How many colors does Speccy have?
ZXNet echo conference «zx.grafix»
From Konstantin Sviridov → To All 30 July 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> Any TV broadcaster knows the essence of the nature of this “mysterious” border, and she
Bla> is not what was intended here in numerous versions. Essence
Bla> this phenomenon is that in bad CRT monitors with a simplified
Bla> design (especially TV) with increasing brightness of the point illumination
Bla> raster...
Apparently should also know that defocusing when changing
brightness is not related to the "spreading of electrons" (remember what a "mask" is and
why is she). Changing the brightness of the image changes the current at the second anode
kinescope, and since the voltage on the focusing electrode is formed by the same
circuit (transformer and multiplier), it also changes when changing
brightness We turned up the brightness and the focus floated. And on old TVs, where
horizontal scanning signals were generated in the same block, and also the size
The image changed when the screen brightness changed. But in a particular case, speech
goes IMHO about the dynamic effect:
mor> in the first picture there are 2 familiar places: blue and red.
mor> in the second picture there are the same 2 familiar places, but in reverse: red and blue.
mor> and if you switch these images in software, the border will be visiblemor> between two familiar places.
mor> It’s not even necessary to paint familiar places, you can take 2 pixels.
mor> the colors as a result seem to be the same, but they differ in perception
mor> they do, and I think I even saw it used in some demo
mor> of this defect.
Bla> Since this has nothing to do with the spec's circuitry, then
Bla> somehow taking this effect into account in emulators is pointless.
It may be pointless to take into account, but the effect may have on the Speccy circuitry
direct relation: on the same monitors (or TVs) for different clones
stripes could appear or be absent at the border of familiar areas.
From Valery Tkachuck → To All 30 July 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Con> But in this particular case we are talking IMHO about the dynamic effect
Well, that's what we're talking about.
Bla> is similar to defocusing, but dynamic and not static
Con> remember what is and why it is
This is true for monitors with good circuitry.
Con> on the same monitors (or TVs) different clones could
Con> stripes appear or are absent on the border of familiar spaces
In the absence of uniformity in the mixer circuit and signal levels - nothing
surprising, it could have been worse - some have generally increased brightness
didn't happen. What can I say? - they sculpted as best they could. At least that's not a reason
to collect glitches in emuls. This effect is one of crookedness
mixer + curvature of the TV video input (which in most cases is done by poking
a hot object and was very dependent on the curvature of the hands) + the crookedness of the circuitry and
settings of the TV itself. Anyway, rely on this as a possible free
video effect - not worth it - this is the essence of the post, and not a discussion of circuit design
untuned TVs.
From Kirill Frolov → To All 31 July 2006
Hello Conan
Con> Stupid question? Then which of the following options is the most
Con> exact definition:
Con>
Con>
Con> * 16 colors
Con> * 15 colors
Con> * 8 colors and two brightness levels
Con> * 7 colors and two gradations of brightness plus black
Con>
Con>
Con> Can multicolors, for example, be considered additional colors?
Con> Hardware and (or) software?
All options are stupid. It is necessary to take the number of combinations in a familiar place, taking into account
"two-color" pictures. Obviously, in a static image there are 15
distinguishable colors. Key word DIFFERENTIABLE. So talk about BRIGHT
there's no point. And if I'm not mistaken, it turns out n!/k!(n-k)! colors, where k=2, n=15,
in total there are about a hundred flowers.
From Dmitry Malychev → To All 1 August 2006
Hello Conan
Con> P.S. n!/k!(n-k)! colors, where k=2, n=15, ultimately gives 105. Diver
Con> it turned out to be 102. The numbers don’t clash, who’s right?
102. Calculated by hand for accuracy. :p
From Konstantin Sviridov → To All 1 August 2006
Hello fk0
In chapter seven from the instructions for the branded ZX Spectrum (ZX Spectrum INTRODUCTION)
said:
The ZX Spectrum has eight colors to play with, and these are given numbers
between 0 and 7. Although the colors look in random order, they do in tact
give decreasing shades of gray on a monochrome TV.
Here is a list or them for reference; they are also written over the
appropriate
number keys;
0; black
1 blue
2 red
3 purple or magenta
4 green
5 pale blue or cyan
6 yellow
7 white
is eight colors. The names of the colors are given.
Most domestic clones have hardware support for 15 colors, and
some and 16 were displayed. So it’s not so , about Bright C
similarly.
P.S. n!/k!(n-k)! colors, where k=2, n=15, ultimately gives 105. Diver got 102.
The numbers don't beat, who's right?