SamCoupe scheme

ZXNet echo conference «hardware.zx»

From Chunin Roman To All 22 October 2006

Hello, All Our Czech friend released the schematic for this clone: http://velesoft.speccy.cz/samcoupe_schematics-cz.htm

From acidrain To All 22 October 2006

Hello fan This news makes me happy! I will be only too glad to have a semkupa for myself! Thank you, Roma for the info!!!

From Alexander Zan To All 22 October 2006

Hello, CHRV As I understand it ;) ZY Somehow I have its modification SpeccyBob - SPECCYBOB 128 does not open, password protected!

From Alexander Zan To All 23 October 2006

Hello, mig'95 mig> It’s even strange that iron workers avoid this topic in discussions. mig> Why not use SAM as a standard in manufacturing mig> modern specs? Yeah, but Pushkin will clone the chipset. Considering virtually zero interest to newly pressed iron (and not to what is exchanged for beer/pepsicol) and the reluctance of the majority to wave a soldering iron, only a maniac can recreate it, purely for my own curiosity.

From Igor Mamonov To All 23 October 2006

Hello, acidrain I was pleasantly surprised by the graphical capabilities of this machine. It's even strange that Iron workers avoid this topic in discussions. Why not use SAM as a standard in the production of modern specks? This was probably the question to CHRV :)

From Alexander Yudin To All 23 October 2006

Hello fan fan> IMHO a bad example... Not sold in the store (just like brains fan> kney), not shoved into the matrix by anyone (non-clonable fan> piece of hardware=dead (IMHO)), the final price of the device is insane;) Hmm, I thought the chip was easy to get. Then I don’t see any way out. IMHO development and catching glitches of similar capabilities device will take an immeasurable amount of time and compatibility? Here it was at least somehow possible to transfer ready-made programs. And the price can be even more insane, all sorts of looseness, matrix the required capacity may also not be cheap.

From Alexander Yudin To All 23 October 2006

Hello fan fan> only a maniac will recreate it, purely for the sake of his own curiosity. And I don’t think we need to recreate anything like that even no matter how good the solutions are. Otherwise it will take a very long time will choose and a lot of time will be spent on development, etc. For 9990 was created for us long ago, it contains everything we need, quite standard, well documented, easy to use. So look up to him. By the way, how are things going with the development of a distant video card?

From Alexander Zan To All 23 October 2006

Hello Costa Cos> Because 9990 was created for us a long time ago, it contains everything we need Cos> is quite standard, well documented, easy to use. IMHO a bad example... Not sold in the store (just like the brains of kneys), in matrix not shoved by anyone (non-clonable piece of hardware = dead (IMHO)), final price the device is insane ;)

From Igor Mamonov To All 23 October 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> It’s not clear what exactly surprised you?:confused; B; In general, Lethargeek has already answered for me. I’ll add from myself that I would like It’s interesting to try your hand at writing something (and further mastering ASMA Z80) for this machine. Just in case, I’ll give here a couple of links that (seemingly) have already flashed in this forum: http://images3.deviantart.com/i/2004/159/e/1/My_Secret_Pixel_Past_1990_1996.jpg http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=26454&package_id=18053&re lease_id=433800 ZY IMHO the ideal computer for some kind of school club.

From Chunin Roman To All 23 October 2006

Hello Costa Cos> By the way, how are things going with the development of a distant video card? There are already results... Vitka Ronin draws a diagram, kick him :). This really has nothing to do with the topic! We get the chip normally and not at an exorbitant price (although more expensive than a bottle of beer significantly)

From Dmitry Malychev To All 23 October 2006

Hello Costa Cos> ...and compatibility ? Cos> here it was at least somehow possible to transfer ready-made programs. Compatible with what? Transfer from where?

From Dmitry Malychev To All 23 October 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> It’s not clear what exactly surprised you?:confused; This is; all the old spektrumist complexes regarding the number of independent colors and pixels. ;) But the speed of operation in these modes with graphics (and not only with graphics, when the “seemingly fast” percentage is generally “killed” by the scanner) - no one is unpleasant surprised? I also advise you to pay attention to the percentage of puzzles to the rest toys. :rolleyes:

From Alexander Yudin To All 23 October 2006

Hello Lethargeek Let> Compatible with what? Let> Transfer from where? Compatible with 99xx line (MSX) A certain amount of software has already been developed for this chip. All this has already been discussed in the topic "Turbo Video v9990". Let's move the conversation there. CHR> There are already results... CHR> Vitka Ronin draws a diagram, kick him. CHR> This really has nothing to do with the topic! CHR> CHR> We can get the chip normally and not at an exorbitant price (although more expensive than a bottle CHR> beer significantly) This answer already makes me happy: v2_yahoo:

From Valery Tkachuck To All 23 October 2006

Hello Costa Is there a description on the computer somewhere? Like ports, video modes? Here http://velesoft.speccy.cz/ ["http://velesoft.speccy.cz/"] nothing.

From Andreas Kaiser To All 24 October 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Is there a description on the computer somewhere? Like ports, video modes? Here Bla> http://velesoft.speccy.cz/ ["http://velesoft.speccy.cz/"] nothing. Google rules? http://www.sam-coupe.co.uk/

From Dmitry Malychev To All 24 October 2006

Hello Costa Cos> Compatible with the 99xx line (MSX) Cos> A certain amount of software has already been developed for this chip. Yeah, somewhere there was already a thread about the quantity and quality of MSX toys. :v2_conf2; AND; Software is still always “for the computer”, and not “for the chip”. Cos> All this has already been discussed in the topic "Turbo Video v9990". Cos> Let's move the conversation there. And the topic itself is in "Other Computers". :D

From Valery Tkachuck To All 25 October 2006

Hello Costa mig> Why not use SAM as a standard in manufacturing mig> modern specs? Cos> And I don’t think we even need to recreate anything like that Cos> no matter how good the solutions are About 15 years ago, if “everyone suddenly” turned to this platform, then maybe something would have happened it would be, but this is fantasy, because then everyone was fighting for simplicity, and FPGAs were still were unavailable. And now there is no point. Now this would degenerate into another Siamese twin incompatible in ports and periphery. And although technologically this machine is now available, but its train has left long ago. She doesn't will solve existing problems, and will definitely add new ones. Conclusion: it is better to develop what you have and not to spread yourself thin.

From Alexander Yudin To All 25 October 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> it is better to develop what you have and not to be scattered. The> mode 16 colors per pixel => 24kb screen and 47 thousand interrupt cycles Well, the modes that we currently have are no good at all No matter how you develop them, they are of no use 0. Only statics and no talk about dynamics. But I just want normal dynamics. Tempoly as I once said. Let our Spectrum finally have a normal video card. Whoever needs it will install it, whoever is interested in programming for it he will program it. Why not?

From van Yu Shinn To All 25 October 2006

Hello, CHRV The> 47 thousand cycles in interrupt Who has this?

From Mark Antonov To All 25 October 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Conclusion: it is better to develop what you have 16 colors per pixel mode => 24kb screen and 47 thousand interrupt cycles

From Mark Antonov To All 25 October 2006

Hello, captain cobalt cap> Who has this? in 16col mode the whole time the beam is traveling across the screen the percentage is - 71680-192*128=47104

From Valery Tkachuck To All 25 October 2006

Hello, The Exploited SAMCoupe is not a standard machine - starting from the processor clock frequency and ending with an immeasurable number of new ports. This means using it as The only operating mode will be: either SAM or your usual Spec. Do this ugliness is possible, for example, in a rebootable FPGA, but I’m sure it’s not for anyone necessary (at least among those who can do it :smile; ).; Conclusion: who needs SAM - take data from Czech colleagues and do it, or what It's easier - use emulsion.

From Chunin Roman To All 25 October 2006

Hello, Black_Cat Bla> Conclusion: who needs SAM - take data from Czech colleagues and do it Bla> or, which is easier, use the emulsion. The link was posted as reference information - nothing more and nothing less. VeleSoft plans to make a universal clone, so you can write to it.