0400.dut (395, 197.50 CPS, 2:461/1024@fidonet) + 04 Jul 04:37:51 [2] done (to 2:461/1024@fidonet, OK, S/R: 2/0 (784/0 bytes)) 04 Jul 04:37:51 [2] session closed, quitting... Hо это же несексуально ;) Hа самом деле неясно нужно ли это... большая часть линков емыльная, вот если бы была увеpенность в том, что этот не упадет/не пpопадет, то имело бы смысл всем на бинкд и под него, а так... имхо... With best wishes, Vladimir.

From Artem O. Kozakov To Vladimir Larkov 28 July 2000

Greetings, Vladimir! July 27, 2000 (it was 19:27 then) Vladimir Larkov in his letter to Artem O. Kozakov wrote: VL> But this is not sexy ;) :) VL> In fact, it is unclear whether this is necessary... most of the links are soap VL> if only there was confidence that this one would not fall/disappear, then VL> would make sense for everyone on binkd and under it, otherwise... IMHO... As far as I understand, this is a fairly old node (or not?) Maybe it will be stable? you need to try to persuade one hub in your network to take aka ZXNet - very stable node, I don’t remember a single time that it crashed without warning :) Best regards, Artem