What is speccy

ZXNet echo conference «hardware.zx»

From Andrey Romanenko To All 13 November 2006

Hello, Maksagor > You just don’t smell the truth :) in my opinion, after purely drug-addicted conversations about the “chimera” and the “critics” type ATM" is not about anything specific from the side of the "blackened cat" some people start nervous breakdown And people are trying to respond to the drug addicts' nonsense. I wonder what result is expected in response? After my post, I expect that some people will come to their senses and not continue to pollute the forum with garbage.

From ASDT To All 13 November 2006

Hello, CHRV "All domestic clones are hardware emulators" Gee... Ie 2 pcs. TM2 hardware emulator TM8 :) Gee-gee-gee... “The competitor has left the fuck out of the market where there is no money but a lot of balabols!” Allahu Akbar! :) But in fact... usefulness of "xBIOS ROM + VG93 emulator" for everyone: 1) Can this be considered an alternative implementation of trdos, or is it a hack of trdos? 2) Could it become the basis of "ZXfreeDOS/openDOS" 3) Application on other clones and for other “devices”

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 13 November 2006

Hello icebear ice> But now we can wait for ZX<>VGA and Turbo 3? Exactly. Focused development of Turbo 3, top-down compatible, begins with Turbo 2+. Although bare Turbo 2+ boards will still be available for purchase from me, but they will no longer be assembled.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 13 November 2006

Hello fan > and here he didn’t bake at all. And I believed you... This is not about ATM, but about the fact that when there is no certainty, and even more so when there is the desire of individual comrades for certainty to never exist is very easy sell anything under the Speck brand that was not even close to it (this not about ATM). > In my opinion, everything that you wrote in “Chimera”, and where you are from > you make your own secondary conclusions - on your own, an attempt at something > analyze something, interesting and, but essentially - from the point of view > truth is only your subjective point of view Everything related to analytics in the “Chimera” topic - everything has a logically coherent, consistent, interconnected structure. And most importantly - everything is very easy tested in practice, which is a criterion for the scientific nature of any theory. Subjective points of view are the points of view of “so-called opponents”, because there are still no real, substantiated arguments against introduced. Moreover, all arguments against come down to banal insults which is much more consistent with your definition of “stupid criticism.” > In general, I’m just interested in critical reviews about ATM. I talked with CHRV about this topic. His answer is that ATM will not develop anyway the proposed direction. > wait, I’ll answer your megapost If it’s like last time, then don’t, I’m sorry for your wasted time and place in topic. If you want to really understand it, then you need to think, think and think. Unfortunately, few people consider this necessary for themselves - it’s easier to get lost in a cackling herd, as if an increase in the number of ignoramuses could change laws of physics. If you are going to answer, it’s better to do it alone statements - and it won’t take you time, and it’s easier for me to keep the topic on track correcting single deviations from the topic.

From Alexander Zan To All 13 November 2006

Hello icebear ice> But now we can wait for ZX<>VGA and Turbo 3? Now everything is falling into place, all attacks on ATM are just sabotage in order to speed up the release of the VGA converter: v2_devil; :v2_lol:;

From Surfin' Bird To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc OFTOP (kazhytstso): ATM turbo 2+ - ruleszzz!!! All producers of reals are crosafchegi! :v2_clapp:

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc scl> and not “Plato is my friend, but the truth is more precious” case? Exactly!

From Yakovlev Anton To All 14 November 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> "Socrates is my friend, but truth is dearer.." and not “Plato is my friend, but the truth is more precious” by chance?

From Yakovlev Anton To All 14 November 2006

Hello, bigral CHR> The competitor has left the market where there is no money but a lot of balabols! Well, damn, I was left without a New Year's gift to myself... :( :( :(

From Valery Tkachuck To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc scl> and not "plato True :) But the coolest thing is that Plato also turned out to be right in this story :)

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc scl> well, damn it, I was left without a New Year's gift to myself... :( :( scl> :( And you urgently talk to Roman: maybe he’ll collect one scarf for the sake of exception. Them Moreover, there will still be bare boards.

From Victor Ronin To All 14 November 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> No. I would be more pleased if ATM developed as Spec, and not in Bla> side of increasing incompatibility, especially as such development Bla> is possible. Nothing personal - “Socrates is my friend, but truth is more precious..” And who’s stopping you from doing it yourself if you’re so smart :)

From Chunin Roman To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc scl> I will not be able to assemble a normally working one from a bare board and spare parts scl> thing... I've never been particularly friendly with this kind of technology in particular scl> and with the technology of collecting electronic devices in general. scl> I asked the novel about the amount of the collected fee scl> atm + ts + set of loops in light of recent events, but no answer scl> received. :( and the amount is important, because it will determine the time during scl> which I can collect this sum I asked you to wait for an answer, but the amount is known. Unfortunately, I clearly decided not to collect Turbo 2+ boards anymore (except for one order already paid for previously, and a prize for the TI competition). Therefore there are no exceptions there won't be any, please excuse me.

From Yakovlev Anton To All 14 November 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> That's right :) But the coolest thing is that Plato also ended up in this story Bla> is right :) so Aristotle's phrase, reflected in your attitude towards atm, turned out to be less the truthful views of Plato (=Maxagoras). thereby you confirmed that your the views are further from the truth than the views of Maxagor: v2_lol; >; Moreover, there will still be bare boards. I won't be able to assemble a normally working thing from a bare circuit board and spare parts... I I have never been particularly friendly with this type of technology in particular and with the collection technique electronic devices in general. I asked Roman about the amount of the collected fee atm + ts + a set of cables in light of recent events, but did not receive a response. :( and the amount is important, because it will determine the time during which I can collect this amount

From Yakovlev Anton To All 14 November 2006

Hello, CHRV CHR> Therefore, there will be no exceptions, please excuse me. ugh, ugh... :( :( :( :( :( late as always... noon, this Spectrum... noon, that's all... without real life it's boring... there's nothing to create I will... probably

From Vladimir Bovin To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc scl> ugh, blah... :( :( :( :( :( late as always... scl> noon, this Spectrum... noon, that's all... it's boring without real life... creating scl> I won't do anything... probably Boo-ha-ha! I have a similar problem. I sat and soldered and here it was, it seemed! And then Something with the disk drive and everything will collapse. Well, I threw one Speck on the shelf, the second one in cabinet, placed two keyboards on top, which were successfully “separated” from the Spectrum, I think, damn, why do I need Speck, it’s just a mess. Oh, I still can’t put my finger on it, it’s probably a cool computer. I'm making a website regarding Scorp repair. In any case, I will describe step by step what made it myself, prepared a lot of illustrations that need to be systematized and process. The text has been written. I really hope for a response and help from knowledgeable forum members (with site there should be a link to zx.pk.ru in a special section), because the problem Spectrum repair has always existed, right?

From Mark Antonov To All 14 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc ask CFU or someone else to collect pent1024

From Yakovlev Anton To All 16 November 2006

Hello Vovoi no, I just wanted a new reality. the best there is at the moment

From elfh To All 16 November 2006

Hello, scl^mc Let KOE build you pent1024sl v.2, I'll change it to ATM2 if everything is fine will work. Honestly!

From Yakovlev Anton To All 17 November 2006

Hello KingOfEvil Kin> It is possible, but you will have to wait a long time, because there is free time Kin> is missing. While you wait for a long time, anything can happen, even another default.

From Chunin Roman To All 17 November 2006

Hello KingOfEvil Kin> It has a direct "Pentagon" scan... What does not correspond to the television standard cannot be called "straight". No matter how much you want it!

From Valery Tkachuck To All 3 December 2006

Hello Titus Tit> Admirers of software (mainly games and Tit> dem), written for the Spectrum, which has iron (especially some Tit> new) no need :v2_walkm; A; if they make new games with new ZX compatible screens, really will you refuse? :)

From Yakovlev Anton To All 3 December 2006

Hello Titus mor> you need to give a person an engine, let him publish a newspaper. qhts to help :D

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> "Ideologies and concepts in the light of platform development." > In this regard, the naive simplicity and uncriticality of k > ZX-myth-creation of some people, who ardently prove it > the existence of certain achievements in the development of the ZX platform, for example in ATM, > although nothing but miserable attempts to sell opportunistic chimeras into > clones from the subfamilies were not observed. ( > more about subfamilies "...But the diarrhea did not subside, it came out through the ears." (from the children's "darkly humorous" rhyme). And some even have a stake on their head - to no avail. If only they To engage in ZX myth-making, to speculate about all sorts of "business" zimers building" and others. Well, what can we take from the stupid ones? Moderators: it’s high time to move both this thread and the thread with the “chimera” to the flame. Let there, those who want to scratch their tongues do it as they want. It's all the same who's real understands something and actually does something, they left here a long time ago...

From Mark Antonov To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Maksagor > Moderators: it’s high time to move both this thread and the thread with the “chimera” to > flame. Can it be banned immediately?

From Andrey Alexandrovich Titov To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> That is. if desired, the worm at its individual level can Bla> develop into an elephant? :) Okay, let's not argue about abstract topics, huh Bla> then it’s not far from the meaning of life :) . Still a debated question about Bla> ZX, has a narrower specialization than the meaning of life :). At its level, the worm goes through a certain development path, adding grains experience into the global Universal information structure: v2_wink2; What; As for the ZX, it, as a subspecies, has long ago lost almost all positions more progressive currents, and supports its existence from iron only in a narrow circle of amateurs and fans.

From Andrey Alexandrovich Titov To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> The basis of the ideology of the development of all living things - growth and reproduction, or what Bla> consumption of certain foods is mutually reversible. This is more like the ideology of a cancer cell or virus: v2_jawdr; Main; the ideology of all living things is development, both at the individual level, and at the global, universal level.

From Andrey Alexandrovich Titov To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> These are the ones who have gathered here, so we can conditionally assume that Bla> here is a microverse with a single computer platform - ZX :). And also fans of software (mainly games and demos) gathered here, written for the Spectrum, which doesn’t care about hardware (especially any new one) need :v2_walkm:

From moroz1999 To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Maksagor You need to give a person an engine, let him publish a newspaper.

From moroz1999 To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> The goal is to figure out what can be called Spectrum, where is the line, crossing Bla> which Spectrum ceases to be such, well, ideally I would like Bla> still figure out how to develop the Spectrum so that it remains at the same time Bla> by yourself. Damn, this is corny. There is no need to complicate everything, let's build a simple logical chain: Spectrum is, first and foremost, written software. The software runs on some machines, and not goes to others. Software is written by people, which means it’s people, guided strictly individual set of considerations determine under what hardware the software will be to go, and under which not. Hence the simple conclusion - everyone has the concept of "Spectrum" absolutely my own, so coming up with multi-page concepts is an idea meaningless. Today's software on the Spectrum is enthusiasm, and only a fool would try force an enthusiast to do something that is not interesting to him. Try to better predict how popular this or that feature will be, and try to derive these “conditions of demand”.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 3 December 2006

Hello, Maksagor > Anyway, everyone who really understands something and really does something > they left here a long time ago... Is the goal of the topic to develop and produce ATM-4? The goal is to figure out what is possible call it a Spectrum, where is the line, after crossing which the Spectrum ceases to be such maybe, well, ideally I would also like to figure out how to develop the Spectrum so that it at the same time he remained himself. In order to understand these issues, it is not you need to delve into the problem to the micro level - under a microscope these questions are like If you can’t decide, you need to distance yourself a little and look from afar - at the macro level. The existence of drawings of the Nazca desert cannot be noticed when looking at them walk, but you can clearly see it from above. The situation is the same in these matters. Therefore, no matter how good a programmer or electronics engineer you are, here it is will not be useful to you and does not play a decisive role, because I have to operate here not microcells or logical elements, but concepts, ideologies and platforms. And if this is not familiar to you, then say that it is not necessary discussing it because you are too lazy to understand it looks very absurd. By and large, the forum is voluntary, if you are lazy, don’t read.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 3 December 2006

Hello, moroz1999 mor> Today's software on the Spectrum is enthusiasm, and only a fool would be mor> try to force an enthusiast to do something that is not interesting to him. And I am of the same opinion :) It is more reasonable to attract enthusiasts with an interesting idea, and not by establishing cane discipline, which is what some are trying to accuse me of :). But in order for an idea to take off, it must first be positioned - so that immediately into the top ten, and not into the “milk”. And for positioning you need to do it right figure it out. mor> Try to better predict how popular this or that will be mor> another feature, and try to derive these “conditions of demand”. :) I'm not an astrologer :) You can only say about features how consistent they are with ZX ideology, everything else depends on those who use these features. G.S. for example, it does not contradict the ZX ideology, but will it become the same standard as I can't say NemoBus.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 3 December 2006

Hello Titus Tit> supports its existence from the iron side only in a narrow circle Tit> lovers and fans. These are the people who have gathered here, so we can roughly assume that here microverse with a single computer platform - ZX :).

From Valery Tkachuck To All 3 December 2006

Hello Titus Tit> The main ideology of all living things is development, as at the level Tit> individual That is If desired, a worm at its individual level can develop into an elephant? :) Okay, let’s not argue about abstract topics, otherwise we won’t get to the meaning of life far away :) . Still, the question under discussion about ZX has a narrower specialization than the meaning of life :) .

From Andrey Alexandrovich Titov To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> That's the point, to create new modes that are easy to use Bla> would be to port the games. It is considered bad form to suggest, for example Bla> refuse TR-DOS, because all software has already been converted for this system Bla> and it took 5 years of work by hundreds, or even thousands of people, but at the same time Bla> time, without hesitation, they easily offer to attach it to Spec Bla> absolutely alien v9990 screen under which anything is generally impossible Bla> convert, but only do it again. The question is, where is the sane Bla> meaning and logic? There is also no particular common sense or logic in converting and porting games. In the case of the Spectrum, this is one of the creative ways self-expression/self-affirmation.

From Andrey Alexandrovich Titov To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> And if they make new games with new ZX compatible screens, really Bla> will you refuse? :) There is only one ZX-compatible screen, a standard one :-) But I won’t refuse, even if the screen is different, but supported in emulators. Only what's the use of making new modes for which, at best, they will write (ah, Most likely, at most they will port) one or two games.

From moroz1999 To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> After all, the final goal is not to be a graphomaniac, but to come to something Bla> conclusions-solutions. to which ones? Is it really not clear to anyone else that Spectrum exists only fans? and the fan will not do “what is correct”, he will do “what is more like it" because he's a fan, not a salesman, that's all. then why do it any conclusions and solutions?

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello, moroz1999 mor> if a person likes the idea of ​​attaching v9990 to Spec, then there is no point mor> dissuade him This is not for fans of v9990, this is for Titus - by type - what a cleverly made screen should make the transition easier, not more difficult. And a newspaper, of course, is a good thing, but a live dialogue is more beneficial. Anyway The ultimate goal is not to be a graph-maniac, but to come to some conclusions and solutions.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello Titus Tit> But what's the use of making new modes for which, at best, Tit> they will write (and, most likely, at most, port) one or two games. That’s the point, to create new modes that would be easy to port games. It is considered bad form, for example, to suggest refusing TR-DOS, because all the software has already been converted to this system, and it took 5 years the work of hundreds, or even thousands of people, but at the same time, nothing doubtful with ease they propose to attach to the Spec a completely alien screen v9990 for which It is impossible to convert something, but only to do it again. The question is where common sense and logic?

From moroz1999 To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> but at the same time, without hesitation, they easily offer to screw it to Bla> I have a completely alien v9990 screen for which it is generally impossible Bla> convert something, but only do it again. The question is where Bla> common sense and logic? Didn't you read my post well? or did I write it poorly? if a person likes the idea of ​​attaching a v9990 to a Spec, then there is no point in it dissuade, because this is the engine of his enthusiasm. better go code :)

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello, moroz1999 mor> and the fan will not do “the right way”, he will do “the right way mor> like it better" There are different fans, some that are “correct” and some that you “like better”, and even those who like to draw conclusions :). mor> then why make any conclusions and decisions? Then why do anything at all - we’ll all die anyway :) .

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello, moroz1999 mor> what is the ultimate goal of your reasoning? Bla> The goal is to figure out what can be called Spectrum, where is the line, crossing Bla> which Spectrum ceases to be such, well, ideally I would like Bla> still figure out how to develop the Spectrum so that it remains at the same time Bla> by yourself. I already wrote :(

From moroz1999 To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Then why do anything at all - we'll all die anyway :). Okay, in short, what is the ultimate goal of your reasoning?

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 4 December 2006

Hello, moroz1999 mor> hmm. OK then. I wish you then successful clarification and, as a consequence mor> fruitful development of the platform :) Yeah, let him figure it out, figure it out and figure it out. And we will be here on the platform develop. Sami. :)

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> :) ATM is not a platform yet, but just a subfamily, but if you Bla> even if you develop it to a new platform, it will no longer be Bla> ZX platform. And I didn’t claim the opposite. Just like the ZX-128 is also not a platform at all, but only a subfamily of Spectrums in general, since there is much more in the world the number of ZX-48s that will not support 128Kb programs. Well, until the new one No one is going to develop the platform (this phrase is generally nonsense). > I have nothing against your creativity I'm glad. > but personally I am more interested in the ZX platform. Me too. And only her.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Maksagor > Just like the ZX-128 is also not a platform at all, but only > subfamily of Spectrums in general, since there is much more in the world > number of ZX-48s that will not support 128Kb programs. ZX48-128 is not two platforms, but one Original ZX platform that we inherited after the death of Sinclair Research Ltd. There are no extensions of the ZX128 relative to the ZX48 bear signs of a new platform, they can only be classified as add-ons over the base platform that are part of this platform. Just like later for the xUSSR ZX platform such add-ons became the TR-DOS disk system and NemoBus. That you don't want to understand the platform hierarchy leads to your disorientation - you just don’t understand how everything relates and so you end up in trouble over and over again. > Well, no one is going to develop to a new platform (this phrase > generally nonsense). Again: ATM already has signs of a new platform - these are its new screens and a memory manager that differs from the standard speed. So There is no nonsense in this, there is your misunderstanding of the situation.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Maksagor > And here we will develop the platform. Yourself. :) ATM is not a platform yet, but just a subfamily, but if you still develop to a new platform, then it will no longer be a ZX platform. Nothing against I don’t have your work, but personally I’m more interested in the ZX platform.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 4 December 2006

Hello Shaos Sha> ZX-128 - development of other people If you still got acquainted with the history of ZX (at least http://zxnext.narod.ru/index.htm ), then I would have known that when selling Sinclair Research Ltd., the rights to both the ZX48 and ZX128 were transferred to the new owner. Why would never have happened if they were not owned by Sinclair Research Ltd. Those. Legally, the ZX128 is a development by Sinclair Research Ltd. Or do you think that Did Sinclair develop computers himself? :) Then you really have something "with the ability to think logically" :) .

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 4 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> ZX48-128 is not two platforms, but one Original ZX platform, Bla> inherited from us after the death of Sinclair Research Ltd. ZX128 extensions Bla> regarding the ZX48 do not bear signs of a new platform, they can be Bla> classify only as add-ons on the base platform Bla> that are part of this platform. ZX-128 - the development of other people (not directly Sinclair Research), more moreover - made in another country (Spain). If switching cans is for you memory, music coprocessor, start menu and new BASIC with letter-by-letter input "do not bear signs of a new platform", then with the ability to logically your thinking is not all right... :rolleyes; By; in my humble opinion, the ZX-128 is no longer a Spectrum, but a dying attempt SinclairResearch using someone else's hands to stay afloat a little longer.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 5 December 2006

Hello, SAM style SAM> was a foreign spec device back then. And then YYT - and took root, became SAM> standard. Where is the fracture? Well, first of all, he was never alien. If you don’t know, NemoBus is a bit modified ZXBus. But there really was a turning point when everyone who wanted connect the HDD began to mount NemoBus for themselves, and the developers began to make controllers for it, and subsequently transfer them to new mothers. Developers and manufacturers immediately appreciated the benefits of standardization (do it according to the standard and the demand for this will not be limited to one clone, and mass production is more profitable single) and that’s how it stuck. And now not a single sane developer will begin to invent something of his own.

From Yakovlev Anton To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat lam> forum participants from the what is speccy thread write there directly from cash :v2_lol:

From Chunin Roman To All 5 December 2006

Hello, psndcj psn> MODERS!!! kill the topic!!! psn> psn> if you disagree, let's have a vote =) I suggest moving it to flame...

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 5 December 2006

Hello, The Exploited The> disagree. I am against censorship What does censorship have to do with it? Everything will remain on the forum. Simply by its content this discussion has no value as "Iron". This is a typical flame. To this section she cares too. Those who wish, in accordance with freedom of speech, can continue chat there.

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> If you want to get answers, stick to the topic, Max’s “insanity,” Bla> Romana", as well as what I know, or not, how and what will happen is off topic Bla> applies. And if you want to make fun, do it somewhere else, same thing Bla> also applies to Maxagor. There will be no answer to your teasing. F-u-u-u-u, great-a-active! I won’t talk to you guys! No need to. I sometimes indulge in literary hyperbole (consider it as jerk off as much as you want. I won't argue. Maybe it is so). But here are my words about lameness, basic ignorance of the Spectrum (not even ATM - this was already clear to me long ago, and other clones, and just Spectrum) and the delirium of recent posts is specific, serious accusation.

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> The development of ATM-3, as far as I know, is only planned. It's already started. We do not report to the people every day about the degree of readiness of the project. obliged. And 2+ continues to develop in terms of software and firmware. > Criticism can be creative if it warns against misconceptions. > You know the saying: “A friend is not the one who sweetly flatters the eyes, but the one who > can tell the truth, albeit bitter." (I’m not trying to make friends :) ) And besides, you don’t relate to those who “know the bitter truth.” > The development of ATM-3 is carried out by CHRV, I am not involved in it and slow down > I can’t, unless CHRV took into account the “criticism” now > is remaking the ATM-3 again, but as far as I know from his statements > development has not started yet. It has begun. Moreover, long before the sale of assembled boards was stopped. This time. Secondly, ATM3 will be fully compatible with ATM2+, which means will save all its modes. > Yes, but ZX platforms, not just any platform, and development, not destruction > under the guise of development. I agree. We develop precisely: carefully, slowly, maintaining fullcompatibility and connection (hardware and software) of new modes with old ones, in advance taking care of filling innovations with software. > Do you remember the fairy tale about the naked king? :) Do you think you should drive > for example CHRV praising ATM by the nose? No need to praise. But in my opinion it is already useless to explain to the whole forum "the king Black_CATu" that he is naked... > So, the Spectrum community will be better off if instead of ZX compatible > company will they produce something alien? Alien is a purely personal concept. Here, at the CC, I approached the stands with Spectrums the peasant sighed that before there were 40 keys and a tape, but now all sorts of disk drives, cases, remote keyboards, three-channel sound... "No, it's not speckie. That spirit no longer exists."... In his own way, for himself personally, he is right. But he doesn't imposed his feelings through verbal diarrhea on other people. > I have no prejudice towards ATM. Yes (although literally until today I thought it wasn’t). And all the nonsense about him (for example, about the mythical “speed” (what is this phenomenon?) of the memory manager, due to which the software becomes incompatible) confirms this. > I treat this computer the same way as others, but unlike others > its development (development of ATM-3) can still be influenced. I doubt. Although if there are really SPECIFIC proposals.... > Who will win if development goes “in the wrong direction” and as a result ATM-3 becomes > a stillborn monster? It won't. I speak with confidence. Because the principles of innovation, what needs to be introduced and what will definitely be a “dead weight” - I understand, as can be seen from the discussion, by an order of magnitude better than you. And Roman additionally understands the complexity of implementing this or that different in terms of "iron". > Treatment is rarely a pleasant procedure, and these are bitter pills > inevitability. Listen, try, at least once, for example here, don’t look for the speck in the eye of others, but notice the beam in your own eye? Well, at least just once!

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> ZX48-128 is not two platforms, but one Original ZX platform, Bla> inherited from us after the death of Sinclair Research Ltd. Based on your principles, these are two different platforms. > Extensions of the ZX128 relative to the ZX48 do not show signs of a new one > platform, Based on your principles - they carry it. Moreover, the ZX-48 and ZX-128 made different people. However, Shaos answered you on this matter. > they can only be classified as add-ons over the base > platform that are part of this platform. This is based on my principles, not yours, this is an add-on to base platform. > Just as later such add-ons became for the xUSSR ZX platform > TR-DOS disk system Well, this can still be considered an architecture add-on (new ROM and call him via #3Dxx). > and NemoBus. The fact that you do not want to understand the platform > hierarchy leads to your disorientation - you just don’t understand how > everything is correlated and therefore you get into trouble over and over again. Am I the one who got into trouble? Don’t drive me away: you’ve just gotten yourself into trouble,and sat down in a puddle of shit: > How is the NemoBUS bus an add-on????? This weight is just a standardized and buffered output from the board the main signals of the processor and the board itself. That is, an iron connector, not adding no port, no mode - nothing to the computer. In other words, although this is useful, but just a part on the board. In other words, if you put next to two ZX-128+AY+TR-DOS, differing from each other only in the presence of a bus, then the difference for the user will only be in the convenience of connecting new standard devices. One will simply insert them into the connector, while the other will have to use a soldering iron. Nothing more. And with the filing of "BC" - it became a new word in development of computer architecture. > Again: ATM already has signs of a new platform - this > its new screens Why the hell are new screens a sign of a new platform? (here Just don’t overwhelm me with links to your monographs. Give your reasons here and now) The ZX-128 also has a new screen - more precisely, a second screen page. And demos for The ZX-128 won't work just because of lack of memory. But because with one the screen on the ZX-128, in principle, it will not be possible to repeat such effects as 2bitplan, 3color, smooth movement of sprites, etc., etc. Conclusion - ZX-128 isa gross violation of the ZX-48 architecture, therefore the ZX-128 is not a Speccy. Well the fact that all 48K software is compatible with it is the third thing... > and a memory manager that differs from the standard one in terms of operating speed. Do you understand what bullshit you pulled? What does speed have to do with it? Where did you dig it from? “speed differences” that even I don’t know about? There are no differences. Yes innovations in addition to the standard (especially since at some speed not having a relationship), but not instead of it. In short: ZX-128 and ATM are not Spectrum, because: 1. there are screens and/or screen pages that are not present in the ZX-48. 2. There are innovations in architecture, because of which you need to run 48-software tune into 48-mode (in the ZX-128 - you need to turn on the zero screen, at #0000 is a page from the BAS-48 ROM, and at address #C000 is page #00 of RAM. V V ATM a little more - zero screen, resolution 256x192, standard palette. at the address #0000 - ROM page with BAS-48, in #4000 - RAM 5, in #8000 - RAM 2, in #C000 - RAM 0), and without this the vast majority of 48 software will not work! Moreover, the software using the new modes will be incompatible with the ZX-48 and will not work for owners this platform! Conclusion - both the ZX-128 and ATM are monster hybrids for "Business Applications" Compatible in Real Genuine and Super True Spectrum only in one of its modes. So said the Great Me!> So there is no nonsense in this, there is your misunderstanding of the situation. only in knowledge of the ATM architecture (which is still excusable), but also the architecture Specky, moreover, generally misunderstands the meaning of the word architecture.

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> 3) There about NemoBus: God be with you, where have you seen this? :) ATMovsky Bla> memory manager is faster than those Bla> managers that exist on other domestic clones (but Bla> they are equally slow, although they differ in addresses and bits). B Bla> result, when writing some kind of mythical program, Bla> working with the memory manager of different clones, on ATM it is unlike Bla> of other ZX clones will execute faster. Those. in the case of ATM Bla> we have a different from the standard information dissemination environment (in Bla> in this case according to time parameters), and this is a sign Bla> of another platform. And what places does this manager switch to? Bla> banks do not play any role, and I did not mention this. Gee-gee-gee-gee-gee-gee!!!!!! Are you saying that the team LD A,#nn; LD; BC,#7FFD; OUT(C),A; (for lamers - switching pages in the memory manager) will be execute faster in ATM? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Listen, where did you get this information from? Why didn't you ask me if you were doing everything right?Understood? As someone familiar with the ATM architecture, I say that this is not a mistake - this is exactly where Nonsense, not even remotely related to reality. And not only by in relation to ATM, but also in relation to all other clones, memory managers which (as we this comrade for the first time in decades of Speccy's existence opened!) supposedly "equally slow" (do you even know that access to the top (and not the top) memory of any clone can be made in different ways, with a different set of coman. And depending on this, a different number of cycles will be required for switching pages?)! I'm bursting with laughter. Mister: you are a complete lame: a) as an iron expert (you don’t understand at all what architecture is and how the hardware and connectors relate to it). b) as a programmer (does not understand basic functioning processor and processing of commands). c) Lamer, not a teapot because he not only doesn’t know shit, but on the contrary, I am sure that he knows absolutely everything, at least enough to give advice to others, which is what he self-confidently does. Taking into account the above nonsense, I, as a Speccy programmer (not an archvirtuoso, but still), I insist - this topic, and the topic with "Chimera" - in the flame!

From Timonin Maxim Anatolievich To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> 1)BDI Bla> 2)Multicard Nemo, Caro, etc. Bla> 3)GS Bla> 4) I don’t know for sure, but it seems there was a modem too. In fact, the presence of a bus (that is, a connector) only makes the connection easier (inserted it - and that’s it. No need to solder), but it doesn’t do it just because of this possible. For example, back in 2000 I successfully connected a soldering iron to the terminals processor still on ATM-1 General Sound. ZX-Nemo BUS is a wonderful thing, it’s a pity that the MicroART people didn’t make it in their time (well, by 1991 it was like There was no domestic Russian standard in nature. Is it in your head? Nemo and Zonova). It will definitely be in ATM-3. That's just to the internal This connector has nothing to do with the computer architecture. These are different non-overlapping concepts.

From Mark Antonov To All 5 December 2006

Hello, psndcj psn> MODERS!!! kill the topic!!! psn> psn> if you disagree, let's have a vote =) fuck you. I suggest covering your ears and other senses. CHR> I suggest moving it to flame... disagree. I'm against censorship

From Mark Antonov To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> 1)BDI Bla> 2)Multicard Nemo, Caro, etc. Bla> 3)GS Bla> 4) I don’t know for sure, but it seems there was a modem too. BDI from Nemo, keyboard and mouse controller, smuc, PROSCO programmer, Midi interface from scorp, xtr-modem and gs. there was also a Christmas tree

From poisoned cyberjack To All 5 December 2006

Hello, SAM style MODERS!!! kill the topic!!! If you disagree, let's have a vote =)

From ilyaspb To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Posted by SAM style back then it was a foreign spec device. And then YYT took root and became the standard. Where is the fracture? And the turning point in the magic word Nemo - read by God! Re Black Cat: and the developers started making controllers for it, and what controllers did they start making? what devices (well, except for the IDE from Nemo)

From deathsoft To All 5 December 2006

Hello, CHRV CHR> I suggest moving it to flame... I support the chimera too

From Valery Tkachuck To All 5 December 2006

Hello, ilyaspb ily> and what controllers did they start making? what devices (well, except for the IDE from ily> Nemo) 1)BDI 2)Multicard Nemo, Caro, etc. 3)GS 4) I don’t know for sure, but it seems there was a modem too. 5) There were also attempts to develop video controllers with additional video modes, but nothing remained in single copy. In general, almost the entire set of PC devices plugged into the expansion bus.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 5 December 2006

Hello, SAM style SAM> Quote: SAM> NemoBus is a slightly modified ZXBus SAM> SAM> Changing the standard discredits the spec. NemoBus is evil! ZXBus did not take root in the USSR, but its modification NemoBus became the xUSSR standard ZX platforms. If you want to get answers, stick to the topic, "insanity" of Max, Roman, and Also, what I know, or not, how and what will happen is not relevant to the topic. What if If you want to make fun, do it somewhere else, the same applies to Maxagor. On there will be no answer to your mockery.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 5 December 2006

Hello, SAM style SAM> By what criteria (list!) do you classify BDI, Nemo IDE and SAM> AY/Yamaha to “incorruptible spec hardware”, but the fact that in ATM any SAM> the page can be placed in any of the 4 memory locations you name SAM> "enemy development" Dear SAM style, where were you when all this was being discussed? :) Or for for every latecomer to start lectures again? And your “” probably should it be taken as an apology for being late? :) Be kind and behave decently in society :) . 1) We got AY with the ZX128 as part of the platform and nothing can be done here. :) 2) In fact, I mentioned BDI once, and even then in the context of the fact that it has nothing to do with the platform: Bla> So, for example, the TR-DOS system is an integral part of the platform, and Bla> the FDD controller itself is not. Bla> Thus, we can define the platform: ZX platform C is Bla> structural features of the address space of ports and memory, as well as Bla> features of the video processor architecture of the original ZX-Spectrum Bla> compatible SOS, using Z80 command system, as well asBla> extension - using TR-DOS as a disk system Bla> information storage and NemoBus as a hardware interface Bla> extensions. ( http://www.zx.pk.ru/showpost.php?p=57749&postcount=106 ) So why are you confusing there was nothing like that :). 3) In the same place about NemoBus; Bla>; The concept of platform is somewhat broader, because includes Bla> which have become the standard in a certain territory Bla> propagation of changes and additions relative to the original. B Bla> in this case, the territory of distribution is understood as the ex-USSR. When Bla> this expanded interpretation of the platform does not impose requirements Bla> is required, because these extensions and changes are Bla> an add-on to an existing platform. An example of generally accepted Bla> changes can serve as corrections and additions to SOS, as well as Bla> using TR-DOS as a disk storage system Bla> and NemoBus as a hardware expansion interface. SAM> and the fact that in ATM any page can be placed in any of 4 places inYou call SAM> memory an “enemy development” God bless you, where have you seen this? :) ATM memory manager is different speed compared to those managers that exist on other domestic clones (but they are equally slow, although they differ in addresses and bits). As a result, when writing some even mythical program, working with the memory manager of different clones, on ATM it is unlike the others ZX clones will execute faster. Those. in the case of ATM we have a different standard information dissemination environment (in this case, according to temporary parameters), and this is a sign of a different platform. And then in what places this manager switches banks does not play any role, and I’m not talking about it mentioned.

From Valery Tkachuck To All 5 December 2006

Hello, CHRV CHR> I suggest moving it to flame... Comrade moderator, you are being disingenuous. There is no voting mechanism here. Alas, no provided for by the charter. All decisions are made by moderators, so no need for arrows translate to someone. In this matter there is only your decision and decision forum administration. There are violations - tell me what. No - don’t fool people’s heads.

From Alexandr Sinyakov To All 5 December 2006

Hello, CHRV And by the way... I vote for killing both topics (this and the chimera) completely. Or at least close.

From Alexandr Sinyakov To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Where I was was entirely my business. But this... Bla> ...includes those that have become standard... According to your own manual (which no one has ever read, does not read and won’t read it, because you’re already boring for everyone ...), he back then it was a foreign spec device. And then YYT took root and became the standard. Where is the fracture?

From Alexandr Sinyakov To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> And if you want to make fun, do it somewhere else Well, so you need to pour everything into the flame and have fun there. Max said about “not applicable” - see paragraph 3. Depends a lot on your knowledge the level of your nonsense! Ehm... Sclerosis has knocked me down... Remind me why you stood out in the spec except tongue-scratching?

From Alexandr Sinyakov To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat > NemoBus is a slightly modified ZXBus Changing the standard discredits the spec. NemoBus is evil! > And now not a single sane developer will invent something > yours. Conclusion - you are insane. You invent some crap (don’t deny it, I’m talking about your I saw new video modes in the chimera) while the “insane” Max, Roman and your comrades have already invented gadgets that you still have to conceptualize and conceptualize because you don’t know HOW yours will be realized nonsense.

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 5 December 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> And here's what's on Conan's website about this; "How was it different Bla> English version of its Spanish twin? Differences Bla> circuit design was minimal: they added a choke in the stabilizer Bla> (a place for which was already provided) and a filter in the shaper Bla> television signal. In all other respects the schemes were identical." Bla> http://zxnext.narod.ru/hist1986.htm New throttle according to you Is Bla> a sign of a new platform? You should still read the manual, otherwise it’s in concept Bla> platforms are completely floating. :) It's a no brainer that the British version of the ZX-128 differs little from the Spanish one - and both were assembled in Spanish factories ;) But the ZX-128 differed significantly from the ZX-48 - and according to my standards, the ZX-128 is quite can be called a platform different from the ZX-48 (like the ATM itself, which is a Spectrum clone, and even if anyone wants it - a “hardware emulator” the original Spectrum and some of its modifications, plus it has its own own capabilities as a completely independent and complete platform).

From Alexander Shabarshin To All 5 December 2006

Hello, CHRV CHR> I suggest moving it to flame... Yes - it’s more logical to move the topic to the “Flame” section because it’s more preferable for for this topic(s), the "Bullshit" section is not provided on this forum;)