2CD
ZXNet echo conference «sale.zx»
Hello new art
new> I feel the forum will close up pretty quickly at this rate.
new> Already because of the fidoshniks, it became sickening to go to the forum.
So, “assimilation” is in full swing. :v2_conf2: "Excerpt" from zx.spectrum from
moderator Serge Zhavoronkoff:
"
SZ> I believed and still believe that any gating of fido-conferences goes to
SZ> on a “secondary” basis, that is: they are guests, we are hosts.
SZ> Accordingly
SZ> they must follow our rules, not the other way around. Somehow they must
SZ> adapt to the “fidosh style”, not vice versa.
"
On this basis, I have a question again - who came where?
WBR, Andreas Kaise
Hello, All
Vla> zx trader vBv.
Vla>
Vla> vBv [2CD NZXS v3.15 (09.23.2005)]
I feel like the forum is going to die pretty quickly at this rate.
Already because of the fidoshniks, it became sickening to go to the forum.
WBR, Vyacheslav Kalinin
Hello icebear
Dear Andreas and Vyacheslav, please show your typical tolerance
civilized people. Those whom you call "fidoshniks" are the same people as
you, who only use a different type of connection to communicate. Or do you need it that way
differentiation by ?
In addition, if the answer is not in the topic of the topic, then the forum and any echo
it will really be filthy. To discuss the work of the forum there is
relevant section.
P.S. A question like “Who came where” is worthy of regret, because there is an elementary
concept: PARTNERSHIP. In this case, each other’s interests and wishes are respected, and
problems are solved instead of being savored.
WBR, Conan aka Konstantin Sviridov
Hello Conan
Con> Dear Andreas and Vyacheslav, please be tolerant
Con> characteristic of civilized people. Those whom you call
Con> are people just like you, using only a different type of connection to communicate.
Con> Or do you really need differentiation by ?
What are we talking about, Kostya? I think so, no one particularly attacked the fidoshniks (well, maybe
Newart was in a bad mood, I don’t know). We came across a strange system of merging two into
the principle of incompatible things (well, at least I ran into it and not only in this
topic).
Con> P.S. A question like is worthy of regret, because there is
Con> elementary concept: PARTNERSHIP. In this case, the interests and wishes of each other
Con> a friend is respected, and problems are solved instead of .
Why? I really don't understand why you start blaming me for my
outrage over the moderator policy of zx.spectrum? I think so, the main one
the masses were not particularly keen on the idea of merging with Fido. And then, it’s still impossible to read
completely inconsistent threads. Are you satisfied? I'm not here.
PS: We can move the topic to the flame or to “Our forum”.
WBR, icebear aka Andreas Kaise
Hello icebear
> SZ> I believed and still believe that any gating of fido-conferences goes to
> SZ> on a “secondary” basis, that is: they are guests, we are hosts.
>
In fido we are guests, in form they are guests.
> SZ> Accordingly, they must follow our rules, not vice versa. Somehow
> SZ> should adapt to the “fidosh style”, not vice versa.
Back to clay tablets fido?
Con> because there is an elementary concept: PARTNERSHIP
This all reminds me of a joke: will we share equally or fraternally?
What the hell is this ?
--
IT FOUND A VOICE... NOW IT NEEDS A BODY
WBR, [bETA]mEN aka Jaroslaw Tanuni
Hello, [bETA]mEN
ice> I really don’t understand why you start blaming me for my things
ice> outrage over the policy of the moderator zx.spectrum?
The word “penalize” is not entirely correct in this situation. Rather, I'm just like you
surprised. What policies (that affected you personally) are we talking about? In what and who
did he limit you when gating started?
ice> I think so, the majority were not particularly keen on the idea of merging with Fido.
There was no merger, only the exchange of messages began, this is the goal - to expand
communication opportunities.
ice> And then, it’s still impossible to read completely inconsistent threads.
This is a technical issue, and it must be solved in a very specific manner (if indeed
need a solution).
bET> mEN]This all reminds me of a joke: we will divide equally or by
bET> brotherly? What the hell is this .
Again, name a specific problem (what is bad, what is inconvenient). And do
amendment to grace period.
WBR, Conan aka Konstantin Sviridov
Hello, All
Dan> Slavik, are you a Nazi? =)) We are all spektrumists, don’t take it too seriously
Dan> to the heart :)
My message was actually about the fact that Comrade Bogdanovich is advertising his
discs once a month (if not more often), he has already created one topic.
Why create a second one?
Will there be another topic next time?
WBR, newart aka Vyacheslav Kalinin