SMUK HDD + open ports

Peep Hi! FirestarterHDS is tirelessly improving our HDD_mounter but it turns out you can make it even faster. What kind of modification on Scorp opens the ports??? Please give me the URL or email me Thanks in advance, BugsyHDS mailto:bugsy@ncn.ru http://bugsy.narod.ru icq# 234912911

Hello Roman! Tuesday 15 July 2003 13:11:49 Roman Fheydorov -> All: RF> FirestarterHDS is tirelessly improving our HDD_mounter RF> but it turns out you can make it even faster. And much faster - at least three times. After opening ports, the reading speed will mainly depend on straightness of the programmer's hands... RF> What kind of modification on Scorp opens ports??? RF> Give pleez URL or send it to e-mail I put two methods on e-soap - according to Kozhevnikov and according to GMX. [REAL ZX]

Press RESET immediately, Nikolaj Amosov! On Wed, 16 Jul 03 20:51:43 +0400, Nikolaj Amosov wrote: NA> And much faster - at least three times. After opening NA> ports, the reading speed will mainly depend on NA> directness of the programmer's hands... The more stack space, the faster... read_sector: ; hl=where ld bc, ide_data_port_low exx ld hl, eiret push hl ld hl, -512*6*2 ld bc, 6*2 add hl, sp ldde, stackdata ld sp, hl push hl ex de, hl ldir pop hl ld bc, 6*2*511 ldir ld bc, ide_data_port_high di ret eiret: ei ret stackdata: dw 0x3d2f, 0x3ff3, xxx dw 0x3d2f, 0x3ff3, yyy xxx: exx ld d,a ret yyy: ld (hl), d inc hl ld (hl), a inc hl exx ret

Hello Nikolaj! 16 Jul 03 21:51, Nikolaj Amosov -> Roman Fheydorov: RF>> FirestarterHDS is tirelessly improving our HDD_mounter RF>> but it turns out you can make it even faster. NA> And much faster - at least three times. After opening NA> ports, the reading speed will mainly depend on NA> directness of the programmer's hands... 20 clock cycles to read a byte. There is no way to go faster. RF>> What kind of modification on Scorp opens ports??? RF>> Give pleez URL or send it to e-mail NA> I put two methods on e-soap - according to Kozhevnikov and according to GMX. How are they different? There is only one meaning - hang a jar with a bit in the port below trdosom and enable the same ports. WBR, Jason. /*e-mail: jason2000(scary dog)yandex.ru ICQ: 62235830*/ /np:/ *silence*

Hello, Kirill! 19 Jul 03 18:43, Kirill Frolov -> Nikolaj Amosov: NA>> And much faster - at least three times. After opening NA>> ports, the reading speed will mainly depend on NA>> directness of the programmer's hands... KF> The more stack space, the faster... KF> read_sector: ; hl=where KF> ld bc, ide_data_port_low Just count the beats. LD C,#BE LD DE,#D8F8 ;stack to fill: #3ff3,xxxx,#3ff3,yyyy i.e. 4 addresses per cycle. ;commented lines are executed in ROM LD B,E ;4 JP #3D30 ;10 ; RET ;10 ; IN A,(C) ;12 ; RET ;10 xxxx LD (HL),A ;8 INC HL ;6 60 LD B,D JP #3D30 ; RET ; IN A,(C) ; RET yyyy LD (HL),A INC HL And in the case of open ports LD B,E ;4 INI ;16 20 LD B,D INI The difference in speed is exactly three times. 58.33 kb/sec versus 175 kb/sec on open ports. Ruiner once posted here the results of his speed tests of different restartsshadow (by the way, does anyone still have it? Otherwise I want to remember). It worked out something around 30 to 100 kbps, depending on the target address and used sector length. It’s better to solder one small circuit and use the speed to its fullest. WBR, Jason. /*e-mail: jason2000(scary dog)yandex.ru ICQ: 62235830*/ /np:/ *silence*