K1818VG93

ZXNet echo conference «hardware.zx»

From Vasily Strochkin To All 4 December 2005

Hello Mick Mic> Yesterday I wanted to start abusing my ZX-777, which Mic> lay in the storage room for 7 years. So I turned it on to check Mic> whether it works or not, it works, but! :confused: Mic> I insert the floppy disk, but TRDOS writes that it is not there. And so it is with everyone. I think s Mic> disk drive, what happened - I installed it on a PC - the disk drive works there. Mic> So this is typical, the drive does not “grunt” when it starts zero Mic> track search. There was such a glitch before, but it was a long time ago and I don’t remember why Mic> matter. Mic> The cable is also fine. Replacing the VG93 did not produce any results. Who is the thread Mic> will tell you what the problem is. :o On PC drives are installed with ID1 and then turning the cable over makes it zero. I dare to suggest that if he earned money on the PC, this is not true installed ID jumper.

From Mikhail Tarasov To All 5 December 2005

Hello, vasstr vas> On PC drives are installed with ID1 and then turn over the cable vas> makes it null. I dare say that if he made money on vas> there is an incorrectly set ID jumper. No, the reason is banally simple - damn resistors on the drive. I juggled the drive on a PC and forgot about them. And then I remembered - it worked. Well and the question settled itself.

From deathsoft To All 3 February 2007

Hello Conan Con> For example, in i8272, as far as I remember, the track read command works Con> is fine, so what do we get from this? As it turned out, no, when reading a track with the “read track” command on the i8272 synchronization failures occur after the GAP field following the sector data (intersector space), while the address marker of the next sector is read incorrect (all bytes are corrupted), a second synchronization failure also occurs on the boundary of the sector address marker and the sector data field (where the field goes synchronization of 12 zeros). This error is fundamentally different from what happens on the VG93, because on i8272 synchronization failure does not depend on the data in the sector, but always occurs on sector boundary, and synchronization can be restored after several sectors. Why exactly the synchronization fails must be clarified separately, it seems that instead of data pulses, the controller accepts pulses as data synchronization (shift by half a bit interval).

From Alexey Zhabin To All 3 February 2007

Hello, CHRV CHR> By default, the PC drive installed as "A" is visible on the Spectrum as CHR> "B". And if it doesn’t “grunt”, check for 12v. And if there is no 12V, then accept my congratulations - you have already burned 2 VGshki.

From Ivan Shishkin To All 3 February 2007

Hello deathsoft I have had situations like this several times (I don’t know if they have anything to do with this topic): after writing to a floppy disk, the file table shifted by one byte. And the disk, of course, stopped being read by tr-dos. But by downloading any disk editor, and by moving the file table into place, you could return everything to ass

From deathsoft To All 4 February 2007

Hello, Ivan > I had such situations several times (I don’t know if they have > related to this topic): after recording to a floppy disk, a shift occurred > file tables per byte. And the disk, of course, stopped being read > tr-dos. But, by loading any disk editor and moving the table > files in place, everything could be returned to the back. This is not at all. Here we are talking about a shift by half a BIT interval. And not byte.

From Southern Bear To All 6 February 2007

Hello MegaMyth Of course he did. And I even actively used it.

From deathsoft To All 6 February 2007

Hello MegaMyth Meg> Has anyone ever held an 8-inch disk in their hands??? It's lying in my closet at home. Looks like 5.25", only the size of half a sheet A4

From Pavel A. Ivanov To All 6 February 2007

Hello Conan Con> I don’t know how rare or expensive it is Most likely rare, because The datasheet is scanned, and the description says 5/25 and 8 inches... Who finally held an 8-inch disk in his hands???