From
Chunin Roman
→
To
All
22 October 2006
Hello, All
Our Czech friend released the schematic for this clone:
http://velesoft.speccy.cz/samcoupe_schematics-cz.htm
From
acidrain
→
To
All
22 October 2006
Hello fan
This news makes me happy! I will be only too glad to have a semkupa for myself! Thank you, Roma
for the info!!!
From
Alexander Zan
→
To
All
22 October 2006
Hello, CHRV
As I understand it ;)
ZY Somehow I have its modification SpeccyBob - SPECCYBOB 128 does not open,
password protected!
From
Alexander Zan
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello, mig'95
mig> It’s even strange that iron workers avoid this topic in discussions.
mig> Why not use SAM as a standard in manufacturing
mig> modern specs?
Yeah, but Pushkin will clone the chipset. Considering virtually zero interest
to newly pressed iron (and not to what is exchanged for beer/pepsicol)
and the reluctance of the majority to wave a soldering iron, only a maniac can recreate it,
purely for my own curiosity.
From
Igor Mamonov
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello, acidrain
I was pleasantly surprised by the graphical capabilities of this machine. It's even strange that
Iron workers avoid this topic in discussions. Why not use
SAM as a standard in the production of modern specks? This was probably the question
to CHRV :)
From
Alexander Yudin
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello fan
fan> IMHO a bad example... Not sold in the store (just like brains
fan> kney), not shoved into the matrix by anyone (non-clonable
fan> piece of hardware=dead (IMHO)), the final price of the device is insane;)
Hmm, I thought the chip was easy to get.
Then I don’t see any way out.
IMHO development and catching glitches of similar capabilities
device will take an immeasurable amount of time and compatibility?
Here it was at least somehow possible to transfer ready-made programs.
And the price can be even more insane, all sorts of looseness, matrix
the required capacity may also not be cheap.
From
Alexander Yudin
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello fan
fan> only a maniac will recreate it, purely for the sake of his own curiosity.
And I don’t think we need to recreate anything like that even
no matter how good the solutions are. Otherwise it will take a very long time
will choose and a lot of time will be spent on development, etc.
For 9990 was created for us long ago, it contains everything we need,
quite standard, well documented, easy to use.
So look up to him.
By the way, how are things going with the development of a distant video card?
From
Alexander Zan
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello Costa
Cos> Because 9990 was created for us a long time ago, it contains everything we need
Cos> is quite standard, well documented, easy to use.
IMHO a bad example... Not sold in the store (just like the brains of kneys), in
matrix not shoved by anyone (non-clonable piece of hardware = dead (IMHO)), final price
the device is insane ;)
From
Igor Mamonov
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> It’s not clear what exactly surprised you?:confused;
B; In general, Lethargeek has already answered for me. I’ll add from myself that I would like
It’s interesting to try your hand at writing something (and further mastering
ASMA Z80) for this machine.
Just in case, I’ll give here a couple of links that (seemingly) have already flashed
in this forum:
http://images3.deviantart.com/i/2004/159/e/1/My_Secret_Pixel_Past_1990_1996.jpg
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=26454&package_id=18053&re
lease_id=433800
ZY IMHO the ideal computer for some kind of school club.
From
Chunin Roman
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello Costa
Cos> By the way, how are things going with the development of a distant video card?
There are already results...
Vitka Ronin draws a diagram, kick him :).
This really has nothing to do with the topic!
We get the chip normally and not at an exorbitant price (although more expensive than a bottle of beer
significantly)
From
Dmitry Malychev
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello Costa
Cos> ...and compatibility ?
Cos> here it was at least somehow possible to transfer ready-made programs.
Compatible with what?
Transfer from where?
From
Dmitry Malychev
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> It’s not clear what exactly surprised you?:confused;
This is; all the old spektrumist complexes regarding the number of independent
colors and pixels. ;)
But the speed of operation in these modes with graphics (and not only with graphics,
when the “seemingly fast” percentage is generally “killed” by the scanner) - no one is unpleasant
surprised?
I also advise you to pay attention to the percentage of puzzles to the rest
toys. :rolleyes:
From
Alexander Yudin
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello Lethargeek
Let> Compatible with what?
Let> Transfer from where?
Compatible with 99xx line (MSX)
A certain amount of software has already been developed for this chip.
All this has already been discussed in the topic "Turbo Video v9990".
Let's move the conversation there.
CHR> There are already results...
CHR> Vitka Ronin draws a diagram, kick him.
CHR> This really has nothing to do with the topic!
CHR>
CHR> We can get the chip normally and not at an exorbitant price (although more expensive than a bottle
CHR> beer significantly)
This answer already makes me happy: v2_yahoo:
From
Valery Tkachuck
→
To
All
23 October 2006
Hello Costa
Is there a description on the computer somewhere? Like ports, video modes? Here
http://velesoft.speccy.cz/ ["http://velesoft.speccy.cz/"] nothing.
From
Andreas Kaiser
→
To
All
24 October 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> Is there a description on the computer somewhere? Like ports, video modes? Here
Bla> http://velesoft.speccy.cz/ ["http://velesoft.speccy.cz/"] nothing.
Google rules? http://www.sam-coupe.co.uk/
From
Dmitry Malychev
→
To
All
24 October 2006
Hello Costa
Cos> Compatible with the 99xx line (MSX)
Cos> A certain amount of software has already been developed for this chip.
Yeah, somewhere there was already a thread about the quantity and quality of MSX toys.
:v2_conf2;
AND; Software is still always “for the computer”, and not “for the chip”.
Cos> All this has already been discussed in the topic "Turbo Video v9990".
Cos> Let's move the conversation there.
And the topic itself is in "Other Computers". :D
From
Valery Tkachuck
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello Costa
mig> Why not use SAM as a standard in manufacturing
mig> modern specs?
Cos> And I don’t think we even need to recreate anything like that
Cos> no matter how good the solutions are
About 15 years ago, if “everyone suddenly” turned to this platform, then maybe something would have happened
it would be, but this is fantasy, because then everyone was fighting for simplicity, and FPGAs were still
were unavailable. And now there is no point. Now this would degenerate into
another Siamese twin incompatible in ports and periphery. And although
technologically this machine is now available, but its train has left long ago. She doesn't
will solve existing problems, and will definitely add new ones.
Conclusion: it is better to develop what you have and not to spread yourself thin.
From
Alexander Yudin
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> it is better to develop what you have and not to be scattered.
The> mode 16 colors per pixel => 24kb screen and 47 thousand interrupt cycles
Well, the modes that we currently have are no good at all
No matter how you develop them, they are of no use 0. Only statics and no talk about dynamics.
But I just want normal dynamics.
Tempoly as I once said.
Let our Spectrum finally have a normal video card.
Whoever needs it will install it, whoever is interested in programming for it
he will program it. Why not?
From
van Yu Shinn
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello, CHRV
The> 47 thousand cycles in interrupt
Who has this?
From
Mark Antonov
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> Conclusion: it is better to develop what you have
16 colors per pixel mode => 24kb screen and 47 thousand interrupt cycles
From
Mark Antonov
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello, captain cobalt
cap> Who has this?
in 16col mode the whole time the beam is traveling across the screen the percentage is -
71680-192*128=47104
From
Valery Tkachuck
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello, The Exploited
SAMCoupe is not a standard machine - starting from the processor clock frequency and
ending with an immeasurable number of new ports. This means using it as
The only operating mode will be: either SAM or your usual Spec. Do this
ugliness is possible, for example, in a rebootable FPGA, but I’m sure it’s not for anyone
necessary (at least among those who can do it :smile; ).;
Conclusion: who needs SAM - take data from Czech colleagues and do it, or what
It's easier - use emulsion.
From
Chunin Roman
→
To
All
25 October 2006
Hello, Black_Cat
Bla> Conclusion: who needs SAM - take data from Czech colleagues and do it
Bla> or, which is easier, use the emulsion.
The link was posted as reference information - nothing more and nothing less. VeleSoft
plans to make a universal clone, so you can write to it.