From
Kharko Pavel
→
To
All
24 February 2006
Hello, All
Good day. After looking at several diagrams, I concluded that my
SLAVUTICH is Leningrad 2. I’m very interested in what thoughts anyone has about this
cars. Thanks in advance
From
Alexander Zan
→
To
All
24 February 2006
Hello, 80xx
Do you have any specific questions? %)
From
Kharko Pavel
→
To
All
24 February 2006
Hello fan
I am interested in the features of this machine, since this is my first spec.
possible glitches, etc., etc.
From
Alexander Zan
→
To
All
25 February 2006
Hello, 80xx
It seems that his FE port is also not decrypted quite correctly. Need according to the scheme
take a look.
From
Vlad Semchenko
→
To
All
27 February 2006
Hello, 80xx
80x> I am interested in the features of this machine, since this is my first
80x> spec. interested in possible glitches, etc., etc.
I can say about my “workhorse” that it is, in principle, standard
48K machine. There are only 2 ports on board - FE and 1F. The disadvantage of the car can be considered
low purely clock cycles per frame, I don’t remember exactly, somewhere around 69000. Because of this
some programs do not work, in particular I had to struggle for a long time with launching
ZX-Power#3 and DOOMMANIA. The magazine started after 10-20 attempts, and in the game it was possible
You can only move around blindly, guided only by the map. But, there is a diagram from
VMG, which solves this problem (increases pure clock cycles per frame).
But in general the computer is not bad and IMHO “more correct” in comparison with
Leningrad1. I expanded it (L2) to 128K with FDD and AY, everything worked.
Taking this opportunity, I would like to once again ask those present, someone
does anyone know anything about the origin of the clone? The fact that this is not Zonov’s development is
almost a fact. Or maybe at least the users of the subject will speak out, so that
determine its habitat.
From
Konstantin Sviridov
→
To
All
27 February 2006
Hello spensor
spe> Taking this opportunity, I would like to once again ask those present,
spe> does anyone know anything about the origin of the clone? What it is not
spe> Zonov's development, it's almost a fact. Or maybe they’ll at least speak out
spe> users of the subject to determine its habitat.
Vlad, I remember the topic about the authorship of "Leningrad 2" came up in our correspondence,
so I asked on occasion (in personal correspondence) questions about the origin
the specified clone. No exact answer was received, but about the fact that computers on
it was based on mass production, I heard it several times. I think that's what we're talking about
, therefore information on its manufacturer is interesting. If 2> was produced by NPO "Slavutich" and the case of the computer of the same name was adapted for
fee, then this is probably their brainchild. In any case, most often
It is mentioned specifically by Ukrainian spektrumists.
From
Vlad Semchenko
→
To
All
27 February 2006
Hello Conan
Con> In any case, is mentioned most often
Con> by Ukrainian spektrumists.
This is actually interesting, because someone (I don’t remember who exactly)
suggested that since clones were usually called by
city-developer, then the subject is most likely from St. Petersburg. And about this I have
there is doubt. And I wanted, if not to find out the truth, then at least to have
plausible version.
Question for 80xx, are there any labels on the board? If you would like to take a photo
(emblem)!
From
Timonin Maxim Anatolievich
→
To
All
27 February 2006
Hello spensor
spe> that since clones were usually named after the city of development, then the subject
spe> most likely from St. Petersburg.
Yeah! Then all the “pentagons” (good thing they’re not “Langley” yet!) are the brainchild of American
intelligence agencies released to undermine the standards in the Spectrum movement in
ex-USSR! :)