Nemo - roxx ;) [2]

* Crossposted in SPBZXNET.GAMES =============================================================================== | Forwarded by Vyacheslav Mednonogov (2:5030/675.30) | Area : ZX.SPECTRUM (Workers of all countries, unite!) | From : Arseniy Astapenko, 2:5015/133.29 (01 Jul 01 11:56) | To: All | Subj: Nemo - roxx ;) =============================================================================== Hello, All! Here's another great excerpt from Sabzhe's memoirs on the topic of copyright :) === I quote the file NEMO130.TXT === About a year ago I heard from Spectrum users (or rather Scor- pions, - Zonov NEVER USED Spectrum logo, - so it’s more correct call it that. They knew WHAT they were buying) that Zonov RESUME production. On sa- In my case, an attempt was made to REVIEW the operation of the fly separation mechanism from cutlets under the motto: “Zones will be produced for you” leads, will catch up and will do it again." Thank God, there are fewer fools. And in general Now, does it make sense to use the word "manufacturer" to a person that I DO NOT COMPLY with DOES IT GIVE copyright to software? Once we spoke on this topic with Cond- Ratyev. That's what he said: "That's right EVERYONE steals." What can you answer? Well, first of all, not everything. In Spectrum Copyright is respected in 5 - 10% cases, while in the RS - only 2 - 5% of cases (and even then by government agencies, -facts that any of the individuals paid for the software, I don’t know). This VERY STRONG. THIS IS A FUNDAMENTAL ADVANTAGE LIFE IS TWICE! These are not some fucking things megahertz, - this is the mentality, this is on at the level of mass consciousness, i.e. himself complex things that computer scientists deal with. And who pays the money? Beggars - and this is fast It’s not money, but tears, and not some government offices that sit side by side on government budget oil pipe and are considering computers as a good way to budget theft. I think that few will understand what does this mean? Secondly, what kind of production is this? a body who chops his own bitch, on which sits upside down? Those. consciously, methodically and systematically destroys its own market? Machines are useful after all. exactly as much as there is software - and he steals it, violating copyright, i.e. destroys software companies. Yes he should blow the dust off them, and not engage in greed. Any undertaking He knows that money can work like this anywhere, anywhere and in what way So, - the only thing that cannot be allowed - this is so that your money works for- tive of your own money. And here it’s not just not- Please note, there is a system here. Where are the logs? what? And the logic is simple. Money can bring raising money not only as a result of creative Denmark, but also as a result of destruction.Money is energy, and it is released both in creation and in destruction. Moreover, when money is destroyed, it is allocated more, and put them in your pocket about more Breaking is not building, in order to to lay out, not necessarily to invest. The market costs money, having destroyed it - you can get them ALL. This is how Soros acted England. The collapse of any support structure given by the release of energy. First we enter own money - seed (a little bit). Then money sticks to them lamers in an immeasurably greater quantity, then we destroy everything and put ALL the money for ourselves in your pocket. We transfer the money to "reliable" business, for example, in RS-k. The only thing is that sometimes I sleep restlessly. Siysk citizen Zonov, when the shares For some reason High-Tech is starting to fall. And so I have absolutely nightmares when the government. paper The US is starting to rise in price. Hey, this is a word y, although some countries suggest themselves new, vague analogies. Thirdly, why do these ALL steal if Scorpion company controlled from 30 to 50% of all COMMERCIAL software deliveries? The question is by no means absurd. If someone controls 50% of the turnover, then he determines lays down the rules of the game. Those. not so easy distinguish cause from effect. Possible with assert with an equal share of truth that Zonov steals because EVERYONE steals, - as well as vice versa - that EVERYONE steals, becausethat Zonov is stealing. In Soros's memoirs this the dependency looks like this: f = g(s) s = g(f) (1) In fact, this is not mathematics, but mo- fraud. So that it becomes like a ma- subject matter, it is necessary to require g(s (f)) <> id, this is possible if you consider (1)not in IR2, but in IR3, at a minimum by entering, for example, the variable t (time), i.e. ba- zis {s,f,t}, - and any, not necessarily strictly orthogonal and orthonormal, because in any bases expression (graph) will be conformal - the topology is important. Looks like I got pretty distracted, but I think... It was not boring to read. At least it is clear that with the filling of computers the real In other words, not everything is as simple as it seems - at first glance. What are they worth at least? the same "competitors" and "manufacturers", with which one has to deal with, as well as their users. "Peters" from Zonov not- gone far. Maybe a little dumber. ===End quote === 500:95/462.17@ZXNet was with you Ars^FTL mailto:arseniy@pochta.by -+- GoldED/386 3.0.1-asa9.1 + Origin: TIME TO CHOOSE (2:5015/133.29) ===========ReadMeAgain====================================================================== Get Msg, Ally! [I.ZX] [VR1] ----------------------------> Warm greetings, Slava! mailme: copper_feet@mail.ru icq#me: 81191986[We don’t need the Sun - the Party shines for us! We don't need bread - let's work! ]