about Brotherly announcement :)
ZXNet echo conference «zxnet.general»
From Eugene Palenock → To Vladimir Klymus 26 June 2000
Hello, Vladimir!
23 Jun 00 22:33, Vladimir Klymus -> Eugene Palenock:
EP>> At least they sent an approximate line to the nodelist...
VK> How many times do I need to explain this? If the NC network is unable to form
VK> network segment and send it direct or via routing, which means the entire network
VK> is non-functional. And to demand a network segment from a network uplink - in general
VK> nonsense. Hint: read fakie and sysop echoes.
Are you a self-proclaimed Z500C? What does this have to do with you?
PS. And I need a line so that the soap does not get stuck for such a network.
Best regards, Evgeniy.
From Eugene Palenock → To Vladimir Klymus 30 June 2000
Hello, Vladimir!
27 Jun 00 19:50, Vladimir Klymus -> Eugene Palenock:
EP>> PS. And I need a line so that the soap does not get stuck for such a network.
VK> If the network is non-functional, then why does it need no soap? If NC doesn't want
VK> make an effort, then why produce dummies for whom the uncle does everything?
VK> A network is formed when it (or rather its host) appears in
VK> nodelist.
With such a policy, there will be three times fewer nodes in ZXNet...
Best regards, Evgeniy.